Cited by 260Body Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, DietElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

Usefulness of bioelectric impedance and skinfold measurements in predicting fat-free mass derived from total body potassium in children.

Schaefer, F, Georgi, M, Zieger, A, Schärer, K·1994·Pediatric Research

Abstract

Despite the increasing use of tetrapolar whole-body bioelectric impedance (BI) analysis in the assessment of body composition, its usefulness in estimating fat-free mass (FFM) has not been evaluated in comparison with conventional skinfold anthropometry in children. We therefore compared 1) the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of BI and skinfold measurements and the derived FFM estimates, and 2) the predictability of FFM as calculated from measurements of total body potassium (TBK) using 40K spectrometry by equations based on either BI or skinfold measurements in 112 healthy children, adolescents, and young adults aged 3.9 to 19.3 y. A best-fitting equation to predict TBK-derived FFM from BI and other potential independent predictors was developed and cross validated in two randomly selected subgroups of the study population by stepwise multiple regression analysis. Although the technical error associated with BI measurements was much smaller than that of skinfold measurements, the reproducibility of BI-derived FFM estimates (intraobserver coefficient of variation [CV], 0.39%; interobserver CV, 1.23%) was only slightly better than that of FFM estimates obtained by use of weight and two skinfold measurements (0.62% and 1.39%, respectively). The cross validation procedure yielded the following best-fitting prediction equation: FFM = 0.65 x (height2/impedance) + 0.68 x age + 0.15 (R2 = 0.975, root mean square error = 1.98 kg, CV = 5.8%, 95% limits of agreement = -11.1% to +12.4%). Conventional anthropometry, using published equations to estimate FFM from skinfolds, slightly over-estimated TBK-derived FFM, but predicted FFM with precision similar to the best-fitting equation involving BI. Previously published FFM equations incorporating BI predicted TBK-drived FFM with variable predictive precision and accuracy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1203/00006450-199405000-00016

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaefer, F., Georgi, M., Zieger, A., & Schärer, K.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Venue
Pediatric Research
Published
1994-05
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
617-624
ISSN
  • 0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0447
OpenAlex
W2011280222
Cited by
260
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
bioelectric impedance, skinfold thickness, fat-free mass, total body potassium, body composition, children, adolescents, measurement reproducibility, prediction equations, anthropometry
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Child, Child, Preschool, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Potassium, Reference Values, Regression Analysis, Skinfold Thickness, Reproducibility of Results, Electric Impedance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review