Cited by 351Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealthcare Systems and Technology

A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication

Open access
Wade, Victoria A, Karnon, Jonathan, Elshaug, Adam G, Hiller, Janet E·2010·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telehealth is the delivery of health care at a distance, using information and communication technology. The major rationales for its introduction have been to decrease costs, improve efficiency and increase access in health care delivery. This systematic review assesses the economic value of one type of telehealth delivery--synchronous or real time video communication--rather than examining a heterogeneous range of delivery modes as has been the case with previous reviews in this area. METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken for economic analyses of the clinical use of telehealth, ending in June 2009. Studies with patient outcome data and a non-telehealth comparator were included. Cost analyses, non-comparative studies and those where patient satisfaction was the only health outcome were excluded. RESULTS: 36 articles met the inclusion criteria. 22(61%) of the studies found telehealth to be less costly than the non-telehealth alternative, 11(31%) found greater costs and 3 (9%) gave the same or mixed results. 23 of the studies took the perspective of the health services, 12 were societal, and one was from the patient perspective. In three studies of telehealth to rural areas, the health services paid more for telehealth, but due to savings in patient travel, the societal perspective demonstrated cost savings. In regard to health outcomes, 12 (33%) of studies found improved health outcomes, 21 (58%) found outcomes were not significantly different, 2(6%) found that telehealth was less effective, and 1 (3%) found outcomes differed according to patient group. The organisational model of care was more important in determining the value of the service than the clinical discipline, the type of technology, or the date of the study. CONCLUSION: Delivery of health services by real time video communication was cost-effective for home care and access to on-call hospital specialists, showed mixed results for rural service delivery, and was not cost-effective for local delivery of services between hospitals and primary care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-10-233

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Economic analyses have shown that the cost effectiveness of synchronous telemedicine varies widely according to the delivery setting.

    “Economic analyses have shown that cost effectiveness of synchronous telemedicine vary widely according to the delivery setting [8].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Roine R Ohinmaa A Hailey D Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature Cmaj 2001 165 765 771 11584564 PMC81454
  2. Drummond M O'Brien B Stoddard G Torrance G Methods for the economic evaluation of healthcare programmes 1997 2 Oxford: Oxford University Press
  3. Loane MA Oakley A Rademaker M Bradford N Fleischl P Kerr P Wootton R A cost-minimization analysis of the societal costs of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: results from a randomized controlled trial in New Zealand J Telemed Telecare 2001 7 233 238 10.1258/1357633011936453 11506759 · DOI
  4. Johnston B Outcomes of the kaiser permanente tele-home health research project Archives of Family Medicine 2000 9 40 45 10.1001/archfami.9.1.40 10664641 · DOI
  5. Wootton R Bloomer SE Corbett R Eedy DJ Hicks N Lotery HE Mathews C Paisley J Steele K Loane MA Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis Bmj 2000 320 1252 1256 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1252 10797038 PMC27370 · DOI
  6. Bergmo TS An economic analysis of teleconsultation in otorhinolaryngology J Telemed Telecare 1997 3 194 199 10.1258/1357633971931156 9614733 · DOI
  7. Persaud DD Jreige S Skedgel C Finley J Sargeant J Hanlon N An incremental cost analysis of telehealth in Nova Scotia from a societal perspective J Telemed Telecare 2005 11 77 84 10.1258/1357633053499877 15829051 · DOI
  8. Loane MA Bloomer SE Corbett R Eedy DJ Evans C Hicks N Jacklin P Lotery HE Mathews C Paisley J A randomized controlled trial assessing the health economics of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: an urban versus rural perspective J Telemed Telecare 2001 7 108 118 10.1258/1357633011936246 11331049 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dowie R Mistry H Young TA Weatherburn GC Gardiner HM Rigby M Rowlinson GV Franklin RC Telemedicine in pediatric and perinatal cardiology: economic evaluation of a service in English hospitals Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007 23 116 125 10.1017/S0266462307051653 17234025 · DOI
  10. Oakley AM Kerr P Duffill M Rademaker M Fleischl P Bradford N Mills C Patient cost-benefits of realtime teledermatology--a comparison of data from Northern Ireland and New Zealand J Telemed Telecare 2000 6 97 101 10.1258/1357633001935112 10824377 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wade, V. A., Karnon, J., Elshaug, A. G., & Hiller, J. E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • South Australia Pathology (AU)
Corresponding author
Wade, Victoria A
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2010-08-10
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
233-233
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990461339
Cited by
351
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
telemedicine, real-time video communication, synchronous telehealth, cost-effectiveness, health care costs, health outcomes, rural health care, home care, patient travel costs
MeSH terms
Costs and Cost Analysis, Humans, Rural Population, Video Recording, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review