Cited by 117Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and Perception

Risk for depression and neural responses to fearful facial expressions of emotion

Open access
Chan, Stella W. Y., Norbury, Ray, Goodwin, Guy M., Harmer, Catherine J.·2009·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Depression is associated with neural abnormalities in emotional processing. Aims: This study explored whether these abnormalities underlie risk for depression. Method: We compared the neural responses of volunteers who were at high and low-risk for the development of depression (by virtue of high and low neuroticism scores; high-N group and low-N group respectively) during the presentation of fearful and happy faces using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Results: The high-N group demonstrated linear increases in response in the right fusiform gyrus and left middle temporal gyrus to expressions of increasing fear, whereas the low-N group demonstrated the opposite effect. The high-N group also displayed greater responses in the right amygdala, cerebellum, left middle frontal and bilateral parietal gyri to medium levels of fearful v. happy expressions. Conclusions: Risk for depression is associated with enhanced neural responses to fearful facial expressions similar to those observed in acute depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.047993

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People vulnerable to depression via the personality trait of neuroticism show enhanced amygdala responses to fearful faces.

    “Similarly, people vulnerable to depression via the personality trait of neuroticism show enhanced amygdala responses to fearful faces (Chan et al., 2009), disrupted coupling of amygdala and ACC in response to emotional faces (Cremers et al., 2010) and abnormal patterns of ACC response during categorisation and memory of negative words (Chan et al., 2008).”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Chan et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Fu CHY, Williams SCR, Cleare AJ, Brammar MJ, Walsh ND, Kim J, et al. Attenuation of the neural response to sad faces in major depression by antidepressant treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61: 877-89.
  2. Kendler KS, Gatz M, Gardner CO, Pedersen NL. Personality and major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63: 1113-20.
  3. Surgladze SA, Young AW, Senior C, Brebion G, Travis MJ, Phillips ML. Recognition accuracy and response bias to happy and sad facial expressions in patients with major depression. Neuropsychology 2004; 18: 212-8.
  4. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbon M, First MB. Structural Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV (SCID-I/P), Version II. American Psychiatric Press, 1995.
  5. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RD. STAI Manual. Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970.
  6. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: Three-dimensional Proportional System. Thieme Medical, 1988.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, S. W. Y., Norbury, R., Goodwin, G. M., & Harmer, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Harmer, Catherine J.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2009-02
Volume
194
Issue
2
Pages
139-145
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2132797873
Cited by
117
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Stanley Medical Research Institute
  • University of Oxford
  • Eisai
  • Servier
  • H. Lundbeck A/S (P1vital)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
depression risk, neuroticism, fearful faces, emotional face processing, amygdala, fusiform gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, cerebellum
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Cerebral Cortex, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Personality Assessment, Risk Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review