The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Media and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia
Abstract
This paper compares electoral outcomes of 1999 parliamentary elections in Russia among geographical areas with differential access to the only national TV channel independent from the government. It was available to three-quarters of Russia's population and its signal availability was idiosyncratic, conditional on observables. Independent TV decreased aggregate vote for the government party by 8.9 percentage points, increased the combined vote for major opposition parties by 6.3 percentage points, and decreased turnout by 3.8 percentage points. The probability of voting for opposition parties increased for individuals who watched independent TV even controlling for voting intentions measured one month before elections. (JEL D72, L82, P26)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Enikolopov et al. (2011) find that ̂ β fe = 6 . 65 (s.e.= 1 . 40 ).”
From Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (2020) · cites this paper as Enikolopov et al. (2011)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gentzkow, M. (2006) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.121.3.931 · Cited by 842 · cited 2×
“In this case, rational viewers will not fully discount information provided by the media and use it for Bayesian updating of their beliefs about political parties (e.g., Gentzkow and Shapiro 2006; Petrova 2008; Scott Gehlbach and Sonin 2009).”
The Immensely Inflated News Audience: Assessing Bias in Self-Reported News Exposure
Prior, M. (2009) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfp002 · Cited by 561
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.2307/2586120 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00186-4 · DOI
- 10.1086/426699 · DOI
- 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124309 · DOI
- 10.1162/00335530360698469 · DOI
- 10.1086/377116 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003055409990219 · DOI · Paper page
- Enikolopov Ruben, 2011, American Economic Review. http://www.aeaweb.org/ articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer., 101, 3253, 10.1257/aer.101.7.3253 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00201.x · DOI
- 10.2747/1060-586X.21.3.226 · DOI
- 10.1257/0895330042162313 · DOI
- 10.1086/499414 · DOI
- 10.3982/ECTA7195 · DOI
- 10.1257/000282806776157551 · DOI
- 10.1257/app.1.2.35 · DOI
- 10.1093/pan/mpp017 · DOI
- 10.2747/1060-586X.20.4.285 · DOI
- 10.1093/restud/rdq037 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0007123405000013 · DOI
- 10.1257/0895330042632690 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/4148520 · DOI
- 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.577 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.99.5.2120 · DOI
- 10.1257/app.1.4.1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1086/269363 · DOI
- 10.1086/652903 · DOI
- 10.1162/003355304772839560 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0007123405000116 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767
Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
de Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfœuille, X. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20181169 · Cited by 5,031
The welfare effects of social media
Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20190658 · Cited by 857
Bias in Cable News: Persuasion and Polarization
Martin, G. J., & Yurukoglu, A. (2017) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20160812 · Cited by 666
The Effect of Newspaper Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics
Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. M., & Sinkinson, M. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.7.2980 · Cited by 497
Social Media and Protest Participation: Evidence From Russia
Enikolopov, R., Makarin, A., & Petrova, M. (2020) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta14281 · Cited by 489
Self-citationTwo-way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
de Chaisemartin, C., & D'Haultfoeuille, X. (2019) · doi:10.3386/w25904 · Cited by 350
Fuzzy differences-in-differences
de Chaisemartin, C., & D’HaultfŒuille, X. (2018) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdx049 · Cited by 324
3G Internet and Confidence in Government
Guriev, S., Melnikov, N., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2021) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaa040 · Cited by 255
Self-citationThe Impact of Media Censorship: 1984 or Brave New World?
Chen, Y., & Yang, D. Y. (2019) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20171765 · Cited by 250
How Sudden Censorship Can Increase Access to Information
HOBBS, W. R., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2018) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055418000084 · Cited by 241
Resilience to Online Censorship
Roberts, M. E. (2020) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032837 · Cited by 131
A Tear in the Iron Curtain: The Impact of Western Television on Consumption Behavior
Bursztyn, L., & Cantoni, D. (2016) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00522 · Cited by 116
The unintended consequences of internet diffusion: Evidence from Malaysia
Miner, L. (2015) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.10.002 · Cited by 113
Trial by Fire: A Natural Disaster's Impact on Support for the Authorities in Rural Russia
Lazarev, E., Sobolev, A., Soboleva, I. V., & Sokolov, B. (2014) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887114000215 · Cited by 106
Sometimes Less Is More: Censorship, News Falsification, and Disapproval in 1989 East Germany
Gläßel, C., & Paula, K. (2020) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12501 · Cited by 98
Reflections on Putin and the Media
Gehlbach, S. (2010) · Post-Soviet Affairs · doi:10.2747/1060-586x.26.1.77 · Cited by 97
Pan, J. (2017) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1181525 · Cited by 92
The Welfare Effects of Social Media
Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2019) · doi:10.3386/w25514 · Cited by 81
Communication power struggles on social media: A case study of the 2011–12 Russian protests
Spaiser, V., Chadefaux, T., Donnay, K., Russmann, F., & Helbing, D. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2017.1308288 · Cited by 77
Selection Neglect and Political Beliefs
Brundage, M., Little, A. T., & You, S. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/p49at · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., & Zhuravskaya, E.
- Affiliations
- New Economic School, Office 922, Nakhimovsky pr. 47, Moscow, 117418, Russia.
- New Economic School, Office 905, Nakhimovsky pr. 47, Moscow 117418, Russia.
- Paris School of Economics and New Economic School, Office 104A, 48 Bd. Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3253-3285
- ISSN
- 0002-8282
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
