The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Media Censorship: 1984 or Brave New World?
Abstract
Media censorship is a hallmark of authoritarian regimes. We conduct a field experiment in China to measure the effects of providing citizens with access to an uncensored internet. We track subjects’ media consumption, beliefs regarding the media, economic beliefs, political attitudes, and behaviors over 18 months. We find four main results: (i) free access alone does not induce subjects to acquire politically sensitive information; (ii) temporary encouragement leads to a persistent increase in acquisition, indicating that demand is not permanently low; (iii) acquisition brings broad, substantial, and persistent changes to knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and intended behaviors; and (iv) social transmission of information is statistically significant but small in magnitude. We calibrate a simple model to show that the combination of low demand for uncensored information and the moderate social transmission means China’s censorship apparatus may remain robust to a large number of citizens receiving access to an uncensored internet. (JEL C93, D72, D83, L82, L86, L88, P36)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Chen and Yang show that Chinese college students, who have grown up with filtered Internet, have very little demand for access to uncensored Internet because of a lack of knowledge of the value of inaccessible information (187).”
From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [187]
Citations
Cites
How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression
KING, G., PAN, J., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055413000014 · Cited by 2,415 · cited 1×
“4 King, Pan, and Roberts ( 2013, 2014 show that the censorship algorithm prioritizes to eliminate information related to collective actions.”
Anderson, M. L. (2008) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214508000000841 · Cited by 2,410 · cited 3×
“E categories are summarized by a z -score index, weighting by the inverse covariance of the standardized variables, following Anderson ( 2008 ) .”
InfluentialThe Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting
DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187 · Cited by 1,602
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2006) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/499414 · Cited by 1,274
Good-Bye Lenin (or Not?): The Effect of Communism on People's Preferences
Alesina, A., & Fuchs‐Schündeln, N. (2007) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.97.4.1507 · Cited by 1,262
Mullainathan, S., & Shleifer, A. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828054825619 · Cited by 1,236
Microeconomics of technology adoption
Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124433 · Cited by 1,055
Charness, G., & Uri Gneezy, B. (2008) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta7416 · Cited by 717
Propaganda and Conflict: Evidence from the Rwandan Genocide *
Yanagizawa-Drott, D. (2014) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju020 · Cited by 715
Karlan, D., Stephen, S., Welch, K., & Quddus, S. (2009) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.1.2.35 · Cited by 667
Gentzkow, M. A., & Shapiro, J. M. (2005) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w11664 · Cited by 631
Persuasion: Empirical Evidence
Dellavigna, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2010) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124309 · Cited by 615
Lorentzen, P. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12065 · Cited by 602
Cantoni, D., Chen, Y., Yang, D. Y., Yuchtman, N., & Zhang, Y. J. (2014) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/690951 · Cited by 580
Self-citationMedia and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia
Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.7.3253 · Cited by 568
Radio and the Rise of The Nazis in Prewar Germany *
Adena, M., Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., Santarosa, V., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjv030 · Cited by 546
Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China's Great Firewall
(2018) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · doi:10.23943/9781400890057/html · Cited by 508
Revealed Preference, Rational Inattention, and Costly Information Acquisition
Caplin, A., & Dean, M. R. W. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20140117 · Cited by 496
Government control of the media
Gehlbach, S. G., & Сонин, К. И. (2014) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.004 · Cited by 432
Short-Run Subsidies and Long-Run Adoption of New Health Products: Evidence From a Field Experiment
Pascaline Dupas, Y. (2014) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta9508 · Cited by 428
Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation
King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251722 · Cited by 422
Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda
Qin, B., Strömberg, D., & Wu, Y. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.1.117 · Cited by 353
Coffman, K. B., Coffman, L. C., & Ericson, K. M. M. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2503 · Cited by 287
Democracy's Past and Future: Authoritarianism's Last Line of Defense
Schedler, A. (2010) · Journal of democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.0.0137 · Cited by 267
How Sudden Censorship Can Increase Access to Information
HOBBS, W. R., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2018) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055418000084 · Cited by 241
Strömberg, D. (2015) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041101 · Cited by 221
Opium for the Masses: How Foreign Media Can Stabilize Authoritarian Regimes
Kern, H., & Hainmueller, J. (2009) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpp017 · Cited by 214
Protests as Strategic Games: Experimental Evidence from Hong Kong's Antiauthoritarian Movement*
Cantoni, D., Yang, D. Y., Yuchtman, N., & Zhang, Y. J. (2019) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz002 · Cited by 209
Self-citationQin, B., Strömberg, D., & Wu, Y. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20170947 · Cited by 201
Nazi indoctrination and anti-Semitic beliefs in Germany
Voigtländer, N., & Voth, H. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414822112 · Cited by 172
Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification
Dowding, K. M., & Kuran, T. (1997) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/591776 · Cited by 163
Shadmehr, M., & Bernhardt, D. (2014) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20130221 · Cited by 140
On the endogeneity of political preferences: Evidence from individual experience with democracy
Fuchs‐Schündeln, N., & Schündeln, M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa0880 · Cited by 125
Pan, J. (2017) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1181525 · Cited by 92
Information from Abroad: Foreign Media, Selective Exposure and Political Support in China
Huang, H., & Yeh, Y. (2017) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123416000739 · Cited by 88
The Political Economy of the Mass Media
Prat, A., & Strömberg, D. (2025) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036232962.n2 · Cited by 80
Media, Protest Diffusion, and Authoritarian Resilience
Huang, H., Boranbay-Akan, S., & Huang, L. (2016) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2016.25 · Cited by 76
Abramitzky, R., & Sin, I. (2014) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/jeea.12093 · Cited by 54
2010 Circumvention Tool Usage Report
Roberts, H., Zuckerman, E., York, J. C., Faris, R. M., & Palfrey, J. G. (2011) · Cited by 14
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Levy, R. (2021) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20191777 · Cited by 624
Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media
Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239 · Cited by 560
Designing Information Provision Experiments
Haaland, I., Roth, C., & Wohlfart, J. (2023) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20211658 · Cited by 577
Why Does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests versus Surveillance and Propaganda
Qin, B., Strömberg, D., & Wu, Y. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.1.117 · Cited by 353
Misinformation During a Pandemic
Bursztyn, L., Rao, A., Roth, C., & Yanagizawa-Drott, D. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27417 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y., & Yang, D. Y.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Chen, Yuyu
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2019-06-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2294-2332
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2947564500
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 54.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Social Sciences › Law › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
- Keywords
- media censorship, authoritarian regimes, political information acquisition, political attitudes, political behavior, information needs, field experiments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review