Cited by 165Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Computer-aided psychotherapy: Revolution or bubble?

Open access
Marks, I. M., Cavanagh, K., Gega, L.·2007·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Research into computer-aided psychotherapy is thriving around the world. Most of it concerns computer-aided cognitive-behavioural therapy (CCBT). A recent narrative review found 97 computer-aided psychotherapy systems from nine countries reported in 175 studies, of which 103 were randomised controlled trials. The rapid spread of the mass delivery of psychotherapy through CCBT, catalysed in the UK by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence's recommendation of two CCBT programmes and the Department of Health's CCBT implementation guidance, seems unprecedented. This editorial is a synopsis of the current status of CCBT and its future directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.041152

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychotherapy for depression is effective in primary care contexts.

    “psychotherapy for depression has been found to be effective in primary care contexts (5, 10, 11).”

    From Exploring the relationship between the acceptability of an internet-based intervention for depression in primary care and clinical outcomes: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (2019) · cites this paper as [10]

    The “Does CCBT Work?” section reports that patients with depression often improved more with computer-aided CBT than with waiting-list controls or usual care. The section on healthcare systems describes primary care trusts arranging access to CCBT, but does not report that depression psychotherapy was found effective specifically in primary care settings. The paper also addresses computer-aided therapy rather than psychotherapy generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A narrow focus on genital function or performance disregards the broader relational context and psychological variables that constitute a patient and partner's sexual satisfaction and quality of life.

    “A narrow focus on genital function or performance disregards the broader relational context and psychological variables that constitute a patient and partner's sexual satisfaction and quality of life.14,124,140”

    From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [140]

    The 'Does CCBT Work?' section mentions a computer-aided system for sexual dysfunction but does not discuss genital performance, partners, sexual satisfaction, or quality of life. Searches for those concepts found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The clinical relevance of changes in erectile function may be questioned if not accompanied by clinically meaningful improvements in overall sexual satisfaction and pleasure.

    “Furthermore, the clinical relevance of changes in erectile function may be questioned if not accompanied by clinically meaningful improvements in overall sexual satisfaction and pleasure.140”

    From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [140]

    The ‘DOES CCBT WORK?’ section (page not provided) mentions a computer-aided system for sexual dysfunction, but does not discuss erectile-function changes or whether sexual satisfaction and pleasure determine their clinical relevance. Searches for those terms and for clinically meaningful improvement found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Satisfaction has been found to help optimize intervention efficacy.

    “This is an important result because satisfaction has been found to help to optimize intervention efficacy (10, 45), and the results in the present study show that the same thing might occur with an IBI program for depression in primary care settings.”

    From Exploring the relationship between the acceptability of an internet-based intervention for depression in primary care and clinical outcomes: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (2019) · cites this paper as [10]

    The 'DOES CCBT WORK?' section discusses which computer-aided CBT programs are effective and the role of clinician support, but does not say that patient satisfaction helps optimize intervention efficacy. Searches for satisfaction and related terms found no passage in our copy addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Christensen, H., Griffiths, K. M., Korten, A., Christensen, H., Griffiths, K. M., Korten, A., et al et al (2004 (2004a a) ) Comparison of changes in anxiety and Comparison of changes in anxiety and depression symptoms of spontaneous users and trial depression symptoms of spontaneous users and trial participants of a CBTwebsite. participants of a CBTwebsite. Journal of Medical Internet Journal of Medical Internet Research, Research, 6 6, 46. , 46.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marks, I. M., Cavanagh, K., & Gega, L.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Marks, I. M.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-12
Volume
191
Issue
6
Pages
471-473
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2003458874
Cited by
165
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
NICE guidelines, digital mental health, future research directions
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depressive Disorder, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review