Cited by 64Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePsychiatric care and mental health services

Economic evaluation and costs of telepsychiatry programmes: A systematic review

Open access
Naslund, John A, Mitchell, Lauren M, Joshi, Udita, Nagda, Dipal, Lu, Chunling·2022·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Objective: Telepsychiatry involves use of telecommunications technology to deliver psychiatric care and offers promise to reduce costs and increase access to mental health services. This systematic review examined cost reporting of telepsychiatry programmes for mental healthcare. Methods: We systematically searched electronic databases for studies reporting costs, including economic evaluations such as cost-effectiveness analyses, or costs of developing telepsychiatry programmes for clinical care of mental disorders. Included studies enrolled participants with mental disorders and involved telepsychiatry for depression, anxiety disorders, serious mental illnesses including schizophrenia spectrum disorders and bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, dementia or epilepsy. Results: Twenty-six unique studies met inclusion criteria (17,967 participants), with most targeting depression ( n = 7; 27%), general mental disorders and screening ( n = 7; 27%), child mental health ( n = 4; 15%) and geriatric mental health ( n = 4; 15%). Nearly all studies ( n = 25; 96%) compared telepsychiatry programme costs with either standard in-person consultation or usual care, with 15 (60%) reporting that telepsychiatry programmes were less expensive, and 8 (32%) showing telepsychiatry programmes were more expensive. Three studies reported cost-effectiveness analyses, favouring telepsychiatry programmes, but at highly elevated cost-effectiveness thresholds. Few studies reported costs of developing or delivering telepsychiatry programmes. Conclusion: Costs of telepsychiatry programmes varied widely, with substantial heterogeneity in how costs were defined and reported. Some programmes cost less than in-person services while others cost more. Therefore, rigorous cost-effectiveness studies following established standards in economic evaluation are needed to inform implementation and sustainability of these programmes in health systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1357633x20938919

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]Gajaria A, Conn DK and Madan R. Telepsychiatry: effectiveness and feasibility. Smart Homecare Technol TeleHealth 2015; 3: 59– 67.
  2. [30]Higgins JP and Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.0: Wiley Online Library, https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.0.0/ (2008, accessed 15 November 2019).
  3. [57]Vo AH. The telehealth promise: better health care and cost savings for the 21st century, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b010/560935386815dc02bd348b7c117aba422c74.pdf (2008, accessed 22 January 2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naslund, J. A., Mitchell, L. M., Joshi, U., Nagda, D., & Lu, C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Sangath (IN)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Naslund, John A
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2020-08-03
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
311-330
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W3047550879
Cited by
64
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (5U19MH113211)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
telepsychiatry, cost-effectiveness, mental health care costs, depression, anxiety disorders, severe mental illness, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, dementia, epilepsy, access to mental health care
MeSH terms
Aged, Mental Disorders, Child, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Mental Health Services, Psychiatry, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review