Cited by 41Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Patients with Diabetes in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Attendance and Exercise Capacity

ARMSTRONG, MARNI J., MARTIN, BILLIE-JEAN, ARENA, ROSS, HAUER, TRINA L., AUSTFORD, LESLIE D., STONE, JAMES A., AGGARWAL, SANDEEP, SIGAL, RONALD J.·2014·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: Diabetes increases mortality after myocardial infarction, but participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces this risk. Our objectives were to examine whether attendance at CR and changes in cardiorespiratory fitness differed according to diabetic status and sex. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients referred for CR in Calgary between 1996 and 2010. Cardiorespiratory fitness in metabolic equivalents (METs) was estimated by maximal exercise testing at baseline, at the end of the 12-wk CR program, and 1-yr after CR. RESULTS: Among 7036 nondiabetic and 1546 diabetic patients who started, 84.9% of nondiabetic versus 79.5% of diabetic patients completed CR (P < 0.0001). The difference between diabetic and nondiabetic patients was greater in women (81.7% vs 72.1%, P < 0.0001) than that in men (86.0% vs 82.5%, P = 0.004). Patients without diabetes were more likely to return for the 1-yr assessment (53.7% vs 42.7%, P < 0.0001), and nondiabetic women were more likely than diabetic women to attend the 1-yr follow-up (44.3% vs 31.7%, P < 0.0001). Change in cardiorespiratory fitness from baseline to 12 wk was +1.0 METs in nondiabetic men, +0.9 METS in diabetic men, +0.9 METs in nondiabetic women, and +0.7 METs in diabetic women (within-group change; P = 0.0009). Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness at 1 yr compared with baseline were +0.9, +0.6, +0.9, and +0.5 METS, respectively (within-group change, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes, especially females, were less likely than patients without diabetes to complete CR and attend follow-up. Among patients who attended 1-yr follow-up, changes in cardiorespiratory fitness were not as well maintained in diabetic patients as in nondiabetic patients. Identifying barriers and targeting CR adherence interventions to patients with diabetes may help improve outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000000189

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ARMSTRONG, M. J., MARTIN, B.-J., ARENA, R., HAUER, T. L., AUSTFORD, L. D., STONE, J. A., AGGARWAL, S., & SIGAL, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2014-05
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
845-850
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996869133
Cited by
41
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, cardiac rehabilitation, cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise adherence, sex differences, myocardial infarction, follow-up attendance, metabolic equivalents, exercise testing
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Energy Metabolism, Exercise Test, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Patient Compliance, Physical Fitness, Respiration, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Exercise Tolerance, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review