Cited by 43School Choice and PerformanceEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Self‐affirmation reduces the socioeconomic attainment gap in schools in England

Open access
Hadden, Ian Robert, Easterbrook, Matthew John, Nieuwenhuis, Marlon, Fox, Kerry Jane, Dolan, Paul·2020·British Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Background: Studies in the United States show that school students from some ethnic backgrounds are susceptible to stereotype threat, that this undermines their academic performance, and that a series of virtually zero‐cost self‐affirmation writing exercises can reduce these adverse effects. In England, however, socioeconomic status ( SES ) is a much stronger predictor of academic success than is ethnic background. Aims: This study investigates whether self‐affirmation writing exercises can help close the SES attainment gap in England by increasing the academic performance of low‐ SES (but not higher‐ SES ) school students. Sample: Our sample consisted of students aged 11–14 in a secondary school in southern England ( N = 562); of these, 128 were eligible for free school meals, a proxy for low SES . Methods: Students completed three short writing exercises throughout one academic year: those randomly assigned to an affirmed condition wrote about values that were important to them, and those assigned to a control condition wrote about a neutral topic. Results: On average, the low‐ SES students had lower academic performance and reported experiencing more stereotype threat than their higher‐ SES peers. The self‐affirmation raised the academic performance of the low‐ SES students by 0.38 standard deviations but did not significantly affect the performance of the higher‐ SES students, thus reducing the SES performance gap by 62%. The self‐affirmation also reduced the level of stress reported by the low‐ SES students. Conclusions: The benefits of this virtually zero‐cost intervention compare favourably with those of other interventions targeting the SES academic attainment gap.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjep.12291

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lyubomirsky, S., & Della Porta, M. D. (2012). Boosting Happiness, Buttressing Resilience: Results from Cognitive and Behavioral Interventions. In J. W. Reich, A. J. Zautra, & J. S. Hall (Eds.), Handbook of Adult Resilience (pp. 450-464). Guilford Publications.
  2. National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Back to school statistics (Vol. 766).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hadden, I. R., Easterbrook, M. J., Nieuwenhuis, M., Fox, K. J., & Dolan, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University of Brighton (GB)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Hadden, Ian Robert
Venue
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-04
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
517-536
ISSN
  • 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8279
OpenAlex
W2948533344
Cited by
43
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
13.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-affirmation, academic performance, stereotype threat, low socioeconomic status students, free school meals, writing exercises, student stress, educational inequality, high school students
MeSH terms
Academic Performance, Psychosocial Intervention, Adolescent, Child, England, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Schools, Self Concept, Social Class, Stereotyping, Students, Writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review