Cited by 42Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for psychological distress in patients with physical illnesses: a systematic review

McCombie, Andrew, Gearry, Richard, Andrews, Jane, Mikocka-Walus, Antonina, Mulder, Roger·2015·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

Whilst cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with chronic physical illnesses, there are barriers to its implementation which computerised CBT (CCBT) may overcome. We reviewed all studies of CCBT for treating psychological distress (PD) in chronic physical illness populations. Systematic searches were undertaken in July, 2013. All articles about CCBT for PD secondary to physical illness were included. Twenty-nine studies (thirty papers) were included. Overall, the quality of evidence was poor. Studies about irritable bowel syndrome demonstrated the best evidence. The evidence for CCBT in the treatment of PD in physical illness patients is modest, perhaps due to the seldom use of PD screening. More robust research designs including longer follow up periods are required. Nevertheless, no studies reported a negative effect of CCBT on any outcome measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-015-9420-0

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCombie, A., Gearry, R., Andrews, J., Mikocka-Walus, A., & Mulder, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2015-02-11
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
20-44
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W2165931088
Cited by
42
References
100
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Otago
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
psychological distress, chronic physical illness, irritable bowel syndrome, psychological screening, implementation barriers
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review