Cited by 385Skin and Cellular Biology ResearchAdvancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryDermatology and Skin Diseases

Patterned acquisition of skin barrier function during development

Hardman, Matthew J., Sisi, Paraskevi, Banbury, David N., Byrne, Carolyn·1998·Development

Abstract

Skin barrier function is conferred by the outer layer of epidermis, the stratum corneum, and is essential for terrestrial life. Quantitative trans-epidermal water loss assays show that barrier forms late in embryogenesis, permitting the foetus to survive a terrestrial environment at birth. Using qualitative in situ assays for skin permeability, we show that barrier forms in a patterned manner late in mouse gestation. Barrier forms at specific epidermal sites, then spreads around the embryo as a moving front. The moving front of permeability change is accompanied by multiple changes in the outer, stratum corneum-precursor cells. We use the permeability assays to show that final stages of cornified envelope assembly are coordinated with initial stages of barrier formation. Hence the whole-mount permeability assays record developmental acquisition of a known, essential component of the adult barrier. We demonstrate the authenticity of the whole-mount assays after maternal glucocorticoid therapy (known to accelerate barrier formation) and in additional species including the rat where barrier formation is well characterized by TEWL assay (Aszterbaum, M., Menon, G. K., Feingold, K. R. and Williams, M. L. Pediatr. Res. 31, 308-317). The demonstration of patterned barrier formation in other species suggests patterned change as the universal mode of embryonic barrier acquisition. These results highlight the importance of patterning as a mode of epidermal maturation during development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.125.8.1541

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hardman, M. J., Sisi, P., Banbury, D. N., & Byrne, C.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Byrne, Carolyn
Venue
Development
Published
1998-04-15
Volume
125
Issue
8
Pages
1541-1552
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2097754683
Cited by
385
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
skin barrier function, stratum corneum, embryonic development, transepidermal water loss, skin permeability, epidermal maturation, rats
MeSH terms
Epidermal Cells, Filaggrin Proteins, Animals, Betamethasone, Epidermis, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Gestational Age, Intermediate Filament Proteins, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Mice, Inbred ICR, Permeability, Pregnancy, Skin, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Species Specificity, Body Patterning, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review