Cited by 933Embodied and Extended CognitionPhenomenology and Existential PhilosophyPhilosophy and History of Science

Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology

Turvey, M.T.·1992·Ecological Psychology

Abstract

Actions must be controlled prospectively. This requires that the behavioral possibilities of surface layouts and events be perceived. In this article, the ontolog- ical basis for an understanding of prospective control in realist terms is outlined. The foundational idea is that of affordances and the promoted ontology is materialist and dynamicist. It is argued that research in the ecological approach to prospective control is ultimately the search for objective laws. Because lawfulness is equated with real possibility, this amounts to the study of the affordances (the real possibilities) underlying prospective control and the circumstances that actualize them. The ontological assumptions and hypotheses bearing on this latter proposal are articulated. It is suggested that critical evaluation of the identified ontological themes may benefit the experimental and theoretical study of perception in the service of activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Affordances exist as dispositions in the environment that are complemented by dispositions of the animal.

    “Indeed, affordances exist as dispositions in the environment that are complemented with dispositions of the animal.”

    From Productive pluralism: The coming of age of ecological psychology. (2024) · cites this paper as Turvey, 1992

  • Turvey equated affordances with lawfulness, holding that real possibility is identical to lawfulness.

    “Real possibility is identical to lawfulness (Turvey, 1992, p. 177)”

    From Productive pluralism: The coming of age of ecological psychology. (2024) · cites this paper as Turvey, 1992

  • On the physical approach, ambient structure (a medium) is required to bring affordance and effectivity into informational contact and to actualize them.

    “Instead, on the physical approach, there needs to be ambient structure (i.e. a medium) available that brings affordance and effectivity in informational contact and to bring them to actualization.”

    From Productive pluralism: The coming of age of ecological psychology. (2024) · cites this paper as Turvey, 1992

  • On more ambitious physical proposals, the availability of specific affordances depends on circumstances, while their bare possibility is given with the laws of nature.

    “On more ambitious proposals, the availability of specific affordances depends on specific circumstances (i.e. initial conditions etc.), but their "bare possibility" is given with the laws of nature (Shaw, 2001;Turvey, 1992, see also Shaw et al., 2019).”

    From Productive pluralism: The coming of age of ecological psychology. (2024) · cites this paper as Turvey, 1992

  • Affordances and effectivities are duals that imply each other.

    “Importantly, affordances and effectivities are duals, they imply each other.”

    From Productive pluralism: The coming of age of ecological psychology. (2024) · cites this paper as Turvey, 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turvey, M. T.
Corresponding author
Turvey, M.T.
Venue
Ecological Psychology
Published
1992-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
173-187
ISSN
  • 1040-7413 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6969
OpenAlex
W2153296338
Cited by
933
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 32
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
affordances, prospective control, ontology, materialism, legality, real possibility, events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review