Cited by 73Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid Use

Validity, Reliability, Feasibility, and Usefulness of Pain Monitor: A Multidimensional Smartphone App for Daily Monitoring of Adults With Heterogenous Chronic Pain

Open access
Suso-Ribera, Carlos, Castilla, Diana, Zaragozá, Irene, Ribera-Canudas, María Victoria, Botella, Cristina, García-Palacios, Azucena·2018·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ecological momentary assessment has been recommended in the management of chronic pain. Smartphone apps might be a useful tool for that purpose. This goal of this study was to develop and test a multidimensional smartphone app for adults with chronic pain. A multidisciplinary team developed the app content after a series of meetings, considering clinical guidelines for pain measurement. The content included pain intensity and interference, fatigue, mood, perceived health status, activity level, side effects of the medication, use of rescue medication, and pain-related sychological constructs (catastrophizing, acceptance, fear, and coping). METHODS: Thirty-eight participants (21 to 59 y) used the app, called Pain Monitor, twice a day during 30 consecutive days. Patients completed a set of well-established measures at the beginning and end of the study via paper-and-pencil. Weekly phone assessments were also made for pain intensity, pain interference, fatigue, and mood. RESULTS: Construct validity was revealed by moderate-to-strong correlations between app content and traditional measures. Feasibility was supported by high compliance (between 70% and 82%) and high acceptability and ease of use. Both side effects of the medication and use of rescue medication were found to be useful tools to guide treatment. DISCUSSION: The new assessment protocol in the app allows for an easy and rapid multidimensional assessment of chronic pain patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000618

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suso-Ribera, C., Castilla, D., Zaragozá, I., Ribera-Canudas, M. V., Botella, C., & García-Palacios, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Jaume I University, Castellon
  • Universitat Jaume I (ES)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • Pain Clinic, Valld’Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
Corresponding author
  • Castilla, Diana
  • Botella, Cristina
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2018-10
Volume
34
Issue
10
Pages
900-908
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802702029
Cited by
73
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
14.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
chronic pain, mobile application, ecological momentary assessment, pain intensity, pain interference, fatigue, mood, adverse drug reactions, rescue medication, pain catastrophizing, acceptance, fear, coping, construct validity, feasibility, medication adherence, acceptability, multidimensional pain assessment
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adult, Affect, Analgesics, Fatigue, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Reproducibility of Results, Telemedicine, Young Adult, Chronic Pain, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review