The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Complaints in Survivors of Breast Cancer After Chemotherapy Compared With Age-Matched Controls: An Analysis From a Nationwide, Multicenter, Prospective Longitudinal Study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Cancer-related cognitive impairment is an important problem for patients with breast cancer, yet its trajectory is not fully understood. Some previous cancer-related cognitive impairment research is limited by heterogeneous populations, small samples, lack of prechemotherapy and longitudinal assessments, use of normative data, and lack of generalizability. We addressed these limitations in a large prospective, longitudinal, nationwide study. Patients and Methods: Patients with breast cancer from community oncology clinics and age-matched noncancer controls completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) at prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy and at a 6-month follow-up as an a priori exploratory aim. Longitudinal models compared FACT-Cog scores between patients and controls at the three assessments and adjusted for age, education, race, menopausal status, and baseline reading ability, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. A minimal clinically important difference cutoff determined percentages of impairment over time. Results: Of patients, 581 patients with breast cancer (mean age, 53 years; 48% anthracycline-based regimens) and 364 controls (mean age, 53 years) were assessed. Patients reported significantly greater cognitive difficulties on the FACT-Cog total score and four subscales from prechemotherapy to postchemotherapy compared with controls as well as from prechemotherapy to 6-month follow-up (all P < .001). Increased baseline anxiety, depression, and decreased cognitive reserve were significantly associated with lower FACT-Cog total scores. Treatment regimen, hormone, or radiation therapy was not significantly associated with FACT-Cog total scores in patients from postchemotherapy to 6-month follow-up. Patients were more likely to report a clinically significant decline in self-reported cognitive function than were controls from prechemotherapy to postchemotherapy (45.2% v 10.4%) and from prechemotherapy to 6-month follow-up (36.5% v 13.6%). Conclusion: Patients with breast cancer who were treated in community oncology clinics report substantially more cognitive difficulties up to 6 months after treatment with chemotherapy than do age-matched noncancer controls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
Flexible Imputation of Missing Data
van Buuren, S. (2012) · doi:10.1201/b11826 · Cited by 2,022
Stein, J., Luppa, M., Luck, T., Maier, W., Wagner, M., Daerr, M., van den Bussche, H., Zimmermann, T., Köhler, M., Bickel, H., et al. (2012) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/jgp.0b013e318209dd08 · Cited by 35
Cited by
Lange, M., Joly, F., Vardy, J., Ahles, T., Dubois, M., Tron, L., Winocur, G., De Ruiter, M. B., & Castel, H. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz410 · Cited by 667
Self-citationPsychological Aspects to Consider in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Dinapoli, L., Colloca, G., Di Capua, B., & Valentini, V. (2021) · Current Oncology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11912-021-01049-3 · Cited by 223
Dhillon, H. M., Tannock, I. F., Pond, G. R., Renton, C., Rourke, S. B., & Vardy, J. L. (2018) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-017-0656-6 · Cited by 88
Psychological Aspects of Breast Cancer
Penberthy, J. K., Stewart, A. L., Centeno, C. F., & Penberthy, D. R. (2023) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2023.04.010 · Cited by 48
Park, J.-H., Jung, Y. S., Jung, Y.-M., & Bae, S. H. (2019) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4546-x · Cited by 43
Bilenduke, E., Sterrett, J. D., Ranby, K. W., Borges, V. F., Grigsby, J., Carr, A. L., Kilbourn, K., & Lowry, C. A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-23793-7 · Cited by 39
Carroll, J. E., Nakamura, Z. M., Small, B. J., Zhou, X., Cohen, H. J., Ahles, T. A., Ahn, J., Bethea, T. N., Extermann, M., Graham, D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.00406 · Cited by 37
Self-citationGarland, S. N., Tulk, J., Savard, J., Rash, J. A., Browne, S., Urquhart, R., Seal, M., Thoms, J., & Laing, K. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.23.02330 · Cited by 29
Executive Functioning and Depressive Symptoms after Cancer: The Mediating Role of Coping
Radin, A., Ganz, P. A., Van Dyk, K., Stanton, A. L., & Bower, J. E. (2021) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000926 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Janelsins, M. C., Heckler, C. E., Peppone, L. J., Kamen, C., Mustian, K. M., Mohile, S. G., Magnuson, A., Kleckner, I. R., Guido, J. J., Young, K. L., Conlin, A. K., Weiselberg, L. R., Mitchell, J. W., Ambrosone, C. A., Ahles, T. A., & Morrow, G. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2017-02-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 506-514
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2564571185
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.