The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor
Abstract
Organizations are increasingly relying on team-based structures as work becomes more complex, nonroutine, and knowledge intensive. Teams comprised of individuals with diverse skills and expertise may be well suited to perform such work. However, as teams become more prevalent, organizations may struggle with ways to exercise control. Formal controls, with their focus on prespecified rules, performance targets, and hierarchical relationships, may be less effective in a teamwork environment than clan control, in which work-related behavior is motivated by shared norms and values, as well as a common vision, and individuals attempt to be accepted or “regular” members of a team. However, little is known about the antecedents of clan control. Much of the existing empirical research on the antecedents of control has been influenced by Ouchi's (Ouchi, W. G. 1977. The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22 95–113) framework, which posits clan control is used when managers lack knowledge of means–ends relationships and are unable to measure outcomes. This paper adopts the view that clan control is a “people” or social process and argues that social capital, a construct that reflects connections and relationships among individuals, is a missing, key antecedent of clan control. In particular, we posit that the existence of social capital enables team members, as well as project managers, to facilitate clan control within a team, i.e., team-based clan control. A model is developed and hypotheses are tested using survey data collected from 95 information systems project teams. The results suggest that social capital assets are associated with team-based clan control. Recognizing that the project manager typically has a different level of organizational authority than team members, additional hypotheses are developed relating characteristics of the project manager to team-based clan control. The results of these tests suggest that team-based clan control is also dependent on the manager's knowledge of business processes and the application area, coupled with the extent to which he observes the behaviors of the project team. Thus, our results suggest that there are conditions under which team-based clan control is facilitated by the project team as a whole (including team members and project managers), as well as conditions under which team-based clan control is facilitated by project managers in their role as team leaders. Implications and suggestions for future work are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134367 · Cited by 9,665
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809
THE DYNAMIC NATURE OF CONFLICT: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF INTRAGROUP CONFLICT AND GROUP PERFORMANCE.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069453 · Cited by 2,487
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306 · Cited by 2,221
Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams
Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872 · Cited by 974
Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., & John, R. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0044 · Cited by 350
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.2307/3152068 · DOI
- 10.1080/07421222.2001.11045666 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1252187 · DOI
- 10.2307/3069401 · DOI · Paper page
- Bliese P. D., 2000, Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, 349
- 10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.1040.0084 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3069393 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/isre.14.3.291.16563 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1059601197221004 · DOI
- 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1556384 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.31.2.134 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TEM.2006.872245 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0526 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00774.x · DOI
- 10.2307/256325 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/258578 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.38.6.757 · DOI · Paper page
- Jaccard J., 1990, Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression
- 10.2307/1251447 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1252057 · DOI
- 10.2307/25148670 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.339 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.7.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/isre.8.3.215 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/isre.1040.0036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.48.4.484.204 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1251779 · DOI
- 10.1145/203330.203345 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.1060.0191 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1986.tb00953.x · DOI
- Mähring M. IT project governance. (2002) . Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm
- 10.2307/25148704 · DOI
- McFarlan W. F., 1981, Harvard Bus. Rev., 59, 142
- 10.2307/25148759 · DOI
- Mohrman S. A., 1995, Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work
- 10.2307/249562 · DOI · Paper page
- Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory
- 10.1177/0021886300361002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2391748 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2392231 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/420517 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/isre.1080.0177 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/MS.2002.1003450 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/isre.1080.0169 · DOI
- Schmidt E., 2005, Newsweek
- 10.1287/isre.1060.0098 · DOI
- 10.2307/256375 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/25148732 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSE.2002.1019481 · DOI
- 10.2308/accr.2003.78.4.1069 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/257085 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.2006.19379631 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/25148667 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3556678 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations
McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011) · Journal of Trust Research · doi:10.1080/21515581.2011.552424 · Cited by 477
Huang, P.-Y., Pan, S. L., & Ouyang, T. H. (2014) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.4 · Cited by 95
Globocnik, D., Faullant, R., & Parastuty, Z. (2020) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2019.08.005 · Cited by 79
Ramasubbu, N., & Kemerer, C. F. (2021) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1870377 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirsch, L. J., Ko, D.-G., & Haney, M. H.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 469-489
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2165682523
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 10.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.