The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Field Experiments with Firms
Open accessAbstract
We discuss how the use of field experiments sheds light on long-standing research questions relating to firm behavior. We present insights from two classes of experiments—within and across firms—and draw common lessons from both sets. Field experiments within firms generally aim to shed light on the nature of agency problems. Along these lines, we discuss how field experiments have provided new insights on shirking behavior and the provision of monetary and nonmonetary incentives. Field experiments across firms generally aim to uncover firms' binding constraints by exogenously varying the availability of key inputs such as labor, physical capital, and managerial capital. We conclude by discussing some of the practical issues researchers face when designing experiments and by highlighting areas for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2003) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/376950 · Cited by 3,777
The Provision of Incentives in Firms
Prendergast, C. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.37.1.7 · Cited by 3,338
On the Size Distribution of Business Firms
Lucas, R. E. (1978) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003596 · Cited by 3,236
Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much?
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067 · Cited by 3,186
Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00253 · Cited by 2,913
Field Experiments of Discrimination in the Market Place
Riach, P. A., & Rich, J. (2002) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00080 · Cited by 911
Cited by
Underinvestment in a Profitable Technology: The Case of Seasonal Migration in Bangladesh
(2014) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta10489 · Cited by 710
(2014) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · Cited by 464
Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.11.002 · Cited by 312
No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for public service delivery
Ashraf, N., Bandiera, O., & Jack, B. K. (2014) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.014 · Cited by 101
Self-citationOn the effects of incentive framing on bribery: evidence from an experiment in Burkina Faso
Armantier, O., & Boly, A. (2014) · Economics of Governance · doi:10.1007/s10101-013-0135-0 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Bandiera, O., Barankay, I., & Rasul, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2011-08-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 63-82
- ISSN
- 0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3122874513
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 31.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field Experiments with Firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/jep.25.3.63
- The paper
- Bandiera, O., Barankay, I., & Rasul, I. (2011). Field Experiments with Firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.3.63
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.