Cited by 228Mental Health and Patient InvolvementSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

Researching recovery from psychosis: a user-led project

Open access
Pitt, Liz, Kilbride, Martina, Nothard, Sarah, Welford, Mary, Morrison, Anthony P.·2007·Psychiatric Bulletin

Abstract

Aims and Method: Involvement of service users in the research process and examination of recovery from psychosis are two topics that have generated recent interest within the research community. This user-led study examines the subjective experience of recovery in people with experience of psychosis. Seven interviews were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis and several themes emerged from the data. Results: Recovery from psychosis was found to be a complex and idiosyncratic process, which often involved rebuilding life, rebuilding self and hope for a better future (each of these themes consisted of sub-themes). Clinical Implications: The importance of continuity of care, the need for greater choice in approaches aimed at alleviating distress, access to stories of recovery and encouragement, and the importance of more individualised recovery care plans are among factors highlighted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/pb.bp.105.008532

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. TANDY, C. (2003) How do service users account for their recovery from serious mental illness? MSc Thesis, University of Sheffield.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pitt, L., Kilbride, M., Nothard, S., Welford, M., & Morrison, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Psychiatric Bulletin
Published
2007-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
55-60
ISSN
  • 0955-6036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1473
OpenAlex
W2109490393
Cited by
228
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
recovery from psychosis, service user involvement, lived experience of psychosis, hope, continuity of care, individualized care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review