Cited by 73Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesEating Disorders and BehaviorsGender Roles and Identity Studies

Clinical considerations in etiology, assessment, and treatment of men's muscularity-focused body image disturbance.

Parent, Mike C.·2013·Psychology of Men & Masculinity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025644

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 113 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parent, M. C.
Corresponding author
Parent, Mike C.
Venue
Psychology of Men & Masculinity
Published
2013-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
88-100
ISSN
  • 1524-9220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-151X
OpenAlex
W2330478267
Cited by
73
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Men & Masculinity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
body image disturbance, men's health, body image assessment, masculinity, clinical considerations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review