Cited by 198Schizophrenia research and treatmentEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Solving a weighty problem: Systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrition interventions in severe mental illness

Open access
Teasdale, Scott B., Ward, Philip B., Rosenbaum, Simon, Samaras, Katherine, Stubbs, Brendon·2017·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Nutrition interventions would appear fundamental for weight management and cardiometabolic risk reduction in people experiencing severe mental illness (SMI). Comprehensive evaluation of nutrition interventions is lacking. Aims: To subject randomised controlled trials of nutrition interventions in people with SMI to systematic review and meta-analysis, and to measure anthropometric and biochemical parameters and nutritional intake. Method: An electronic database search identified trials with nutrition intervention components. Trials were pooled for meta-analysis. Meta-regression analyses were performed on anthropometric moderators. Results: Interventions led to significant weight loss (19 studies), reduced body mass index (17 studies), decreased waist circumference (10 studies) and lower blood glucose levels (5 studies). Dietitian-led interventions (6 studies) and studies delivered at antipsychotic initiation (4 studies) had larger effect sizes. Conclusions: Evidence supports nutrition interventions as standard care in preventing and treating weight gain among people experiencing SMI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.177139

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teasdale, S. B., Ward, P. B., Rosenbaum, S., Samaras, K., & Stubbs, B.
Affiliations
  • Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Teasdale, Scott B.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2017-02
Volume
210
Issue
2
Pages
110-118
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2546592362
Cited by
198
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Western Sydney Local Health District
  • South Eastern Sydney Local Health District
  • King's College London
  • University of New South Wales
  • Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research
  • Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
nutrition interventions, severe mental illness, weight gain prevention, weight loss, body mass index, waist circumference, blood glucose, cardiometabolic risk, dietitian-led intervention, antipsychotic initiation, nutritional intake, anthropometric outcomes
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Mental Disorders, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Weight Loss, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review