The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Sex Differences in Sexual Jealousy, Including Self-Report Data, Psychophysiological Responses, Interpersonal Violence, and Morbid Jealousy
Abstract
The specific innate modular theory of jealousy hypothesizes that natural selection shaped sexual jealousy as a mechanism to prevent cuckoldry, and emotional jealousy as a mechanism to prevent resource loss. Therefore, men should be primarily jealous over a mate's sexual infidelity and women over a mate's emotional infidelity. Five lines of evidence have been offered as support: self report responses, psychophysiological data, domestic violence (including spousal abuse and homicide), and morbid jealousy cases. This article reviews each line of evidence and finds only one hypothetical measure consistent with the hypothesis. This, however, is contradicted by a variety of other measures (including reported reactions to real infidelity). A meta-analysis of jealousy-inspired homicides, taking into account base rates for murder, found no evidence that jealousy disproportionately motivates men to kill. The findings are discussed from a social-cognitive theoretical perspective.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Anger was identified as a major component of the response to infidelity [25,26].”
From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cites
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
(1969) · Cited by 18,340
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
(2018) · Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.5505/kpd · Cited by 13,703
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment
Rever, G. W. (1972) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197211000-00011 · Cited by 8,446
The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992) · Cited by 5,222
Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204 · Cited by 4,253
Dollard, J., Miller, N. E., Doob, L. W., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/10022-000 · Cited by 3,920
PINKER, S. (1999) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08538.x · Cited by 3,738
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,657
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Baron, R. A., 1997, Social psychology
- Buunk, B., 1981, Alternative Lie estyles, 4, 357
- Chimbos, P. D., 1978, Marital violence: A study of inter-spouse homicide
- Daly, M., 1988, Homicide
- 10.2307/3096914 · DOI
- Frijda, N. H., 1986, The emotions
- Goldenberg, J. J., Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Guttmacher, M. S., 1955, Psychiatry and the law, 73
- Harlan, H., 1950, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 40, 736
- 10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1082 · DOI
- Horoszowski, P., 1975, Victimology: A new focus: Vol. 4. Violence and its victims, 3
- Lagache, D., 1947, La jalousie amoureuse. Psychologie descriptive et psychoanalys. 11. La jalousie recue
- Lobban, C. F., 1972, Law and anthropology in the Sudan (an analysis of homicide cases in Sudan)
- Mead, M., 1931, Woman's coming of age, 35
- Mullen, P. E., 1995, Hong Kong Journal of Psychiatry, 15, 1
- Parrott, W. G., 1991, The psychology of jealousy and envy, 3
- Rosenberg, M. S., 1997, Meta Win: Software for meta-analysis
- Salovey, P., 1991, The psychology of jealousy and envy, 271
- Sessar, K., 1975, Victimology: A new focus: Vol. 4. Violence and its victims, 29
- Sharpsteen, D. J., 1991, The pssychology of jealousy and envy, 31
- Siegel, L., 1992, Criminology
- Tanner, R. E. S., 1970, Homicide in Uganda, 1964: Crime in East Africa
- Turner, R. H., 1970, Family interaction
- Vauhkonen, K., 1968, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplements, 261
- Wilbanks, W., 1984, Murder in Miami
- Wilt, G. M. (1974). Toward an understanding of the social realities of participating in homicides. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699 · Cited by 1,509
Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate.
Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.628 · Cited by 804
“That does not mean that the mechanisms responsible for the computations performed under normal conditions are not modular in the sense of being function and input specific (see Harris, 2003, pp. 106 –107, for a similar confusion).”
BackgroundDevelopmental Dynamics: Toward a Biologically Plausible Evolutionary Psychology.
Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. G. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.819 · Cited by 323
“Without such empirical validation, how is one to know whether the responses of subjects on such paper-and-pencil tests really reflect how people actually behave in real-world situations? Indeed, in cases in which evolutionary psychologists predict differences in how men and women respond to sexual infidelity, no diffe…”
BackgroundThe reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences
Archer, J. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12507 · Cited by 291
“An earlier meta-analysis (Harris, 2003) found the sex difference (a medium effect in the male direction) to be restricted to studies using forced choices rather than continuous measures of the degree of upset to each possible scenario.”
BackgroundAllen, E. S., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., Snyder, D. K., Gordon, K. C., & Glass, S. P. (2005) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpi014 · Cited by 284
“We also do not review here the literature on jealousy (see Buunk & Dijkstra, 2000, and Harris, 2003 for reviews) because much of this literature does not assess the presence of actual EMI, assesses hypothetical responses, uses undergraduate populations, or focuses only on responses to perceived…”
BackgroundWhat Literature Teaches Us about Emotion
Hogan, P. C. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976773 · Cited by 258
Evolutionary Social Psychology
Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., & Schaller, M. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002021 · Cited by 67
Jealousy and the threatened self: Getting to the heart of the green-eyed monster
DeSteno, D., Valdesolo, P., & Bartlett, M. Y. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.626 · Cited by 213
“…to reproductive threats (see Buss et al., 1992) has encountered formidable theoretical and empirical difficulties that limit its viability (DeSteno, Barlett, & Salovey, in press; DeSteno et al., 2002; DeSteno & Salovey, 1996a; Harris, 2003; Harris & Christenfeld, 1996; Sabini & Green, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodEin‐Dor, T., Mikulincer, M., Doron, G., & Shaver, P. R. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610362349 · Cited by 221
“Harris, C.R. (2003). A review of sex differences in sexual jealousy, including self-report data, psychophysiological responses, inter-”
BackgroundSex differences in jealousy: a meta-analytic examination
Sagarin, B. J., Martin, A. L., Coutinho, S. A., Edlund, J. E., Patel, L., Skowronski, J. J., & Zengel, B. U. (2012) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.02.006 · Cited by 178
“When jealousy related to sexual and emotional infidelity is assessed using various non-forced-choice response formats, no sex differences emerge; men and women both report greater jealousy in response to sexual infidelity (DeSteno et al., 2002; Harris, 2003a).”
MethodArcher, J. E., & Webb, I. A. (2006) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.20146 · Cited by 175
Can evolutionary principles explain patterns of family violence?
Archer, J. E. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0029114 · Cited by 163
Keltner, D. J., & Lerner, J. S. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001009 · Cited by 164
Arnocky, S. A., Sunderani, S., Miller, J., & Vaillancourt, T. (2011) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01362.x · Cited by 158
“Indeed, it has been proposed that a female’s jealousy varies with the threat that she perceives in a male partner’s infidelity (Harris, 2003), and this jealousy would not be so if male extrapair mating had no deleterious effect on his partner.”
BackgroundPerceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy and mate-guarding behavior
Arnocky, S. A., Ribout, A., Mirza, R. S., & Knack, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1556/jep.12.2014.1.3 · Cited by 156
“…research has suggested that the ultimate sources of jealousy differ between the sexes (e.g., importance of sexual versus emotional infidelities; Harris, 2003), it is nevertheless clear that both men and women experience jealousy when threatened with a partner’s infidelity (ARNOCKY et al. 2012;…”
BackgroundMen and women show distinct brain activations during imagery of sexual and emotional infidelity
Takahashi, H., Matsuura, M., Yahata, N., Koeda, M., Suhara, T., & Okubo, Y. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.049 · Cited by 139
Swings and roundabouts: Management of jealousy in heterosexual ‘swinging’ couples
de Visser, R. O., & McDONALD, D. (2006) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466606x143153 · Cited by 136
Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2016) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.004 · Cited by 133
Culture, Gender, and Men's Intimate Partner Violence
Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (2008) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00080.x · Cited by 127
“In many Western cultures that stress romantic ideals of love, jealousy can play a big role in conflict, and jealousy has been shown to be an important motive in intimate partner violence (Buss, 2000; Daly & Wilson, 1988; Dutton, 1998; Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundGoetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Weekes‐Shackelford, V. A., Euler, H. Α., Hoier, S., Schmitt, D. P., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2004) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.028 · Cited by 128
Li, N. P., Valentine, K. A., & Patel, L. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.005 · Cited by 124
“…present in both countries, an evolutionary explanation for mating-duration dependent, sex-differentiated mate preferences would be further bolstered (though sex-differentiated mate preferences are also generally compatible with social structural accounts; e.g., Harris, 2003; Wood & Eagly, 2002).”
BackgroundAvi Besser, A., & Priel, B. (2008) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00546.x · Cited by 121
Schützwohl, A., & Koch, S. (2004) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.03.006 · Cited by 118
“This research has been primarily devoted to testing the hypothesis that the female JM responds with stronger emotions to a mate’s emotional infidelity, whereas the male JM generates stronger emotions in response to a mate’s sexual infidelity (see Harris, 2003, for a critical review).”
BackgroundJealousy: Novel methods and neural correlates.
Harmon‐Jones, E., Peterson, C. K., & Harris, C. R. (2009) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0014117 · Cited by 115
Self-citationWest, T. V., Popp, D., & Kenny, D. A. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207311199 · Cited by 115
“…can be used to examine a number of relationship topics, such as gender differences and similarities in sexual jealousy and infidelity (e.g., Harris, 2003), which focuses largely on heterosexual relationships, and studies of domestic violence, where much of the focus has been on…”
BackgroundWomen's Sexual Strategies: The Evolution of Long-Term Bonds and Extrapair Sex
Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006) · Annual Review of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/10532528.2006.10559837 · Cited by 117
“Although the evidence is somewhat mixed (e.g., Harris, 2003), there may be a dedicated psychology in men that leads them to be sexually jealous and to engage in mate guarding (see, e.g., Buss & Haselton, 2005).”
BackgroundSabini, J., & Green, M. C. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204264012 · Cited by 111
“Typically, studies find that a small majority of men find sexual infidelity more distressing than emotional infidelity, whereas a large majority of women find emotional infidelity more distressing than sexual infidelity (see Harris, 2000, 2003, for reviews).”
BackgroundInfluentialMeta-Analyses of Sex Differences in Responses to Sexual Versus Emotional Infidelity
Carpenter, C. J. (2011) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684311414537 · Cited by 106
“Other researchers working from a social–cognitive perspective have argued that such sex differences do not exist (Harris, 2003a) or that they can be explained by prevailing stereotypes about the co-occurrence of the two types of infidelity at once (DeSteno & Salovey, 1996).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialUpset Over Sexual versus Emotional Infidelity Among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Adults
Frederick, D. A., & Fales, M. R. (2014) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0409-9 · Cited by 102
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Dixon, S. (2009) · Cited by 92
Buunk, A. P., Solano, A. C., Lloréns, R. Z., & Navarro, P. G. (2011) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022111403664 · Cited by 97
“Research on jealousy from an evolutionary perspective has in the past decades mainly focused on gender differences in the importance of emotional versus sexual jealousy (i.e., on the different responses to an emotional attachment between a third person and one’s partner and a “pure” sexual affair between a third perso…”
BackgroundReconsidering Evolved Sex Differences in Jealousy: Comment on Harris (2003)
Sagarin, B. J. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_5 · Cited by 89
“(p. 122) Harris (2003) also outlines two weaker forms of the JSIM hypothesis.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Price of Distrust: Trust, Anxious Attachment, Jealousy, and Partner Abuse
Rodriguez, L. M., DiBello, A. M., Øverup, C. S., & Neighbors, C. (2015) · Partner Abuse · doi:10.1891/1946-6560.6.3.298 · Cited by 95
“Research has noted strong associations between jealousy and relationship conflict, aggression, and violence (Buss, 2000; Hansen, 1991; Harris, 2003; Langhinrichsen-Rohling, McCullars, & Misra, 2012; Stets & Pirog-Good, 1987).”
BackgroundMenstrual Cycle and Facial Preferences Reconsidered
Harris, C. R. (2010) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9772-8 · Cited by 89
“…domain specific mechanisms is only one of a number of possible ways in which natural selection might have shaped human psychology (Caporael 2000; Harris 2003; Miller and Fishkin 1997; Wood and Eagly 2002) According to alternative perspectives, natural selection may instead have created…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationRisk factors for intimate partner violence during pregnancy and postpartum
Hellmuth, J. C., Gordon, K. C., Stuart, G. L., & Moore, T. M. (2012) · Archives of Women s Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-012-0309-8 · Cited by 88
“Jealousy and suspicion of infidelity Research suggests that individuals may be more prone to violent behavior in the presence of jealousy or suspicion of infidelity, especially during pregnancy (Gangestad et al. 2002; Gelles 2001; Goetz and Shackelford 2009; Harris 2003).”
BackgroundCross, C., & Campbell, A. C. (2011) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.012 · Cited by 86
Sex differences in jealousy: Information search and cognitive preoccupation
Schützwohl, A. (2005) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.024 · Cited by 86
“…stronger emotions to a mate s emotional infidelity whereas the male EJM generates stronger emotions in response to a mate s sexual infidelity (see Harris, 2003, for a critical review; and Hofhansl, Vitouch, & Voracek, 2004, for a more recent and complete meta-analysis that supports the…”
BackgroundLeeker, O., & Carlozzi, A. (2014) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00331.x · Cited by 84
“, 1996; Harris, 2003), sexual orientation (Harris, 2003), age (Harris, 2003; Sabini & Green, 2004), histo ry of past infidelity experiences (Harris, 2002; Harris, 2003), and use of continuous meas ures (DeSteno et al., 2002; Green & Sabini, 2006; Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSex Differences in Jealousy in Response to Actual Infidelity
Edlund, J. E., Heider, J. D., Scherer, C. R., Farc, M.-M., & Sagarin, B. J. (2006) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470490600400137 · Cited by 83
“Although studies using this forced-choice methodology generally find that a higher proportion of men than women choose the sexual infidelity as more distressing (Harris, 2003), reliance on this methodology has led to a number of serious”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialForbes, G. B., Jobe, R. L., White, K. B., Bloesch, E. K., & Adams‐Curtis, L. E. (2005) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1292-6 · Cited by 81
“There is a well-known literature from evolutionary psychology (e.g., Buss, Larsen, Westen, & Semmelroth, 1992) that argues men are more upset by their partners’ sexual infidelity, whereas women are more upset by their partner’s emotional infidelity (for an insightful critique of this literature, see Harris, 2003 ).”
BackgroundHarris, C. R. (2003) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00112 · Cited by 77
Self-citationSchadenfreude and Gluckschmerz
Smith, R. H., & DIJK, W. W. V. (2018) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073918765657 · Cited by 76
“, & Harris, C. R. (2015). Envy across adulthood: The what”
BackgroundInfluentialLove and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences
Rokach, A., & Chan, S. H. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20053904 · Cited by 77
“Anger was identified as a major component of the response to infidelity [25,26].”
BackgroundSex differences in jealousy: the processing of cues to infidelity
Schützwohl, A. (2005) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.09.003 · Cited by 74
“…stronger emotions to a mate’s emotional infidelity, whereas the male JM generates stronger emotions in response to a mate’s sexual infidelity (see Harris, 2003, for a critical review; and Hofhansl, Vitouch, & Voracek, 2004, for a more recent and complete meta-analysis that supports the…”
BackgroundRelationship Power and Betrayal Experience as Predictors of Reactions to Infidelity
Berman, M. I., & Frazier, P. A. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205277209 · Cited by 72
“Many researchers, in fact, have begun to develop evolutionary psychological theories that suggest that men and women should respond similarly to threats and actual instances of infidelity by their partners for a variety of reasons (Harris, 2003b; Miller & Fishkin, 1997).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialJealousy and Relationship Closeness
Attridge, M. D. (2013) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244013476054 · Cited by 71
Forced‐response in online surveys: Bias from reactance and an increase in sex‐specific dropout
Stieger, S., Reips, U., & Voracek, M. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20651 · Cited by 71
Una revisión sistemática de los celos románticos en la relación de pareja
Martínez-León, N. C., Peña, J. J., Salazar, H., García, A., & Sierra, J. (2017) · Terapia psicológica · doi:10.4067/s0718-48082017000200203 · Cited by 11
Becker, D. V., Sagarin, B. J., Guadagno, R. E., Millevoi, A., & Nicastle, L. D. (2004) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00096.x · Cited by 71
“The evolutionary explanation for sex differences in jealousy has received strong support (Buss et al., 1992, 1999; Buunk et al., 1996) and equally strong criticism (DeSteno & Salovey, 1996; Harris & Christenfeld, 1996; see Harris, 2003, for a review).”
BackgroundInfluentialInfidelity in Dating Relationships
McAnulty, R. D., & Brineman, J. (2007) · Annual Review of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/10532528.2007.10559848 · Cited by 71
“Gender differences in response to the hypothetical scenarios are inconsistent; where such differences do occur, they are only modest (see Harris, 2003; Nannini & Myers, 2000; Sheppard et al., 1995; Yarab et al., 1999).”
BackgroundEkman's basic emotions: Why not love and jealousy?
Sabini, J. P., & Silver, M. (2005) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930441000481 · Cited by 76
Fagundes, C. P., & Diamond, L. M. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_13 · Cited by 71
Harris, C. R., & Prouvost, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094597 · Cited by 63
Self-citationSex Differences in Jealousy: An Evolutionary Perspective on Online Infidelity
Guadagno, R., & Sagarin, B. J. (2010) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00674.x · Cited by 61
“The sex difference appears to be robust and replicable using the forced-choice response format (Harris, 2003), but is more elusive using continuous measures (Harris, 2003, 2005; Sagarin, 2005).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialGoldenberg, J. L., Landau, M. J., Pyszczynski, T., Cox, C. R., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Dunnam, H. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203256880 · Cited by 55
“…in women’s responses across the two studies also may reflect greater complexity in the forces affecting women’s responses to infidelity (see Harris, 2003; Hupka & Ryan, 1990) and also the inconsistent findings in assessments of women’s physiological reactions to infidelity reviewed in…”
BackgroundResultAngelo, F. N., Miller, H. E., Zoellner, L. A., & Feeny, N. C. (2008) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2007.02.002 · Cited by 55
“As suggested by both DeSteno and Salovey (1996) and Harris (2003) , in a forced-choice situation, choosing one option inappropriately indicates decreased interest in another option when more complex relationships may exist.”
MethodJealousy as a Specific Emotion: The Dynamic Functional Model
Chung, M., & Harris, C. R. (2018) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073918795257 · Cited by 56
“…cultures and time periods, legal systems have granted special dispensation to acts committed out of jealousy due to the belief that one had little power to resist the impulses brought on by circumstances such as finding a spouse in the arms of a lover (Daly, Wilson, & Weghorst, 1982; Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSexual Strategies Theory: Built for the Short Term or the Long Term?
Smiler, A. P. (2010) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9817-z · Cited by 56
“Also unclear are the criteria by which the focus should be placed on desired vs. actual behavior (see also Harris 2003 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialMale and Female Jealousy, Still More Similar than Different: Reply to Sagarin (2005)
Harris, C. R. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_6 · Cited by 54
“…female college students did not differ in their reports of the degree to which a mate’s actual sexual betrayal had damaged the primary relationship (Hansen, 1987); and (c) men and women did not differ in their reactions to the different aspects of a mate’s actual infidelity (Harris, 2002; 2003a).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationDefining and Distinguishing Sexual and Emotional Infidelity
Guitar, A. E., Geher, G., Kruger, D. J., Garcia, J. R., Fisher, M. L., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2017) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9432-4 · Cited by 77
da Costa, A. L., Sophia, E. C., Sanches, C. C., Tavares, H., & Zilberman, M. L. (2014) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.017 · Cited by 57
Can manipulations of cognitive load be used to test evolutionary hypotheses?
Barrett, H. C., Frederick, D. A., Haselton, M. G., & Kurzban, R. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.513 · Cited by 52
“…sexual than emotional infidelity, whereas women should be more upset by emotional than sexual infidelity (e.g., DeSteno et al., 2002, p. 1114; C. R. Harris, 2003, 2005, p. 77, Table 1), but these predictions do not follow from the evolutionary logic described above nor were they advanced by Buss…”
BackgroundInfluentialImaging, Behavior and Endocrine Analysis of “Jealousy” in a Monogamous Primate
Maninger, N., Mendoza, S. P., Williams, D. R., Mason, W. A., Cherry, S. R., Rowland, D. J., Schaefer, T., & Bales, K. L. (2017) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2017.00119 · Cited by 51
“Jealousy may have given a fitness advantage to humans in our ancestral environment; current evidence shows that culture also plays a role (Harris, 2003).”
Harris, C. R., & Darby, R. S. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444323542.ch23 · Cited by 50
“…jealousy One possible model of jealousy is that it has a primitive or ‘‘core’’ form that can be elicited by a primary appraisal of threat that arises from input as simple as the perception that a loved one has turned their attention to a potential rival and away from the self (Harris, 2003a).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationFooling Around on Facebook: The Perceptions of Infidelity Behavior on Social Networking Sites
Cravens, J. D., & Whiting, J. (2016) · Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy · doi:10.1080/15332691.2014.1003670 · Cited by 25
“Empirical studies have been conducted that have both confirmed and called into question the validity of the evolutionary psychological perspective’s ability to explain gender differences in interpreting infidelity (see Buss et al.; Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundPerrin, P. B., Heesacker, M., Tiegs, T. J., Swan, L. K., Lawrence, A. W., Smith, M. B., Carrillo, R. J., Cawood, R. L., & Mejia-Millan, C. M. (2010) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9804-4 · Cited by 50
“Researchers have pointed out that the two perspectives can be compatible when gender-role conformity is viewed as a mechanism of evolution proposed by evolutionary psychologists (e.g., Eagly and Wood 1999; Harris 2003; Miller and Fishkin 1997).”
BackgroundSex differences in jealousy: Misinterpretation of nonsignificant results as refuting the theory
Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2009) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01210.x · Cited by 52
“Some critics have argued that the sex difference in jealousy is an artifact of the forcedchoice method and that the results do not replicate with continuous measures (DeSteno, Bartlett, Braverman, & Salovey, 2002; Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodTreger, S., & Sprecher, S. (2010) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.516845 · Cited by 49
“This belief may lead men to be more distressed by sexual infidelity (DeSteno & Salovey, 1996; Harris, 2003; Harris & Christenfeld, 1996).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialTickling the monster: Jealousy induction in relationships
Fleischmann, A. A., Spitzberg, B. H., Andersen, P. A., & Roesch, S. C. (2005) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407505049321 · Cited by 49
“At least one meta-analysis casts doubt on sex-specific predictions regarding jealousy experiences (Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundMiller, S. L., & Maner, J. K. (2008) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.013 · Cited by 48
“However, reactions to an imagined infidelity may not perfectly parallel responses to real infidelities (Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialEvolutionary Social Psychology
Maner, J. K., & Menzel, A. J. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop205023 · Cited by 50
Gender and jealousy: Stories of infidelity
Sabini, J. P., & Silver, M. (2005) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930441000490 · Cited by 47
Envy Across Adulthood: The What and the Who
Henniger, N., & Harris, C. R. (2015) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1088440 · Cited by 41
“Such a view would be consistent with a number of theories of distinct emotions (e.g., Frijda, 1986; Frijda & Parrott, 2011; Roseman, 2011; see also Harris, 2003, for similar analysis of jealousy).”
BackgroundSelf-citationIslam, M. J., Mazerolle, P., Broidy, L. M., & Baird, K. M. (2017) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260517730029 · Cited by 48
“A partner’s pregnancy may also induce suspicion of infidelity in abusive males (Goetz, Shackelford, Romero, Kaighobadi, & Miner, 2008; Harris, 2003; Hellmuth, Gordon, Stuart, & Moore, 2013).”
BackgroundGreen, M. C., & Sabini, J. (2006) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.330 · Cited by 68
Kuhle, B. X. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.034 · Cited by 45
Schützwohl, A. (2004) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470490400200118 · Cited by 46
“…an impressive body of research that has been primarily devoted to testing the hypothesis that the female JM responds with stronger negative emotions to a mate’s emotional infidelity whereas the male JM generates stronger negative emotions in response to a mate’s sexual infidelity (Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundBrase, G., Adair, L. E., & Monk, J. K. (2014) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491401200106 · Cited by 39
“Sociosexuality, for instance, was not at all associated with differences in reactions to infidelity situations (contrary to the predictions made by Harris, 2003a).”
BackgroundInfluentialBirnbaum, G. E., Svitelman, N., Bar-Shalom, A., & Porat, O. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208319692 · Cited by 44
“…self-enhancement; Berman & Frazier, 2005; Gagné & Lydon, 2003; Lydon, 1999), although it is debated whether men and women differ in emotional responses to different types of threats (e.g., distress over sexual vs. emotional infidelity; see Harris, 2003, 2005; Sagarin, 2005, for reviews).”
BackgroundLickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. G. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.866 · Cited by 40
“Without such empirical validation, how is one to know whether the responses of subjects on such paper-and-pencil tests really reflect how people actually behave in real-world situations? Indeed, in cases in which evolutionary psychologists predict differences in how men and women respond to sexual infidelity, no diffe…”
BackgroundPsychological Flexibility under Fire: Testing the Incremental Validity of Experiential Avoidance
Vaughan-Johnston, T. I., Quickert, R. E., & MacDonald, T. K. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.011 · Cited by 39
“3 Furthermore, jealousy has particular importance to our sample of college-age individuals, as young adults tend to experience more romantic jealousy (Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundJealousy at Work: A Tripartite Model
Andiappan, M., & Dufour, L. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0299 · Cited by 40
Scelza, B. A. (2013) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.11.003 · Cited by 39
“We also know from previous work that there is significant variation in the magnitude of the sex difference that is seen, as well as variation in how upset men and women are to different types of jealousy when it is measured continuously (Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodSex differences in response to imagining a partner’s heterosexual or homosexual affair
Confer, J. C., & Cloud, M. D. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.007 · Cited by 39
“One limitation concerns the validity of responses to the imagined infidelity scenarios, given that this methodology does not directly measure participants’ actual behavior (Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPartner Violence and Sexual Jealousy in China
Wang, T., Parish, W. L., Laumann, E. O., & Luo, Y. (2009) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801209334271 · Cited by 39
Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology: Moving Forward
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2013) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0315-y · Cited by 40
Attitudes toward sex and relationships: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships
de Visser, R. O., Badcock, P. B., Simpson, J. M., Grulich, A. E., Smith, A. M. A., Richters, J., & Rissel, C. E. (2014) · Sexual Health · doi:10.1071/sh14099 · Cited by 42
Zengel, B. U., Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.001 · Cited by 38
“However, when reactions to sexual and emotional infidelity were assessed separately on continuous measures, the hypothesized sex difference often failed to appear (Harris, 2002, 2003) including within a large random sample (Green & Sabini, 2006).”
BackgroundTagler, M. J. (2010) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550610374367 · Cited by 35
“It has been suggested that because they have relatively little experience in long-term committed relationships, their responses to hypothetical infidelity is largely based on societal expectations and hypothetical cognitive reasoning (Harris, 2003; Sabini & Green, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialRelationship quality influences attitudes toward and perceptions of infidelity
Silva, A., Saraiva, M., Albuquerque, P. B., & ARANTES, J. (2017) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/pere.12205 · Cited by 33
“On the other hand, other researchers have argued that there are no differences between males and females (Harris, 2003) or that any differences can be explained by prevailing stereotypes about the co-occurrence of the two types of infidelity for men and women.”
BackgroundSex differences in jealousy: The case of Internet infidelity
Groothof, H. A. K., Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2009) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407509348003 · Cited by 33
“Harris (2003, 2005), for instance, observed that results obtained by the forced-choice method hardly correlated with results obtained by other self-report measures (e.g. Likert scales and psychophysiological measures; see also Sagarin, 2005).”
ResultLishner, D. A., Nguyen, S., Stocks, E., & Zillmer, E. (2008) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470490800600412 · Cited by 37
Gunderson, P. R., & Ferrari, J. R. (2008) · North American journal of psychology · Cited by 33
Bisexuals and the sex differences in jealousy hypothesis
Scherer, C. R., Akers, E., & Kolbe, K. L. (2013) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407513481446 · Cited by 33
“Additionally, individuals in homosexual relationships tend to be more focused on the emotional aspects of the infidelity than the sexual aspects (Harris, 2002, 2003), regardless of the gender of the same-sex relationship (men with men or women with women).”
BackgroundKim, S., Jung, D., & Lee, J.-S. (2013) · Service Business · doi:10.1007/s11628-012-0174-6 · Cited by 28
Adult Attachment and Personality as Predictors of Jealousy in Romantic Relationships
Richter, M., Schlegel, K., Thomas, P., & Troche, S. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861481 · Cited by 39
“Hence, jealousy is a usually unpleasant but often adaptive phenomenon, with the underlying desire to maintain the relationship with the partner (Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundA Reproductive Threat-Based Model of Evolved Sex Differences in Jealousy
Sagarin, B. J., Becker, D. V., Guadagno, R. E., Wilkinson, W. W., & Nicastle, L. D. (2012) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491201000307 · Cited by 32
“In contrast, studies that have examined women’s and men’s jealousy using continuous measures have often produced nonsignificant results, leading some critics to argue that the sex difference is an artifact of the forced-choice method (DeSteno, Bartlett, Braverman, and Salovey, 2002; Harris, 2003).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEffect of Cheating Experience on Attitudes toward Infidelity
Sharpe, D. I., Walters, A. S., & Goren, M. J. (2013) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-013-9169-2 · Cited by 38
Moral judgment of close relationship behaviors
Selterman, D. F., & Koleva, S. P. (2014) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407514554513 · Cited by 34
“However, there is a debate regarding the cause and interpretation of this difference (Harris, 2000, 2003).”
BackgroundProximal Foundations of Jealousy: Expectations of Exclusivity in the Infant’s First Year of Life
Hart, S. (2016) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073915615431 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, C. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Harris, Christine R.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 102-128
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2074804043
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 19.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH061626, R01-MH61626)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- sexual jealousy, emotional jealousy, sex differences, cuckoldry, resource loss, sexual infidelity, emotional infidelity, domestic violence, marital violence, morbid jealousy, psychophysiological responses, social cognitive theory
- MeSH terms
- Affective Symptoms, Arousal, Extramarital Relations, Female, Gender Identity, Homicide, Humans, Jealousy, Male, Domestic Violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review