Cited by 444biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesThermal and Kinetic AnalysisPolymer Science and PVC

Mechanisms and Kinetics of Thermal Degradation of Poly(ε-caprolactone)

Persenaire, Olivier, Alexandre, Michaël, Degée, Philippe, Dubois, Philippe·2001·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) simultaneously coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) and Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) was developed as an original technique to study the thermal modification/degradation of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) through in depth analysis of the evolved gas. Perfectly well-defined PCL samples with controlled end groups, predictable molecular weight, and narrow molecular weight distribution were synthesized by living "coordination-insertion" ring-opening polymerization of epsilon-caprolactone initiated by aluminum triisopropoxide. TGA analyses carried out on purified PCL samples, deprived from any residual catalyst or monomer, highlighted a two-step thermal degradation. Evolved gas analysis by both MS and FTIR showed that the first process implies a statistical rupture of the polyester chains via ester pyrolysis reaction. The produced gases were identified as H(2)O, CO(2), and 5-hexenoic acid. The second step leads to the formation of epsilon-caprolactone (cyclic monomer) as result of an unzipping depolymerization process. The influence of parameters such as polyester molecular weight, nature of the PCL end groups, and presence of catalytic residues as well as the type of purge gas were investigated. The activation energy of the thermal degradation was also studied.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bm0056310

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Persenaire, O., Alexandre, M., Degée, P., & Dubois, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Mons (BE)
  • Laboratory of Polymeric and Composite Materials, University of Mons-Hainaut, Place du Parc, 20-7000 Mons, Belgium
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2001-02-16
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
288-294
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W2051603731
Cited by
444
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomacromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Science and PVC
Keywords
polycaprolactone, thermal degradation, degradation kinetics, ester pyrolysis, depolymerization, end groups, molecular weight effects, activation energy, evolved gas analysis, thermogravimetric analysis
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Gel, Gases, Hot Temperature, Kinetics, Molecular Weight, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Polyesters, Molecular Structure, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review