The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market
Abstract
It is known that end users of products and services sometimes innovate, and that innovations developed by users sometimes become the basis for important newcommercial products and services. It has also been argued and to some extent shown that such innovations will be found concentrated in a “lead user” segment of the user community. However, neither the characteristics of innovating users nor the scope of the community that they “lead” has been explored in depth. In this paper, we explore the characteristics of innovation, innovators, and innovation sharing by library users of OPAC information search systems in Australia. This market has capable users, but it is nonetheless clearly a “follower” with respect to worldwide technological advance. Wefind that 26% of users in this local market nonetheless do modify their OPACs in both major and minor ways, and that OPAC manufacturers judge many of these user modifications to be of commercial interest. We find that we can distinguish modifying from nonmodifying users on the basis of a number of factors, including their “leading-edge status” and their in-house technical capabilities. We find that many innovating users freely share their innovations with others, and find that we can distinguish users that share information about their modifications from users that do not. We conclude by considering some implications of our findings for idea generation practices in marketing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement
Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1978) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208701 · Cited by 1,550
Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products
Urban, G. L., & von Hippel, E. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.569 · Cited by 1,125
Cited by
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145
Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2003) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.443040 · Cited by 1,531
Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2005) · Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5326.003.0005 · Cited by 1,530
Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00061-1 · Cited by 772
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20077 · Cited by 686
Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation
von Hippel, E. (2009) · International Journal of Innovation Science · doi:10.1260/175722209787951224 · Cited by 459
Self-citationCustomer co-creation in service innovation: a matter of communication?
Gustafsson, A., Kristensson, P., & Witell, L. (2012) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/09564231211248426 · Cited by 354
Welfare Implications of User Innovation
Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2005) · Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield · doi:10.1007/0-387-25022-0_5 · Cited by 174
Self-citationYe, H. (., & Kankanhalli, A. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/12361 · Cited by 138
Huang, P., Tafti, A., & Mithas, S. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/13490 · Cited by 133
The major role of clinicians in the discovery of off-label drug therapies
DeMonaco, H. J., Ali, A., & von Hippel, E. (2006) · Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1592/phco.26.3.323 · Cited by 142
Self-citationHorizontal Innovation Networks - by and for Users
von Hippel, E. (2002) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.328900 · Cited by 70
Self-citationPreißner, S., Raasch, C., & Schweisfurth, T. (2024) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12709 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., & von Hippel, E.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1513-1527
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2124946950
- Cited by
- 614
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.