Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,226

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach

Camerer, Colin, Lovallo, Dan·1999·American Economic Review

Abstract

Psychological studies show that most people are overconfident about their own relative abilities, and unreasonably optimistic about their futures (e.g. Shelly E. Taylor and J.D. Brown, 1988; Neil D. Weinstein, 1980). When assessing their position in a distribution of peers on almost any positive trait-- like driving ability (Ola Svenson, 1981 ), income prospects, or longevity-- a vast majority of people say they are above the average, although of course, only half can be (if the trait is symmetrically distributed). \nThis paper explores whether optimistic biases could plausibly and predictably influence economic behavior in one particular setting-- entry into competitive games or markets. Many empirical studies show that most new businesses fail within a few years. For example, using plant level data from the U.S. Census of Manufacturers spanning 1963-1982, Timothy Dunne et al. (1988) estimated that 61.5 percent of all entrants exited within five years and 79.6 percent exited within 10 years. Most of these exits are failures (see also Dunne et al., 1989a, 1989b; D. Shapiro and R.S. Khemani, 1987).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.89.1.306

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Allen Douglas W, 1995, American Economic Review
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.366 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.366 · Paper page
  3. 10.2307/1891116 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/2555454 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kahneman Daniel, 1979, S. Makridakis and S. C. Wheelwright, eds., Forecasting . TIMS Studies in Management Science, 313
  7. 10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1404 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1086/261276 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1007/BF01410098 · doi:10.1007/bf01410098
  10. Rapoport Seale, 1998, Management Science, 129
  11. 10.1086/296325 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/0167-7187(87)90003-8 · DOI
  13. 10.1006/obhd.1995.1100 · doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1100
  14. 10.1016/0001-6918(81)90005-6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Waldman Michael, 1994, American Economic Review, 482

Cited by

See all 2,226

Metadata

Authors
Camerer, C., & Lovallo, D.
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
306-318
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076823895
Cited by
2,226
References
4
FWCI
106.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.89.1.306
The paper
Camerer, C., & Lovallo, D. (1999). Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.306

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.