Cited by 146Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive and neurophysiological markers of ADHD persistence and remission

Open access

Abstract

Background: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) persists in around two-thirds of individuals in adolescence and early adulthood. Aims: To examine the cognitive and neurophysiological processes underlying the persistence or remission of ADHD. Method: Follow-up data were obtained from 110 young people with childhood ADHD and 169 controls on cognitive, electroencephalogram frequency, event-related potential (ERP) and actigraph movement measures after 6 years. Results: ADHD persisters differed from remitters on preparation-vigilance measures (contingent negative variation, delta activity, reaction time variability and omission errors), IQ and actigraph count, but not on executive control measures of inhibition or working memory (nogo-P3 amplitudes, commission errors and digit span backwards). Conclusions: Preparation-vigilance measures were markers of remission, improving concurrently with ADHD symptoms, whereas executive control measures were not sensitive to ADHD persistence/remission. For IQ, the present and previous results combined suggest a role in moderating ADHD outcome. These findings fit with previously identified aetiological separation of the cognitive impairments in ADHD. The strongest candidates for the development of non-pharmacological interventions involving cognitive training and neurofeedback are the preparation-vigilance processes that were markers of ADHD remission.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.145185

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kooij, 2010, DIVA 2.0 Diagnostic Interview Voor ADHD in Adults bij volwassenen [DIVA 2.0 Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults]
  2. 2008, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Diagnosis and Management of ADHD in Children, Young People and Adults

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 146

Metadata

Authors
Cheung, C. H. M., Rijsdijk, F., McLoughlin, G., Brandeis, D., Banaschewski, T., Asherson, P., & Kuntsi, J.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Kuntsi, Jonna
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-06
Volume
208
Issue
6
Pages
548-555
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W1828299506
Cited by
146
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13
FWCI
12.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Action Medical Research (GN1777)
  • Vifor Pharma
  • Medical Research Council (MR/N013182/1, G0300189, R01MH062873)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062873)
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD persistence, contingent negative variation, delta oscillations, reaction time variability, omission errors, executive function, Nogo-P3, IQ, EEG frequency, event-related potentials, cognitive training, neurofeedback, early adulthood
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Arousal, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Remission, Spontaneous, Disease Progression, Siblings, Actigraphy, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review