Cited by 70Higher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

Borrowing Trouble? Human Capital Investment with Opt-In Costs and Implications for the Effectiveness of Grant Aid

Open access
Marx, Benjamin M., Turner, Lesley J.·2018·American Economic Journal: Applied Economics

Abstract

We estimate the effect of grant aid on City University of New York (CUNY) students' borrowing and attainment using a regression discontinuity/kink design based on the federal Pell Grant formula. Each dollar of grant aid reduces loans by $1.80 among borrowers. We only find crowd-out of this magnitude in colleges that, like CUNY, “offer” no loan aid and require students to opt into borrowing. We develop and empirically support a model that shows opt-in or other fixed borrowing costs can lead grants to crowd out large amounts of loan aid, lowering some students' attainment by reducing their liquid resources. (JEL D14, I22, I23, I26, J24)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/app.20160127

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students who just barely qualify for the minimum Pell Grant were less likely to take out a larger student loan, potentially having less cash on hand than students who did not qualify for the minimum Pell.

    “Marx and Turner (2018) find that students who just barely qualify for the minimum Pell Grant were less likely to take out a larger student loan, meaning they could actually have less cash on hand than students who did not qualify for the minimum Pell.”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Marx and Turner (2018)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marx, B. M., & Turner, L. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
163-201
ISSN
  • 1945-7782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7790
OpenAlex
W2793258051
Cited by
69
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
28.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Economic Journal Applied Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • City University of New York
  • Australian Government
  • Federal Student Aid
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
student loan borrowing, grants, crowding out, Pell grants, academic performance, higher education funding, City University of New York, student debt

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review