The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems
Abstract
Technical developments in electronic communication, computing, and decision support, coupled with new interest on the part of organizations to improve meeting effectiveness, are spurring research in the area of group decision support systems (GDSS). A GDSS combines communication, computing, and decision support technologies to facilitate formulation and solution of unstructured problems by a group of people. This paper presents a conceptual overview of GDSS based on an information-exchange perspective of decision making, Three levels of systems are described, representing varying degrees of intervention into the decision process. Research on GDSS is conceived as evolving over time from the study of simple “shell” systems, consisting of menus of features available for selection by a group, to consideration of sophisticated rule-based systems that enable a group to pursue highly structured and novel decision paths. A multi-dimensional taxonomy of systems is proposed as an organizing framework for research in the area. Three environmental contingencies are identified as critical to GDSS design: group size, member proximity, and the task confronting the group. Potential impacts of GDSS on group processes and outcomes are discussed, and important constructs in need of study are identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
Cited by
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121 · Cited by 3,879
Self-citationThe interdisciplinary study of coordination
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/174666.174668 · Cited by 3,504
Computer-supported cooperative work: history and focus
Grudin, J. (1994) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.291294 · Cited by 1,639
Ma, M., & Agarwal, R. (2007) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0113 · Cited by 1,143
Bentley University, U., Markus, M. L., Silver, M., & Fordham University (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00176 · Cited by 927
Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups
Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1990) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.6.689 · Cited by 849
Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration
Seeber, I., Bittner, E., Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, T., de Vreede, G.-J., Elkins, A., Maier, R., Merz, A. B., Oeste-Reiß, S., Randrup, N., et al. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.103174 · Cited by 835
Problem structuring methods in action
Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00056-0 · Cited by 749
Virtual Teams versus Face‐to‐Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web‐based Conference System*
Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01338.x · Cited by 663
Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research
Brown, S. A., Dennis, A. R., & Venkatesh, V. (2010) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222270201 · Cited by 592
A Critical Analysis of Decision Support Systems Research
Arnott, D., & Pervan, G. (2005) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000035 · Cited by 571
Decision Support Systems: A Historical Overview
Power, D. J. (2008) · International Handbooks on Information Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_7 · Cited by 202
An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research
Fjermestad, J. (2004) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(03)00021-6 · Cited by 193
Digital social norm enforcement: Online firestorms in social media
Rost, K., Stahel, L., & Frey, B. S. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155923 · Cited by 190
Units of Analysis for Internet Communication
December, J. (1996) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01459.x · Cited by 163
From The Matrix to a Model of Coordinated Action (MoCA): A Conceptual Framework of and for CSCW
Lee, C. P., & Paine, D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675161 · Cited by 139
Computer-mediated focus groups
Walston, J. T., & Lissitz, R. W. (2000) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x0002400502 · Cited by 75
Rains, S. A. (2005) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650204273763 · Cited by 74
Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware
Grudin, J., & Poltrock, S. E. (1997) · Advances in Computers · doi:10.1016/s0065-2458(08)60710-x · Cited by 70
Yu, F.-Y., & Wu, C.-P. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.012 · Cited by 50
McNamara, K., Dennis, A. R., & Carte, T. A. (2008) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530701777123 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1987-05
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 589-609
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2038281539
- Cited by
- 2,013
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 90.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.