Cited by 160Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Benefits of mobile apps in pain management: Systematic review

Open access
Thurnheer, Simon E, Gravestock, Isaac, Pichierri, Giuseppe, Steurer, Johann, Burgstaller, Jakob M·2018·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain is a common condition with a significant physical, psychosocial, and economic impact. Due to enormous progress in mobile device technology as well as the increase in smartphone ownership in the general population, mobile apps can be used to monitor patients with pain and support them in pain management. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of smartphone or computer tablet apps in the management of patients with pain. METHODS: In December 2017, a literature search was performed in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PsycINFO. In addition, a bibliography search was conducted. We included studies with at least 20 participants per arm that evaluated the effects of apps on smartphones or computer tablets on improvement in pain. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies with 1962 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 4 studies examined the effect of mobile apps on pain management in an in-clinic setting and 11 in an out-clinic setting. The majority of the original studies reported beneficial effects of the use of a pain app. Severity of pain decreased in most studies where patients were using an app compared with patients not using an app. Other outcomes, such as worst pain or quality of life showed improvements in patients using an app. Due to heterogeneity between the original studies-patient characteristics, app content, and study setting-a synthesis of the results by statistical methods was not performed. CONCLUSIONS: Apps for pain management may be beneficial for patients, particularly in an out-clinic setting. Studies have shown that pain apps are workable and well liked by patients and health care professionals. There is no doubt that in the near future, mobile technologies will develop further. Medicine could profit from this development as indicated by our results, but there is a need for more scientific inputs. It is desirable to know which elements of apps or additional devices and tools may improve usability and help patients in pain management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/11231

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital solutions may have the potential to improve outreach and provide easy and relatively low-cost access to pain self-management interventions.

    “Digital solutions may have the potential to improve outreach and provide easy and relatively low-cost access to pain self-management interventions [17,18].”

    From Short-Term Findings From Testing EPIO, a Digital Self-Management Program for People Living With Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Discussion’s Implications section says pain-management apps can combine diaries, education, reminders, treatment recommendations, and communication with health care personnel. The Comparison With Existing Literature section also describes remote pain-coping training and access to symptom information from home. These passages support the potential for digital pain-management access, but the paper does not establish improved outreach or relatively low cost. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Rigorous efficacy testing to establish efficacy appears scarce in existing digital pain self-management interventions.

    “Finally, rigorous efficacy testing to establish efficacy appears to be scarce in the existing digital pain self-management interventions [17,27]”

    From Short-Term Findings From Testing EPIO, a Digital Self-Management Program for People Living With Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Discussion > Implications section says more high-quality studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of pain-management apps. Results > Methodological Quality reports only one high-quality RCT among the included studies. This supports the claim for mobile apps, but the cited review does not establish that rigorous testing is scarce across digital pain self-management interventions generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Existing digital pain self-management interventions have shown promising results in meeting unfulfilled needs, supporting psychological well-being, and improving health-related quality of life.

    “Existing digital pain self-management interventions have, for example, shown promising results in meeting unfulfilled needs, supporting psychological well-being, and improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [17-20].”

    From Short-Term Findings From Testing EPIO, a Digital Self-Management Program for People Living With Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results section (‘Effects of Apps on Other Outcomes and Information About Feasibility’; page not provided) reports improvements in well-being, anxiety or positive affect in some studies, and says all studies evaluating quality of life found improvement among app users. The paper describes ways apps can support pain management, but does not establish that these interventions met previously unfulfilled needs. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Capacity for self-regulation is a limited source that can be fatigued, and the complexity of chronic pain likely negatively affects ability to self-regulate.

    “Studies have shown capacity for self-regulation to be a limited source that can be fatigued,4,5,55 and the complexity of chronic pain likely negatively affects ability to self-regulate.46,48,58,69”

    From Living well with chronic pain: a 12-month randomized controlled trial revealing impact from the digital pain self-management program EPIO (2024) · cites this paper as [55]

    The citation is attached to the claim that chronic pain likely impairs self-regulation, not to the preceding claim about self-regulatory fatigue. The Introduction discusses apps that support pain management, and the Discussion describes pain-coping interventions, but neither addresses whether the complexity of chronic pain reduces self-regulatory ability. Searches for self-regulation, fatigue, and that proposed effect found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Existing eHealth and mHealth solutions in pain settings have focused mostly on self-administered treatments, mostly psychological or physical therapy.

    “To date, the focus of existing eHealth and mHealth solutions in pain settings has been mostly placed on self-administered treatments, mostly of psychological or alternatively of physical therapy nature [64,65,66].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [37]NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence - Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management 2016 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59 27929617

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thurnheer, S. E., Gravestock, I., Pichierri, G., Steurer, J., & Burgstaller, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Thurnheer, Simon E
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2018-10-22
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
e11231
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897973573
Cited by
160
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Universität Zürich
  • Helmut Horten Stiftung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
mobile health apps, pain management, mobile application, tablet application, pain intensity, quality of life, app usability, patient acceptance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review