Cited by 73Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Intelligent real-time therapy: Harnessing the power of machine learning to optimise the delivery of momentary cognitive–behavioural interventions

Kelly, James, Gooding, Patricia, Pratt, Daniel, Ainsworth, John, Welford, Mary, Tarrier, Nicholas·2012·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experience sampling methodology (ESM) [Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526-536] has been used to elucidate the cognitive-behavioural mechanisms underlying the development and maintenance of complex mental disorders as well as mechanisms involved in resilience from such states. We present an argument for the development of intelligent real-time therapy (iRTT). Machine learning and reinforcement learning specifically may be used to optimise the delivery of interventions by observing and altering the timing of real-time therapies based on ongoing ESM measures. AIMS: The aims of the present article are to outline the principles of iRTT and to consider how it would be applied to complex problems such as suicide prevention. METHODS: Relevant literature was identified through use of PychInfo. RESULTS: iRTT may provide an important and ecologically valid adjunct to traditional CBT, providing a means of balancing population-based data with individual data, thus addressing the "knowledge-practice gap" [Tarrier, N. (2010b). The cognitive and behavioral treatment of PTSD, what is known and what is known to be unknown: How not to fall into the practice gap. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17(2), 134-143] and facilitating the delivery of interventions in situ, thereby addressing the "therapy-real-world gap". CONCLUSIONS: iRTT may provide a platform for the development of individualised and multifaceted momentary intervention strategies that are ecologically valid and aimed at attenuating pathological pathways to complex mental health problems and amplifying pathways associated with resilience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638237.2011.638001

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, J., Gooding, P., Pratt, D., Ainsworth, J., Welford, M., & Tarrier, N.
Affiliations
  • Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Kelly, James
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2012-01-17
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
404-414
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W2161511153
Cited by
73
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, cognitive-behavioural intervention, reinforcement learning, machine learning, suicide prevention, personalized treatment, knowledge-practice gap, resilience, complex mental disorders, ecological validity
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Computers, Handheld, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review