Cited by 72Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Delay and Death-Thought Accessibility: A Meta-Analysis

Steinman, Christopher T., Updegraff, John A.·2015·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

The dual-process component of Terror Management Theory (TMT) proposes that different types of threats lead to increases in death-thought accessibility (DTA) after different delay intervals. Experimental studies of terror management threats' effect on DTA were collected and coded for their use of explicitly death-related (vs. not explicitly death-related) threats, and for their use of delay and task-switching during the delay. Results reveal that studies using death-related threats achieved larger DTA effect-sizes when they included more task-switching or a longer delay between the threat and the DTA measurement. In contrast, studies using threats that were not explicitly death-related achieved smaller DTA effect-sizes when they included more task-switching between the threat and the DTA measurement. These findings provide partial support for the dual-process component's predictions regarding delay and DTA. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167215607843

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinman, C. T., & Updegraff, J. A.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Steinman, Christopher T.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2015-10-06
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
1682-1696
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2318761638
Cited by
72
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
terror management theory, death-thought accessibility, dual-process models, task switching, mortality salience
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Attitude to Death, Death, Defense Mechanisms, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Theory, Stress, Psychological, Thinking, Terrorism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review