Neuroendocrinology of social behavior
Open accessAbstract
Discovering the hormonal and neural mechanisms that promote affiliative social behavior is a high priority in behavioral neuroscience. Although studies with standard laboratory rodents have afforded many important insights, exciting advances are also occurring through comparative research with nonstandard species that vary in sociality or form socially monogamous pair bonds, work that is often informed by an explicitly evolutionary perspective. Research with prairie voles has examined the roles of sex steroid hormones, adrenal glucocorticoids, oxytocin family peptides, and dopamine in the formation of monogamous pairs. Corticosterone facilitates pairing by males but inhibits it in females, vasopressin (acting via the V1a receptor) and oxytocin facilitate pairing, and dopamine in the nucleus accumbens also facilitates pairing. Research with zebra finches is testing the limits of generality of these mechanisms, and has shown how sex steroid effects early in life along with social experience lead to an adult's sex preference in a pairing partner. Estrogen manipulations during the embryonic or nestling periods result in females that prefer to pair with other females. An all-female social environment can reinforce such effects, and can also produce males and females that will pair with either sex. Research with multiple species of estrildid finches is revealing the contributions of peptidergic and dopaminergic mechanisms to the evolution of species differences in whether animals are gregarious or territorial. Mechanisms for and responses to vasotocin (avian vasopressin) in the septal region of the brain are predicted by sociality in this group of birds.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The neuroendocrine pathways coordinating numerous social traits are highly conserved, including the coordinating roles of AVP and OT.
“Although no animal model can fully capture the sophisticated complexity of human social behavior, the neuroendocrine pathways coordinating numerous social traits are highly conserved (7, 42), including the coordinating roles of AVP and OT.”
From Endocrine Disruption of Vasopressin Systems and Related Behaviors (2017) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love
Sue Carter, C. (1998) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(98)00055-9 · Cited by 1,425 · see citing works
Pubertal hormones organize the adolescent brain and behavior
Sisk, C. L., & Zehr, J. L. (2005) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2005.10.003 · Cited by 1,082 · see citing works
A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles
Winslow, J. T., Hastings, N., Carter, C. S., Harbaugh, C. R., & Insel, T. R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365545a0 · Cited by 948 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Infusion of these peptides into the brain greatly shortens the cohabitation time necessary for selective affi liation to form, and, conversely, infusion of receptor antagonists prevents selective affi liation even after more extended periods of cohabitation (Insel and Hulihan 1995; Liu et al. 2001; Williams et al. 199…”
BackgroundInfluentialInsel, T. R., & Hulihan, T. J. (1995) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.109.4.782 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Young, L. J., Nilsen, R., Waymire, K. G., MacGregor, G. R., & Insel, T. R. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23475 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Aragona, B. J., Liu, Y., Yu, Y. J., Curtis, J. T., Detwiler, J. M., Insel, T. R., & Wang, Z. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1613 · Cited by 473 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A series of experiments with male prairie voles has shown that dopamine D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens are critical for pairing; agonists facilitate pairing, and antagonists inhibit it (Aragona et al. 2006; Gingrich et al. 2000).”
BackgroundDe Vries, G. J., & Panzica, G. C. (2006) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.050 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Anatomy and neurochemistry of the pair bond
Young, L. J., Murphy Young, A. Z., & Hammock, E. A. D. (2005) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20771 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Cushing, B. S., Okorie, U., & Young, L. J. (2003) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2826.2003.01097.x · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Balthazart J, Adkins-Regan E. 2002. Sexual differentiation of brain and behavior in birds. In: Pfaff D, Arnold AP, Etgen AM, Fahrbach SE, Rubin RT, eds. Hormones, Brain and Behavior, Vol 4. San Diego: Academic Press. p 223-301.
- Griffi th SC, Owens IP, Thuman KA. 2002. Extra pair paternity in birds: A review of interspecifi c variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195-2212.
- Newman SW. 2002. Pheromonal signals access the medial extended amygdala: One node in a proposed social behavior network. In: Pfaff DW, Arnold AP, Etgen AM, Fahrbach SE, Rubin RT, eds. Hormones, Brain and Behavior, Vol 2. Amsterdam: Academic Press (Elsevier). p 17-32.
- Tsutsui K, Matsunaga M, Miyabara H, Ukena K. 2006. Neurosteroid biosynthesis in the quail brain: A review. J Exp Zool A 305:733-742.
- Zann RA. 1996. The Zebra Finch. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Albers, H. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.07.001 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Intranasal administration of oxytocin: behavioral and clinical effects, a review
Veening, J. G., & Olivier, B. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.04.012 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Effects of gendered behavior on testosterone in women and men
van Anders, S. M., Steiger, J., & Goldey, K. L. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1509591112 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the motivational forces that drive social behaviors
Caldwell, H. K., & Albers, H. E. (2015) · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2015_390 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Caldwell, H. K. (2012) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1704-0_12 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Sex Differences in the Embryonic Development of the Central Oxytocin System in Mice
Tamborski, S., Mintz, E. M., & Caldwell, H. K. (2016) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/jne.12364 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Endocrine Disruption of Vasopressin Systems and Related Behaviors
Patisaul, H. B. (2017) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2017.00134 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“Although no animal model can fully capture the sophisticated complexity of human social behavior, the neuroendocrine pathways coordinating numerous social traits are highly conserved (7, 42), including the coordinating roles of AVP and OT.”
BackgroundDay, N. F., Saxon, D., Robbins, A., Harris, L., Nee, E., Shroff-Mehta, N., Stout, K., Sun, J., Lillie, N., Burns, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.191510 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adkins-Regan, E.
- Venue
- ILAR Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-14
- ISSN
- 1084-2020 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170536751
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- ILAR Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Keywords
- social behavior, monogamy, pair bonding, Microtus ochrogaster, zebra finch, estrildid finches, sex hormones, corticosterone, oxytocin, vasopressin, V1a receptor, dopamine, nucleus accumbens, social experience, sex preference, sociality, territoriality, gregariousness, evolution of social behavior, comparative neuroendocrinology
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Arvicolinae, Female, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Neuropeptides, Neurosecretory Systems, Oxytocin, Pair Bond, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Social Behavior, Finches
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
