Cited by 258Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Fleeing the Body: A Terror Management Perspective on the Problem of Human Corporeality

Goldenberg, Jamie L., Pyszczynski, Tom, Greenberg, Jeff, Solomon, Sheldon·2000·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

From the perspective of terror management theory, the human body is problematic because it serves as a perpetual reminder of the inevitability of death. Human beings confront this problem through the development of cultural worldviews that imbue reality-and the body as part of that reality-with abstract symbolic meaning. This fanciful flight from death is in turn the psychological impetus for distancing from other animals and the need to regulate behaviors that remind us of our physical nature. This analysis is applied to questions concerning why people are embarrassed and disgusted by their bodies' functions; why sex is such a common source of problems, difficulties, regulations, and ritualizations; why sex tends to be associated with romantic love; and why cultures value physical attractiveness and objectify women. This article then briefly considers implications of this analysis for understanding psychological problems related to the physical body and cultural variations in the need to separate oneself from the natural world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327957pspr0403_1

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To be reminded that one is an animal is to be reminded that one is a bleeding, defecating, and ultimately expiring organism.

    “To be reminded that one is an animal is in effect to be reminded that one is a bleeding, defecating, and ultimately expiring organism”

    From Disgusting Bodies, Disgusting Religion: The Biology of Tantra (2011) · cites this paper as Goldenberg et al. 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldenberg, J. L., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S.
Affiliations
  • Boise State University (US)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Brooklyn College (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2000-08
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
200-218
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2116503764
Cited by
258
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
terror management theory, human corporeality, fear of death, cultural worldview, symbolic meaning, disgust, embarrassment, physiological function, sex, romantic love, physical attractiveness, objectification of women, human-animal distinction, cultural variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review