Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Study on the Effect of Vitamin D3Supplementation on Skeletal Muscle Morphology and Vitamin D Receptor Concentration in Older Women

Open access
Ceglia, Lisa, Niramitmahapanya, Sathit, da Silva Morais, Mauricio, Rivas, Donato A., Harris, Susan S., Bischoff-Ferrari, Heike, Fielding, Roger A., Dawson-Hughes, Bess·2013·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
DOI 10.1210/jc.2013-2820
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

CONTEXT: Studies examining whether vitamin D supplementation increases muscle mass or muscle-specific vitamin D receptor (VDR) concentration are lacking. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether vitamin D₃ 4000 IU/d alters muscle fiber cross-sectional area (FCSA) and intramyonuclear VDR concentration over 4 months. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in a single center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 21 mobility-limited women (aged ≥ 65 years) with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels of 22.5 to 60 nmol/L. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline and 4-month FCSA and intramyonuclear VDR were measured from vastus lateralis muscle cross-sections probed for muscle fiber type (I/IIa/IIx) and VDR using immunofluorescence. RESULTS: At baseline, mean (±SD) age was 78 ± 5 years; body mass index was 27 ± 5 kg/m², 25OHD was 46.3 ± 9.5 nmol/L, and a short physical performance battery score was 7.95 ± 1.57 out of 12. At 4 months, 25OHD level was 52.5 ± 17.1 (placebo) vs 80.0 ± 11.5 nmol/L (vitamin D [VD]; P < .01), and change in 25OHD level was strongly associated with percent change in intramyonuclear VDR concentration-independent of group (r = 0.87, P < .001). By treatment group, percent change in intramyonuclear VDR concentration was 7.8% ± 18.2% (placebo) vs 29.7% ± 11.7% (VD; P = .03) with a more pronounced group difference in type II vs I fibers. Percent change in total (type I/II) FCSA was -7.4% ± 18.9% (placebo) vs 10.6% ± 20.0% (VD; P = .048). CONCLUSION: Vitamin D₃ supplementation increased intramyonuclear VDR concentration by 30% and increased muscle fiber size by 10% in older, mobility-limited, vitamin D-insufficient women. Further work is needed to determine whether the observed effect of vitamin D on fiber size is mediated by the VDR and to identify which signaling pathways are involved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2013-2820

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ceglia, L., Niramitmahapanya, S., da Silva Morais, M., Rivas, D. A., Harris, S. S., Bischoff-Ferrari, H., Fielding, R. A., & Dawson-Hughes, B.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Publisher
The Endocrine Society
Published
2013-12
Volume
98
Issue
12
Pages
E1927-E1935
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
DOI
10.1210/jc.2013-2820
OpenAlex
W2008744282
Cited by
257
References
4
FWCI
14.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.