Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 632

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Web Personalization as a Persuasion Strategy: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective

Tam, Kar Yan, Ho, Shuk Ying·2005·Information Systems Research

Abstract

With advances in tracking and database technologies, firms are increasingly able to understand their customers and translate this understanding into products and services that appeal to them. Technologies such as collaborative filtering, data mining, and click-stream analysis enable firms to customize their offerings at the individual level. While there has been a lot of hype about web personalization recently, our understanding of its effectiveness is far from conclusive. Drawing on the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) literature, this research takes the view that the interaction between a firm and its customers is one of communicating a persuasive message to the customers driven by business objectives. In particular, we examine three major elements of a web personalization strategy: level of preference matching, recommendation set size, and sorting cue. These elements can be manipulated by a firm in implementing its personalization strategy. This research also investigates a personal disposition, need for cognition, which plays a role in assessing the effectiveness of web personalization. Research hypotheses are tested using 1,000 subjects in three field experiments based on a ring-tone download website. Our findings indicate the saliency of these variables in different stages of the persuasion process. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.1050.0058

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Allen C., 1998, Internet World Guide to One-To-One Web Marketing
  2. 10.1145/506218.506245 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/1520-6793(200010)17:10<855::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
  4. 10.1086/341577 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805 · Paper page
  6. Cohan P. S., 2000, E-Profit: High-Payoff Strategies for Capturing the E-Commerce Edge
  7. 10.1037/h0042761 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  9. 10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dillard J. P., 2002, The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, 10.4135/9781412976046 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Eagly A. H., 1993, The Psychology of Attitudes
  12. 10.1002/asi.10115 · doi:10.1002/asi.10115
  13. 10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.251 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.875 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1086/208994 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80038-1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1287/isre.1040.0017 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1080/10864415.2001.11044215 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.26 · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.26
  20. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.5 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.5 · Paper page
  21. Lachman R., 1979, Cognitive Psychology and Information Processing
  22. 10.1002/mar.10112 · doi:10.1002/mar.10112
  23. Ledford J. A. L., 2002, Content Personalization Market Trends
  24. 10.1145/506218.506246 · doi:10.1145/506218.506246
  25. 10.2307/1251376 · doi:10.2307/1251376 · Paper page
  26. 10.1086/208926 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1086/209270 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1344.17313 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.3109/00207458508985369 · doi:10.3109/00207458508985369
  30. 10.1177/002224297503900401 · DOI
  31. Peppers D., 1997, Enterprise One to One: Tools for Competing in the Interactive Age
  32. Petty R. E., 1981, Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches
  33. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1086/322901 · DOI
  35. 10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1080/10864415.2001.11044216 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1518/0018720024497916 · DOI
  38. Simon H. A., 1979, Models of Thought
  39. 10.4324/9780203359341 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.146 · DOI
  41. 10.1006/jrpe.1993.1017 · DOI
  42. Wyer R. S., 1989, Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context
  43. Zhang P. A., 2000, J. AIS, 1, 1

Metadata

Authors
Tam, K. Y., & Ho, S. Y.
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2005-09
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
271-291
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2111865761
Cited by
632
References
3
FWCI
27.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.