Cited by 436Stress Responses and CortisolChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 14 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Recent life events, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone and the onset of major depression in high-risk adolescents

Open access
Goodyer, I. M., Herbert, J., Tamplin, A., Altham, P. M. E.·2000·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: It is not clear whether cortisol or dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) hypersecretion increases the risk for major depression in the presence of undesirable life events. Aims: To determine whether there is a specific pattern of psychoendocrine factors that predicts the onset of major depressive disorder. Method: 180 adolescents (73 boys, 107 girls) at high risk for psychopathology were assessed for cortisol, DHEA, depressive symptoms, life events and psychiatric disorder at entry and 12 months later. Results: Major depression was predicted for both genders by the additive effects of: higher depressive symptoms; personal disappointments and losses only in the month before onset; one or more daily levels of cortisol at 08.00 h or DHEA at 20.00 h greater than the 80th percentile of the daily mean. Conclusions: A subgroup of adolescents may carry a physiological risk for major depression which may be either of genetic and/or earlier psychosocial origin.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In high-risk adolescents, onset of DSM-IV major depression over 12 months was predicted by recent proximal disappointments/losses, higher depressive symptoms, and daily peaks of morning cortisol or evening DHEA. These psychosocial and endocrine predictors appeared independent.

Key findings

  • Of 171 reassessed adolescents, 30 (18%) had an onset of DSM-IV major depression. Cases were more likely than non-cases to have undesirable events only in the preceding month: 18/30 (60%) v. 31/141 (22%), exact test P=0.0001, odds ratio 5.4 (95% CI 2.4–12.2); general event burden over 12 months did not differ.
  • In conditional fixed-effects logistic regression, only disappointments (OR 58.9, P=0.0001, 95% CI 7.0–495.5) and permanent losses (OR 8.8, P=0.004, 95% CI 2.02–38.6) in the month before onset predicted MDD, along with lower mood and feelings scores (OR 1.1, P=0.051, 95% CI 1.00–1.13).
  • Peak cortisol at 08.00 h (OR 7.1, P=0.008, 95% CI 1.67–30.4) and peak DHEA at 20.00 h (OR 4.2, P=0.02, 95% CI 1.2–14.7) predicted subsequent MDD; absolute mean hormone levels did not contribute to the model.
  • Peak-positive status was unrelated to life events or MFQ scores, and only 16/30 (53%) MDD episodes were preceded by a disappointment or loss event.

Methods

  • Prospective high-risk sample: 1451 adolescents screened; 180 high-risk adolescents (73 boys, 107 girls) entered, and 171 completed psychosocial and endocrine follow-up; 30 MDD onsets occurred.
  • Measures at entry and 12 months included Kiddie-SADS, life events interview, Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, and salivary cortisol and DHEA at 08.00 h and 20.00 h over 4 consecutive days; a peak was defined a priori as one or more level greater than the 80th percentile of the daily group mean (by gender, and by age for DHEA).
  • Analysis used exact statistics, Bonferroni-corrected ANOVA on log-transformed continuous data, and conditional fixed-effects logistic regression to predict MDD onset.

Limitations

  • Stated: the small number of boys with depression limited gender analyses; only 4 days of saliva collection were undertaken and the validity of the peak measure requires further investigation; it remains unclear whether peaks are psychopathologically significant only in high-risk adolescents; the design was not adequate to test physiological reactivity to minor events or hassles; nearly all subjects were post-pubertal, so puberty-related endocrine risk could not be assessed; findings may not generalise to adolescents not at high risk.
  • Evident from the text: the observational design cannot establish causality, and life events and mood were assessed by self-report.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.177.6.499

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

3 of 14 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 34 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 16
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
26 of 26
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The recognition of proximal life events is accurate.

    “Provided that the recognition of proximal events is accurate, this suggests of proximal events is accurate, this suggests that there may be other factors that there may be other factors predisposing to disorder.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reported cortisol am:pm ratio conflicts with the reported means

    Minor

    The stated 12:8 ratio is 1.5:1. Table 2 reports morning and evening cortisol means of 3.23 and 0.47 ng/ml for males, and 3.9 and 0.45 ng/ml for females-approximately 6.9:1 and 8.7:1, respectively.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 27 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–433 of 433

Metadata

Authors
Goodyer, I. M., Herbert, J., Tamplin, A., & Altham, P. M. E.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Goodyer, I. M.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2000-12
Volume
177
Issue
6
Pages
499-504
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2012890086
Cited by
436
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 22
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, adolescents, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, life events, depressive symptoms, high-risk adolescents, psychosocial risk factors, diurnal cortisol rhythm, depression onset
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Dehydroepiandrosterone, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Life Change Events, Male, Puberty, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Saliva, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-20, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-20 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review