Cited by 106Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesSchool Choice and Performance

Testing for Racial Differences in the Mental Ability of Young Children

Fryer, Roland G, Levitt, Steven D·2013·American Economic Review

Abstract

Using a new nationally representative dataset, we find minor differences in test outcomes between black and white infants that disappear with a limited set of controls. However, relative to whites, all other races lose substantial ground by age two. Combining our estimates with results in prior literature, we show that a simple model with assortative mating fits our data well, implying that differences in children's environments between racial groups can fully explain gaps in intelligence. If parental ability influences a child's test scores both genetically and through environment, then our findings are less informative and can be reconciled with a wide range of racial differences in inherited intelligence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.103.2.981

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

  • Cites a retracted work: 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.1.307

    Info

    The cited work was retracted on 2021-08-23 (notice 10.1177/00332941211042507), not before this paper was published (2013-04-01).

    Cited work 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.1.307 · retracted 2021-08-23 · notice 10.1177/00332941211042507 · this paper published 2013-04-01

1 of 1

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bayley Nancy, 1949, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 75, 165
  2. Birns Beverly, 1972, Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 18, 53
  3. Escalona Sibylle K, 1961, Child Development, 32, 597
  4. Fryer Roland G., Jr., 2013, American Economic Review. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer., 103, 981, 10.1257/aer.103.2.981 · DOI
  5. 10.2307/1127491 · DOI
  6. Ireton Harold, 1970, Child Development, 41, 937
  7. National Center for Education Statistics., 1998, Kindergarten Class of, 1998
  8. 10.2307/1127725 · DOI
  9. 10.2307/1130096 · DOI
  10. Rushton J. Philippe., 1995, International Data for, 1989
  11. Scott R., 1997, HOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 28, 116
  12. 10.1037/0012-1649.19.5.731 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2013-04-01
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
981-1005
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121459665
Cited by
106
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
14.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
racial differences in intelligence, young children, black-white gap, assortative mating, parental ability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review