Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CSF tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 231 correlates with cognitive decline in MCI subjects

Buerger, K., Teipel, S. J., Zinkowski, R., Blennow, K., Arai, H., Engel, R., Hofmann–Kiefer, K., McCulloch, C., Ptok, U., Heun, R., Andreasen, N., DeBernardis, J., Kerkman, D., Moeller, H.- J., Davies, P., Hampel, H.·2002·Neurology

Abstract

In this longitudinal study of 77 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the authors analyzed whether levels of tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 231 (p-tau(231)) in CSF correlate with progression of cognitive decline. High CSF p-tau(231) levels at baseline, but not total tau protein levels, correlated with cognitive decline and conversion from MCI to AD. Independently, old age and APOE-epsilon 4 carrier status were predictive as well. Our data indicate that an increased p-tau(231) level is a potential risk factor for cognitive decline in patients with MCI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.59.4.627

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520400044042 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01178-2 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/ana.111 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0197-4580(98)00071-2 · DOI
  5. 10.1385/MN:24:1-3:087 · DOI
  6. Consensus Report of the Working Group on “Molecular and Biochemical Markers of Alzheimer’s Disease.” The Ronald and Nancy Reagan Research Institute of the Alzheimer’s Association and the National Institute on Aging Working Group. Neurobiol Aging 1998;19:109–116. · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1987.tb02906.x · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0197-4580(99)00107-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00617-5 · DOI
  10. 10.1006/exnr.2000.7501 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Buerger, K., Teipel, S. J., Zinkowski, R., Blennow, K., Arai, H., Engel, R., Hofmann–Kiefer, K., McCulloch, C., Ptok, U., Heun, R., Andreasen, N., DeBernardis, J., Kerkman, D., Moeller, H. J., Davies, P., & Hampel, H.
Affiliations
From the Dementia Research Section and Memory Clinic (Drs. Buerger, Teipel, Moeller, Engel, and Hampel), Alzheimer Memorial Center, Department of Psychiatry, and the Department of Anesthesiology (Dr. Hofmann–Kiefer), Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany; Molecular Geriatrics Corporation (Drs. Zinkowski, DeBernardis, and Kerkman, and C. McCulloch), Vernon Hills, IL; the Department of Clinical Neuroscience (Dr. Blennow), Unit of Neurochemistry, University of Göteborg, Sahlgren’s University...
Venue
Neurology
Published
2002-08-27
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
627-629
ISSN
  • 0028-3878
  • 1526-632X
Cited by
187
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review