Cited by 81Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Adolescent Development of Forebrain Stimulant Responsiveness: Insights from Animal Studies

LESLIE, FRANCES M., LOUGHLIN, SANDRA E., WANG, RUIHUA, PEREZ, LILYANNA, LOTFIPOUR, SHAHRDAD, BELLUZZIA, JAMES D.·2004·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Although initiation of drug abuse occurs primarily during adolescence, little is known about the central effects of nicotine and other abused drugs during this developmental period. Here evidence, derived from studies in rodents, is presented that suggests that tobacco use initiation during early adolescence results from a higher reward value of nicotine. The developmental profiles of the rewarding effects of other abused drugs, such as cocaine, differ from that of nicotine. Using in situ hybridization to quantify mRNA levels of the immediate early gene, cfos, the neuronal activating effects of nicotine in limbic and sensory cortices at different developmental stages are evaluated. Significant age changes in basal levels of cfos mRNA expression in cortical regions are observed, with a peak of responding of limbic cortices during early adolescence. A changing pattern of nicotine-induced neuronal activation is seen across the developmental spectrum, with unique differences in both limbic and sensory cortex responding during adolescence. An attentional set-shifting task was also used to evaluate whether the observed differences during adolescence reflect early functional immaturity of prefrontal cortices that regulate motivated behavior and psychostimulant responding. The finding of significantly better responding during adolescence suggests apparent functional maturity of prefrontal circuits and greater cognitive flexibility at younger ages. These findings in rodent models sugg…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1308.018

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LESLIE, F. M., LOUGHLIN, S. E., WANG, R., PEREZ, L., LOTFIPOUR, S., & BELLUZZIA, J. D.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
LESLIE, FRANCES M.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
1021
Issue
1
Pages
148-159
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2057092764
Cited by
81
References
8
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA013332, DA 13332)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
adolescent development, nicotine reward, cocaine, neuronal activation, limbic cortex, sensory cortex, prefrontal cortex maturation, set-shifting, cognitive flexibility, psychostimulant sensitivity, forebrain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Humans, Nicotine, Reward, Self Administration, Prosencephalon, Nicotinic Agonists, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review