Cited by 43Digital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMental Health Treatment and Access

Web-based intervention for depressive symptoms in adults with types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: a health economic evaluation

Open access
Nobis, Stephanie, Ebert, David Daniel, Lehr, Dirk, Smit, Filip, Buntrock, Claudia, Berking, Matthias, Baumeister, Harald, Snoek, Frank +2 more·2018·The British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Web-based interventions are effective in reducing depression. However, the evidence for the cost-effectiveness of these interventions is scarce. Aims: The aim is to assess the cost-effectiveness of a web-based intervention (GET.ON M.E.D.) for individuals with diabetes and comorbid depression compared with an active control group receiving web-based psychoeducation. Method: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis with treatment response as the outcome and a cost-utility analysis with quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) alongside a randomised controlled trial with 260 participants. Results: At a willingness-to-pay ceiling of €5000 for a treatment response, the intervention has a 97% probability of being regarded as cost-effective compared with the active control group. If society is willing to pay €14 000 for an additional QALY, the intervention has a 51% probability of being cost-effective. Conclusions: This web-based intervention for individuals with diabetes and comorbid depression demonstrated a high probability of being cost-effective compared with an active control group. Declaration of interest: S.N., D.D.E., D.L., M.B. and B.F. are stakeholders of the Institute for Online Health Trainings, which aims to transfer scientific knowledge related to this research into routine healthcare.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.2018.10

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scalability is one of the main arguments for implementation of telehealth compared to face-to-face services, but different delivery modes are also associated with varying costs and time investment from health care professionals posing a potential bottleneck in care distribution.

    “Scalability is one of the main arguments for implementation of telehealth compared to face-to-face services, but different delivery modes are also associated with varying costs and time investment from health care professionals (e.g., one-on-one coaching vs. unguided internet-based intervention) posing a potential bottleneck in care distribution (Berryhill et al., 2019; Nobis et al., 2018).”

    From How to promote usage of telehealth interventions for farmers' mental health? A qualitative study on supporting and hindering aspects for acceptance and satisfaction with a personalized telephone coaching for depression prevention (2023) · cites this paper as Nobis et al., 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Digital depression interventions can work for people with diabetes.

    “As one example, Bendig et al. (2021) reported on a failed trial examining an intervention for depression in people with coronary artery disease, while we do know that this kind of intervention can work e.g. for people with diabetes (Nobis et al., 2018; Nobis et al., 2015; van Bastelaar et al., 2008).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lehnert T, Konnopka A, Riedel-Heller S, König HH. Diabetes mellitus and comorbid depression: economic findings from a systematic literature review. Psychiatr Prax 2011; 38: 369-75.
  2. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997; 35: 1095-108.
  3. Barrett B, Byford S. Acceptable mental health care? A new decision-making tool for cost-effectiveness analysis. Ment Health Res Rev 2001; 9: 39-41.
  4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Dsm-IV (4th ed). American Psychiatric Press, 1994.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nobis, S., Ebert, D. D., Lehr, D., Smit, F., Buntrock, C., Berking, M., Baumeister, H., Snoek, F., Funk, B., & Riper, H.
Affiliations
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • Trimbos Institute (NL)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Nobis, Stephanie
Venue
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2018-03-04
Volume
212
Issue
4
Pages
199-206
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2789876302
Cited by
43
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (2007DE161PR001, ZW6‐80119999, CCI 2007DE161PR001, EFRE: ZW6-80119999, CCI 2007DE161PR001)
  • European Regional Development Fund (ZW6-80119999, CCI 2007DE161PR001, 2007DE161PR001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
online intervention, depression, diabetes mellitus, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, comorbid depression, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility analysis, quality-adjusted life years, psychoeducation, digital mental health interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review