The cortisol awakening response predicts major depression: predictive stability over a 4-year follow-up and effect of depression history
Open accessAbstract
Background: The cortisol awakening response (CAR) has been shown to predict major depressive episodes (MDEs) over a 1-year period. It is unknown whether this effect: (a) is stable over longer periods of time; (b) is independent of prospective stressful life events; and (c) differentially predicts first onsets or recurrences of MDEs. Method: A total of 270 older adolescents (mean age 17.06 years at cortisol measurement) from the larger prospective Northwestern-UCLA Youth Emotion Project completed baseline diagnostic and life stress interviews, questionnaires, and a 3-day cortisol sampling protocol measuring the CAR and diurnal rhythm, as well as up to four annual follow-up interviews of diagnoses and life stress. Results: Non-proportional person-month survival analyses revealed that higher levels of the baseline CAR significantly predict MDEs for 2.5 years following cortisol measurement. However, the strength of prediction of depressive episodes significantly decays over time, with the CAR no longer significantly predicting MDEs after 2.5 years. Elevations in the CAR did not significantly increase vulnerability to prospective major stressful life events. They did, however, predict MDE recurrences more strongly than first onsets. Conclusions: These results suggest that a high CAR represents a time-limited risk factor for onsets of MDEs, which increases risk for depression independently of future major stressful life events. Possible explanations for the stronger effect of the CAR for predicting MDE recurrences than first onsets are discussed.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a 4-year follow-up of 270 older adolescents, a higher baseline cortisol awakening response (CAR) predicted major depressive episodes (MDEs) for about 2.5 years, with predictive strength decaying over time. The CAR predicted MDEs independently of prospective major stressful life events and more strongly predicted recurrences than first onsets.
Key findings
- The CAR significantly predicted MDEs up to 30 months (2.5 years) after cortisol measurement, but not at 36 months and beyond; at the median time of 21 months, a 1-SD increase in CAR was associated with approximately double the risk for MDE onset, and at 6 months it corresponded to a roughly 3.5-fold increase in risk.
- Predictive power decayed by about 3% per month, and the CAR × time interaction remained significant after adjusting for neuroticism, baseline anxiety disorder and MDE history, baseline episodic and chronic life stress, and negative affect and fatigue at cortisol sampling.
- The CAR × major stressful life events interaction was not significant, while major stressful life events in the past month robustly predicted MDE onsets; the CAR and its interaction with time remained significant predictors independently of major stressful life events.
- The MDE history × CAR interaction was significant: elevated CARs predicted first onsets, but predicted recurrences with greater strength; CAR magnitudes did not significantly differ by MDE history [F(1, 40) = 0.22, n.s.], and time to onset did not differ significantly between first onsets (mean = 22.19, s.d. = 12.64) and recurrences (mean = 21.13, s.d. = 16.59) [F(1, 40) = 0.053, p = 0.82].
Methods
- Participants were 270 older adolescents (mean age 17.06 years at cortisol measurement; 75 males, 195 females) from the Northwestern-UCLA Youth Emotion Project, after exclusions from 344 who completed the cortisol protocol; the sample was oversampled for high neuroticism (59%).
- At baseline, participants completed diagnostic and life stress interviews, questionnaires, and a 3-day cortisol sampling protocol measuring the CAR and diurnal rhythm; up to four annual follow-up interviews assessed diagnoses and life stress.
- Main analyses used Cox regression models in a person-month dataset, including non-proportional hazards models with CAR × time interactions; a maximum of one MDE onset per participant was included, and continuous predictors were standardized.
Limitations
- The paper states that only two samples (0 and 40 min after waking) were collected to define the CAR, rather than the original approach using samples every 10–15 min for 1 h after waking.
- The paper states that major stressful life events were examined in an aggregate fashion, so the CAR may increase vulnerability to certain types of major events but not all.
- The paper states that a developmental interpretation cannot be ruled out, that male MDE onsets were too few (seven cases) to test a gender × CAR interaction, and that findings may need replication in a representative community sample or a sample selected on a different risk factor such as family history of depression.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
11 of 27 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The cortisol awakening response (CAR) prospectively predicted major depressive episodes (MDEs) over a 1-year follow-up period (odds ratio 3.0, p = 0.04).
“The cortisol awakening response (CAR) has been shown to predict major depressive episodes (MDEs) over a 1-year period.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Recently, we showed that the CAR prospectively predicted the occurrence of MDEs across a 1-year follow-up period (odds ratio 3.0, p = 0.04; Adam et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Adam et al. 2010 source
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Premisecitation
Other basal cortisol indices, namely the diurnal slope and total waking cortisol (AUCg), were not related to MDE onsets during the 1-year follow-up period.
“Other basal cortisol indices, namely the diurnal slope and total waking cortisol (area under the curve with respect to ground; AUCg), were not related to MDE onsets during this follow-up period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Adam et al. 2010 source
- Premisecitation
Several prospective studies have shown that morning cortisol levels, around the peak of the diurnal rhythm, prospectively predict depressive episodes or symptoms.
“Several prospective studies of HPA functioning and depression have shown that cortisol levels during the morning (rather than average or total cortisol levels throughout the day), around the peak of cortisol’s diurnal rhythm, prospectively predict depressive episodes or symptoms (Harris et al. 2000; Halligan et al. 2007; Goodyer et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Harris et al. 2000 source
The Results (‘Hormone levels at entry and subsequent MDD’) report that morning cortisol, but not evening cortisol, was significantly associated with subsequent major depression in the adult women studied. The Discussion likewise says the association was limited to morning cortisol, when levels are highest. The paper does not establish the claim’s comparison with average or total cortisol levels throughout the day. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Halligan et al. 2007 source
- cites Goodyer et al. 2010 source
The Results section (‘Predicting subsequent depressive episode onset’) reports that adolescents with higher morning salivary cortisol at entry were more likely to experience a depressive episode during follow-up. The Cortisol assay section describes morning sampling only; this paper does not compare morning cortisol with average or total cortisol levels across the day, so it does not support that contrast. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The CAR's ability to predict depression onset was independent of an index of moderate to severe episodic stressful events occurring in approximately the year prior to cortisol measurement.
“Our research has shown that the CAR’s ability to predict depression onset was independent of an index of moderate to severe episodic stressful events occurring in approximately the year prior to cortisol measurement (Adam et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Adam et al. 2010 source
The Results (Associations between life stress, the CAR and MDD) and Discussion say that CAR and life-stress measures independently predicted later MDD. But the Methods (Baseline Questionnaires and Interviews) describe a prior-year index combining chronic and episodic stress, with episodic events included from a threshold of at least mild to moderately stressful—not an index limited to moderate-to-severe episodic events. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
There was no evidence for a decline in the underlying risk of depressive onsets per person-month (hazard function) over time.
“There was no evidence for a decline in the underlying risk of depressive onsets per person-month (hazard function) over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
The CAR × major stressful life events interaction was not significant.
“While a main effect of major stressful life events occurring in the past month robustly predicted MDE onsets, the CAR × major stressful life events interaction was not significant (Table 3, model 3).”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“Further, the CAR does not significantly enhance vulnerability to major stressful life events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
- Findingown data
Major stressful life events occurring in the past month robustly predicted MDE onsets.
“While a main effect of major stressful life events occurring in the past month robustly predicted MDE onsets, the CAR × major stressful life events interaction was not significant (Table 3, model 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The strength of prediction of depressive episodes significantly decays over time, with the CAR no longer significantly predicting MDEs after 2.5 years.
“However, the strength of prediction of depressive episodes significantly decays over time, with the CAR no longer significantly predicting MDEs after 2.5 years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Elevations in the CAR did not significantly increase vulnerability to prospective major stressful life events.
“Elevations in the CAR did not significantly increase vulnerability to prospective major stressful life events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CAR magnitudes did not significantly differ as a function of MDE history.
“This interaction effect was not a matter of differing CAR magnitudes in the first-onset and recurrence groups, as CAR magnitudes did not significantly differ as a function of MDE history [F(1, 40) = 0.22, n.s.].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The CAR predicts MDE recurrences more strongly than first onsets.
“They did, however, predict MDE recurrences more strongly than first onsets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Higher levels of the baseline CAR significantly predict MDEs for 2.5 years following cortisol measurement.
“Non-proportional person-month survival analyses revealed that higher levels of the baseline CAR significantly predict MDEs for 2.5 years following cortisol measurement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The MDE history × CAR interaction effect was significant.
“The MDE history × CAR interaction effect was also significant (Table 3, model 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Including time interactions for the additional covariates did not alter the findings.
“Including time interactions for the additional covariates did not alter the findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The number of months between cortisol measurement and MDE onset did not differ significantly between first onsets and recurrences.
“Further, the number of months between cortisol measurement and MDE onset did not differ significantly between first onsets (mean = 22.19, s.d. = 12.64) and recurrences (mean = 21.13, s.d. = 16.59) [F(1, 40) = 0.053, p = 0.82].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The CAR and its interaction with time remained significant predictors of MDEs independently of major stressful life events.
“The CAR and its interaction with time remained significant predictors of MDEs independently of major stressful life events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
An elevated CAR should not be construed solely as a 'scar' of depression, i.e. a marker that is only present following an MDE.
“Because the CAR prospectively predicts first onsets, these data suggest that an elevated CAR should not be construed solely as a ‘scar’ of depression (Cowen, 2010), i.e. a marker that is only present following an MDE, which may be indicative of damage caused by the episode.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cowen, 2010 source
- Interpretationown data
The CAR appears to serve as a time-limited risk factor for depression.
“Thus, the CAR appears to serve as a time-limited risk factor for depression.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · hedged
“That is, the CAR appears to function as a time-limited risk factor for depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusions · hedged
- Premisecitation
The CAR may reach physiological levels capable of activating relatively low-affinity glucocorticoid receptors implicated in the etiology of major depressive disorder.
“potentially reaching physiological levels capable of activating relatively low-affinity glucocorticoid receptors implicated in the etiology of major depressive disorder (e.g. Holsboer, 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holsboer, 2000 source
- Interpretationown data
The CAR, and not other aspects of the diurnal cortisol rhythm, predicts future MDE onsets.
“Taken together, these findings suggest that the CAR and not other aspects of the diurnal cortisol rhythm predict future MDE onsets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The present study oversampled for participants with high levels of neuroticism (59%).
“Finally, given that the present study oversampled for participants with high levels of neuroticism (59%), it may be important to replicate these findings among a representative community sample or a sample selected based on a different risk factor, such as family history of depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
- May combine two claims. 18
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe CAR captures a large and rapid increase on top of already elevated waking cortisol levels.
“The CAR is thought to be an important indicator of risk for major depressive episodes (MDE) in part because it captures a large and rapid increase on top of already elevated waking cortisol levels (Adam et al. 2010)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Adam et al. 2010 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe CAR serves to mobilize resources to meet the perceived demands of the upcoming day.
“current theory suggests that it serves to mobilize resources to meet the perceived demands of the upcoming day (e.g. Adam et al. 2006; Fries et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCurrent theory posits that the CAR functions to prepare the individual to rise to the expected demands of the upcoming day.
“Current theory posits that the CAR functions to prepare the individual to rise to the expected demands of the upcoming day (Adam et al. 2006; Fries et al. 2009); thus, the presence of the CAR can be seen as adaptive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFlattened diurnal cortisol slopes may serve as a marker of the day's levels of negative emotions such as tension and anger, leading to elevated evening cortisol levels.
“By contrast, flattened diurnal cortisol slopes may serve as a marker of the day’s levels of negative emotions such as tension and anger, leading to elevated evening cortisol levels (Adam et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Adam et al. 2006 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationOur prior report after a 1-year follow-up presented descriptive data supporting that both first onsets and recurrences of MDE were predicted by elevations in the CAR.
“While our prior report after a 1-year follow-up presented descriptive data supporting that both first onsets and recurrences of MDE were predicted by elevations in the CAR (Adam et al. 2010)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Adam et al. 2010 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior research has demonstrated unique effects of elevated morning cortisol and of stressful life events in the month prior to depressive onset.
“prior research has demonstrated unique effects of elevated morning cortisol and of stressful life events in the month prior to depressive onset (Goodyer et al. 2000)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Goodyer et al. 2000 source
In “Peak hormones, life events and depressive symptoms at entry” (page unavailable), the paper reports separate associations of 08.00 h cortisol peaks and disappointments or losses in the month closest to onset with subsequent depression. The claim is broader than the finding: the predictive cortisol measure was a peak, not elevated absolute cortisol levels, and the significant life events were specifically disappointments and losses. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CAR × time interaction was significant; the predictive power of the CAR degraded about 3% per month with successive months.
“The CAR × time interaction was also significant; the predictive power of the CAR degraded (about 3% per month) with successive months (Table 3, model 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe simple main effect of CAR, indicating its relationship to first onsets of MDE, remained significant, as did the CAR × time interaction.
“When this MDE history × CAR interaction was added, the simple main effect of CAR, indicating its relationship to first onsets of MDE, remained significant, as did the CAR × time interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen a maximum of one prospective MDE onset per person is considered, the CAR significantly predicts both first onsets and recurrences of depression, but predicts recurrences with greater strength than first onsets.
“In addition, the results showed that when a single prospective MDE onset per person is considered, the CAR significantly predicts both first onsets and recurrences of depression, but that the CAR predicts recurrences with greater strength than it predicts first onsets.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“Third, while the CAR predicts both first onsets and recurrences of depression when a maximum of one prospective MDE onset per person is considered, it predicts recurrences with greater strength than first onsets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter adding other known predictors and potential confounders (neuroticism, anxiety/history of MDE, life stress, negative affect/fatigue), the CAR and its interaction with time remained significant predictors of MDEs with very similar hazard ratios as in the primary model.
“Although in each case the additional block made a significant contribution to predicting onsets of MDE [all block changes in χ2 (df≤2) ≥13.60, all p’s <0.05], the CAR and its interaction with time remained significant predictors of MDEs with very similar HRs as in the primary model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA total of 10,723 person-months were available for analysis of MDE onsets for the primary model.
“A total of 10 723 person-months were available for analysis of MDE onsets for the primary model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataElevated CARs significantly predicted first onsets, but predicted recurrences with greater strength.
“Whereas elevated CARs significantly predicted first onsets, they predicted recurrences with greater strength.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In addition, the results showed that when a single prospective MDE onset per person is considered, the CAR significantly predicts both first onsets and recurrences of depression, but that the CAR predicts recurrences with greater strength than it predicts first onsets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen person-months without LSI data were excluded, 9645 person-months were available, including 39 MDE onsets.
“When person-months without LSI data were excluded, a total of 9645 person-months were available, including 39 MDE onsets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CAR significantly predicts MDEs in the sample up to 30 months (2.5 years), but not significantly at 36 months and beyond.
“Results also indicate that the CAR significantly predicts MDEs in our sample up to 30 months, or 2.5 years, but not significantly so at 36 months and beyond.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · boosted
“This is the first study to demonstrate that the CAR predicts depression onsets for 2.5 years of a 4-year follow-up, initially serving as a strong predictor but ‘decaying’ in its predictive ability with the passage of time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Conclusions · boosted
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMaximal effects were seen shortly after cortisol measurement, with a one standard deviation increase in the CAR corresponding to a roughly 3.5-fold increase in risk for MDE onset.
“As implied by the linear decline in prediction over time, maximal effects were seen shortly after cortisol measurement, with a one standard deviation increase in the CAR corresponding to a roughly 3.5-fold increase in risk for MDE onset (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA total of 42 major depressive episodes (MDEs) were observed after participation in the cortisol protocol: 35 in females, 7 in males; 27 first onsets and 15 recurrences; time to onset ranged from less than 1 month to 53 months.
“A total of 42 MDEs were observed (35 in females, seven in males; 27 first onsets, 15 recurrences) after participation in the cortisol protocol, with time to onset ranging from less than 1 month to 53 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth the CAR and major stressful life events predict MDEs uniquely and independently of one another.
“The results indicate that both the CAR and major events predict MDEs uniquely and independently of one another.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the final primary model, the CAR was a significant prospective predictor of MDEs; at the median of time (21 months), any one standard deviation increase in the CAR is associated with approximately double the risk for MDE onset.
“In the final primary model, the CAR was a significant prospective predictor of MDEs; at the median of time (21 months), any one standard deviation increase in the CAR is associated with approximately double the risk for MDE onset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe CAR is a pronounced increase in cortisol level (on average 50-60%) that peaks approximately 30 to 40 min after waking.
“the cortisol awakening response (CAR) – the pronounced (on average, 50–60%) increase in cortisol level that peaks approximately 30 to 40 min after waking (Pruessner et al. 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pruessner et al. 1997 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe CAR represents a true response to waking, rather than an underlying diurnal rhythm.
“Experimental research indicates that the CAR represents a true response to waking, rather than an underlying diurnal rhythm (Wilhelm et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilhelm et al. 2007 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and particularly the hormone cortisol, has been implicated in the etiology of major depressive disorder by animal and cross-sectional human research.
“Dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, and particularly the hormone cortisol, has been implicated in the etiology of major depressive disorder by a large body of animal research and cross-sectional research in humans (Chrousos & Gold, 1992; Ehlert et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chrousos & Gold, 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ehlert et al. 2001 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe CAR is frequently operationalized as the difference between salivary cortisol sampled immediately after waking and the level sampled 30 to 40 min after waking.
“The CAR is frequently operationalized as the difference between the level of salivary cortisol sampled immediately after waking and the level sampled 30 to 40 min after waking (Clow et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Clow et al. 2010 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMajor stressful life events precipitate MDEs, often within the month after the event.
“Major stressful life events are known to precipitate MDEs, often within the month after the occurrence of an event (Kendler et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kendler et al. 1999 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll diagnoses reported were clinically significant manifestations.
“All diagnoses reported here were clinically significant manifestations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInter-rater reliability for MDE diagnoses across five assessment periods was high (k ranged 0.82 to 0.94, mean 0.89, s.d. 0.05).
“Across the five assessment periods, k for individual interviewers’ diagnoses of MDEs, adjusted due to departure from equiprobability (R. Zinbarg et al. unpublished observations), ranged from 0.82 to 0.94 (mean = 0.89, s.d. = 0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataParticipants included in analyses did not differ significantly from those excluded in gender, minority race/ethnicity, or baseline Hollingshead socio-economic status.
“Participants who were included in analyses did not differ significantly from those who were excluded in: gender [χ2(1) = 0.79, n.s.]; minority race/ethnicity [χ2(1) = 3.29, n.s.]; or baseline Hollingshead socio-economic status level [F(1, 334) = 0.66, n.s.].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInter-rater reliability for episodic life stress severity ratings cross-site ranged from 0.69 to 0.76 (mean 0.72, s.d. 0.03).
“Inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlations) cross-site for the five interviews examined ranged from 0.69 to 0.76 (mean = 0.72, s.d. = 0.03).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataInter-rater reliability for the baseline chronic stress composite score was 0.87 within site and 0.84 across sites.
“Inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlations) for the baseline chronic stress composite score was 0.87 within site and 0.84 across sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningFrequent large CAR values may indicate excessive perceived demands and/or insufficient perceived resources to meet those demands.
“However, frequent large CAR values may indicate excessive perceived demands and/or insufficient perceived resources (e.g. competencies and social support) to meet those demands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataCortisol assay intra-assay variation ranged from 4.0% to 6.7%, and inter-assay variation ranged from 7.1% to 9.0%.
“Intra-assay variation ranged from 4.0% to 6.7%, while inter-assay variation ranged from 7.1% to 9.0%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe study used non-proportional hazards models that do not assume the hazard associated with a predictor is constant across time, permitting examination of interactions with time.
“In order to examine the predictive stability of the CAR, non-proportional hazards models were employed. Unlike proportional hazards models, such models do not assume that the hazard associated with a particular predictor is constant across time, permitting the examination of interactions with time (Singer & Willett, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singer & Willett, 2003 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataTemporal precedence of stressful life events and MDE onsets was carefully scrutinized; events with indeterminate order or occurring after MDE onset were excluded.
“Whether life events indicated as occurring in the same month as MDE onsets in fact occurred before the MDE onsets (i.e. temporal precedence) was carefully scrutinized. When the order of the event and the MDE onset was indeterminate, or when the event clearly occurred after the MDE onset, that event was excluded from consideration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenA maximum of one MDE onset per participant was included; once a participant experienced an MDE onset after cortisol measurement, their remaining months were not included.
“A maximum of one MDE onset per participant was included in the model, whether that MDE represented a first onset or a recurrence of MDE; that is, once a participant experienced an MDE onset after cortisol measurement, their remaining months were not included.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationEarlier age of first onset is associated with a worse course of illness.
“Earlier age of first onset is associated with a worse course of illness (Boland & Keller, 2009) and may account for the observed effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boland & Keller, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataA high CAR represents a time-limited risk factor for onsets of MDEs, which increases risk for depression independently of future major stressful life events.
“These results suggest that a high CAR represents a time-limited risk factor for onsets of MDEs, which increases risk for depression independently of future major stressful life events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenInterviewers were blind to the results of previous assessments.
“Interviewers were blind to the results of previous assessments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFlattened diurnal slopes are suggested to serve as a 'scar' marker for prior depression.
“Flattened diurnal slopes are also suggested to serve as a ‘scar’ marker for prior depression (Doane et al. in press), suggesting they may indicate allostatic load associated with accommodating recent psychopathology, among other stressors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Doane et al. in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenMajor stressful life events were examined in an aggregate fashion.
“Second, although the examination of stressful life events in person-month format represents an advancement over other approaches, we have examined major stressful life events in an aggregate fashion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningOnly two samples were collected to define the CAR (0 and 40 min after waking), rather than the original approach of samples taken every 10-15 min for 1 h after waking.
“First, due to concerns about feasibility with 17-year-olds and participant burden, only two samples were collected to define the CAR (0 and 40 min after waking), rather than the original approach, which relied on samples taken every 10–15 min for 1 h after waking (Pruessner et al. 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pruessner et al. 1997 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study cannot rule out a developmental interpretation whereby the CAR's interaction with time indicates that the CAR was particularly important during the age range closest to the CAR measurement (roughly ages 17 to 19 years), rather than a decay in predictive ability.
“Third, we cannot rule out a developmental interpretation whereby the CAR’s interaction with time indicates that the CAR was particularly important during the age range closest to the CAR measurement (i.e. roughly ages 17 to 19 years), rather than a decay in predictive ability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe number of onsets among males remains too low to address whether the CAR's relation to prospective MDE onsets differed between males and females (seven cases).
“Fourth, we would have liked to examine whether the CAR’s relation to prospective MDE onsets differed between males and females, i.e. a gender × CAR interaction; however, the number of onsets among males remains too low to address this question (seven cases).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe CAR appears to be regulated by a range of factors, including extra-pituitary efferent pathways from the suprachiasmatic nucleus to the adrenal influencing sensitivity to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and a role for hippocampal functioning, perhaps particularly pre-awakening.
“Further, the CAR appears to be regulated by a range of factors, including extra-pituitary efferent pathways from the suprachiasmatic nucleus to the adrenal influencing sensitivity to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and a role for hippocampal functioning, perhaps particularly pre-awakening (Clow et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Clow et al. 2010 source
The paper relies on this without support.
This is the first study to explicitly test the extent to which the CAR predicts MDE onsets consistently over an extended period of time.
“Using data from 270 participants from the larger Youth Emotion Project over four annual follow-ups, this is the first study to explicitly test the extent to which the CAR predicts MDE onsets consistently over an extended period of time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
This is the first study to examine whether the CAR predicts MDE onsets in interaction with prospectively occurring major stressful life events.
“This is also the first study to examine whether the CAR predicts MDE onsets in interaction with prospectively occurring major stressful life events.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The direction of the present findings (blunted CAR and less daily cortisol output interacting with stressful events to predict depressive symptoms) is opposite of previous findings in this area.
“The present study found that blunted CAR and less daily cortisol output interacted with stressful events to prospectively predict depressive symptoms. This direction is opposite of those from previous findings in this area.8,15”
From DIURNAL CORTISOL INTERACTS WITH STRESSFUL EVENTS TO PROSPECTIVELY PREDICT DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS IN ADOLESCENT GIRLS (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The Discussion reports that a high CAR predicts future major depressive episode onsets, the opposite direction from the citing study’s blunted-CAR finding. But the Results say the CAR × stressful-life-events interaction was not significant, and the Discussion says other aspects of the diurnal cortisol rhythm did not predict onsets. This source therefore does not establish an opposite finding for the claimed stress interaction or lower daily cortisol output. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentχ²(1) = 0.79reported n.s. · recomputed p = .374
“χ2(1) = 0.79, n.s.”
- Consistentχ²(1) = 3.29reported n.s. · recomputed p = .070
“χ2(1) = 3.29, n.s.”
- ConsistentF(1, 334) = 0.66reported n.s. · recomputed p = .417
“F(1, 334) = 0.66, n.s.”
- ConsistentF(1, 40) = 0.22reported n.s. · recomputed p = .642
“F(1, 40) = 0.22, n.s.”
- ConsistentF(1, 40) = 0.053reported p = .82 · recomputed p = .819
“F(1, 40) = 0.053, p = .82”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793 · see citing works
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297 · see citing works
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001 · Cited by 10,647 · see citing works
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319 · Cited by 7,306 · see citing works
Four Factor Index of Social Status
Paschou, R. (1975) · Cited by 6,989 · see citing works
Four Factor Index of Social Status [1975]
Hollingshead, A. B. (1975) · Cited by 5,151 · see citing works
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,151 · see citing works
A revised version of the Psychoticism scale
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1 · Cited by 3,094 · see citing works
Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings.
Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322 · Cited by 2,986 · see citing works
The Concepts of Stress and Stress System Disorders: Overview of Physical and Behavioral Homeostasis
Chrousos, G. P. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480090092034 · Cited by 2,689 · see citing works
Causal Relationship Between Stressful Life Events and the Onset of Major Depression
Kendler, K. S., Karkowski, L. M., & Prescott, C. A. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.6.837 · Cited by 2,486 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Second, do elevations in the CAR increase vulnerability to prospective major stressful life events? Major stressful life events are known to precipitate MDEs, often within the month after the occurrence of an event (Kendler et al. 1999).”
BackgroundPersonality Psychology in Europe
Vera-Bermudez, J., Raad, D. B., de Vries, J., García, A. M. P., Sanchez-Elvita, A., & Heck, G. V. (1997) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 2,462 · see citing works
The Corticosteroid Receptor Hypothesis of Depression
Holsboer, F. (2000) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(00)00159-7 · Cited by 2,181 · see citing works
Transduction of psychosocial stress into the neurobiology of recurrent affective disorder
(1992) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.149.8.999 · Cited by 1,848 · see citing works
Mini-Markers: A Brief Version of Goldberg's Unipolar Big-Five Markers
Saucier, G. (1994) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8 · Cited by 1,717 · see citing works
Pruessner, J. C., Wolf, O. T., Hellhammer, D. H., Buske-Kirschbaum, A., von Auer, K., Jobst, S., Kaspers, F., & Kirschbaum, C. (1997) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0024-3205(97)01008-4 · Cited by 1,450 · see citing works
Generation of stress in the course of unipolar depression.
Hammen, C. (1991) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.100.4.555 · Cited by 1,446 · see citing works
The cortisol awakening response (CAR): Facts and future directions
Fries, E., Dettenborn, L., & Kirschbaum, C. (2009) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.014 · Cited by 1,188 · see citing works
Generation of stress in the course of unipolar depression.
Hammen, C. L. (1991) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.100.4.555 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Dressendörfer, R. A., Kirschbaum, C., Rohde, W., Stahl, F., & Strasburger, C. J. (1992) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0960-0760(92)90294-s · Cited by 882 · see citing works
Kendler, K. S., Kuhn, J., & Prescott, C. A. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.631 · Cited by 799 · see citing works
Day-to-day dynamics of experience–cortisol associations in a population-based sample of older adults
Adam, E. K., Hawkley, L. C., Kudielka, B. M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605053103 · Cited by 782 · see citing works
Self-citationCortisol and post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Meewisse, M.-L., Reitsma, J. B., De Vries, G.-J., Gersons, B. P. R., & Olff, M. (2007) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024877 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
The cortisol awakening response: More than a measure of HPA axis function
Clow, A., Hucklebridge, F., Stalder, T., Evans, P., & Thorn, L. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.011 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Ehlert, U., Gaab, J., & Heinrichs, M. (2001) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(01)00092-8 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Is the cortisol awakening rise a response to awakening?
Wilhelm, I., Born, J., Kudielka, B. M., Schlotz, W., & Wüst, S. (2007) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.01.008 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Goodyer, I. M., Herbert, J., Tamplin, A., & Altham, P. M. E. (2000) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.177.6.499 · Cited by 436 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To our knowledge, prior research has demonstrated unique effects of elevated morning cortisol and of stressful life events in the month prior to depressive onset (Goodyer et al. 2000), but research has not tested whether morning cortisol peaks (or an elevated CAR) significantly interact with stressful life events in p…”
BackgroundChildren of depressed mothers: Maternal strain and symptom predictors of dysfunction.
Hammen, C. L., Adrian, C., Gordon, D., Burge, D., Jaenicke, C., & Hiroto, D. (1987) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.96.3.190 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Children of depressed mothers: maternal strain and symptom predictors of dysfunction
Hammen, C., Adrian, C., Gordon, D., Burge, D., Jaenicke, C., & Hiroto, D. (1987) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.96.3.190 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Prospective prediction of major depressive disorder from cortisol awakening responses in adolescence
Adam, E. K., Doane, L. D., Zinbarg, R. E., Mineka, S., Craske, M. G., & Griffith, J. W. (2010) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.007 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Self-citationAdam, E. K. (2001) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(00)00045-7 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citationShirtcliff, E. A., & Essex, M. J. (2008) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.20336 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Morning cortisol as a risk factor for subsequent major depressive disorder in adult women
Harris, T. O., Borsanyi, S., Messari, S., Stanford, K., Cleary, S. E., Shiers, H. M., Brown, G. W., & Herbert, J. (2000) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.177.6.505 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Halligan, S. L., Herbert, J., Goodyer, I., & Murray, L. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.011 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Not fade away: the HPA axis and depression
Cowen, P. J. (2010) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291709005558 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Doane, L. D., Mineka, S., Zinbarg, R. E., Craske, M. G., Griffith, J. W., & Adam, E. K. (2013) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579413000060 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationCourse and outcome of depression.
BOLAND, R. J., & Keller, M. B. (2002) · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Zinbarg, R. E., Mineka, S., Craske, M. G., Griffith, J. W., Sutton, J. M., Rose, R. D., Nazarian, M., Mor, N., & Waters, A. M. (2009) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.008 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationGoodyer, I. M., Croudace, T., Dudbridge, F., Ban, M., & Herbert, J. (2010) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.077750 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Early and late life events and salivary cortisol in older persons
Gerritsen, L., Geerlings, M. I., Beekman, A. T. F., Deeg, D. J. H., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Comijs, H. C. (2009) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291709991863 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Boland, 2009, Handbook of Depression, 23
- First, 2001, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders-Non-Patient Edition
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prospective biomarkers of major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Kennis, M., Gerritsen, L., van Dalen, M., Williams, A., Cuijpers, P., & Bockting, C. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0585-z · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Dalile, B., Vervliet, B., Bergonzelli, G., Verbeke, K., & Van Oudenhove, L. (2020) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-020-0732-x · Cited by 201 · see citing works
The cortisol awakening response and major depression: examining the evidence
Dedovic, K., & Ngiam, J. (2015) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s62289 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Maltreatment and diurnal cortisol regulation: a meta-analysis
Bernard, K., Frost, A., Bennett, C. B., & Lindhiem, O. (2017) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.01.005 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Christopher, M. S., Goerling, R. J., Rogers, B. S., Hunsinger, M., Baron, G., Bergman, A. L., & Zava, D. T. (2016) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-015-9161-x · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Herbert, J., & Lucassen, P. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2015.12.001 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Zinbarg, R. E., Mineka, S., Bobova, L., Craske, M. G., Vrshek-Schallhorn, S., Griffith, J. W., Wolitzky-Taylor, K., Waters, A. M., Sumner, J. A., & Anand, D. (2016) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702615618162 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Ramler, T. R., Tennison, L. R., Lynch, J., & Murphy, P. (2016) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0398-3 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Latent trait cortisol (LTC) levels: Reliability, validity, and stability
Doane, L. D., Chen, F. R., Sladek, M. R., Van Lenten, S. A., & Granger, D. A. (2015) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.01.017 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationLeMoult, J., Ordaz, S. J., Kircanski, K., Singh, M. K., & Gotlib, I. H. (2015) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000087 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Zou, Y.-F., Wang, F., Feng, X.-L., Li, W.-F., Tao, J.-H., Pan, F.-M., Huang, F., & Su, H. (2010) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.08.019 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Hardeveld, F., Spijker, J., Vreeburg, S. A., Graaf, R. D., Hendriks, S. M., Licht, C. M. M., Nolen, W. A., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Beekman, A. T. F. (2014) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.07.027 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Murphy, M. L. M., Slavich, G. M., Chen, E., & Miller, G. E. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614556320 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Nederhof, E., van Oort, F. V. A., Bouma, E. M. C., Laceulle, O. M., Oldehinkel, A. J., & Ormel, J. (2015) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291715000392 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Abnormal stress responsiveness and suicidal behavior: a risk phenotype
Steinberg, L. J., & Mann, J. J. (2020) · Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.bionps.2020.100011 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Schuler, K. L., Ruggero, C. J., Goldstein, B. L., Perlman, G., Klein, D. N., & Kotov, R. (2017) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.06.005 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vrshek-Schallhorn, S., Doane, L. D., Mineka, S., Zinbarg, R. E., Craske, M. G., & Adam, E. K.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-06-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 483-493
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- PMC
- PMC3500423
- OpenAlex
- W2162304010
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Northwestern University
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH065651, R01‐MH065652, F32 MH091955)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- cortisol awakening response, major depressive episode, depression recurrence, depression onset, older adolescents, diurnal cortisol rhythm, life events, depression biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Circadian Rhythm, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Interview, Psychological, Life Change Events, Male, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Saliva, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Survival Analysis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review