The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to do a meta‐analysis
Abstract
Meta‐analysis is a statistical tool for estimating the mean and variance of underlying population effects from a collection of empirical studies addressing ostensibly the same research question. Meta‐analysis has become an increasing popular and valuable tool in psychological research, and major review articles typically employ these methods. This article describes the process of conducting meta‐analysis: selecting articles, developing inclusion criteria, calculating effect sizes, conducting the actual analysis (including information on how to do the analysis on popular computer packages such as IBM SPSS and R) and estimating the effects of publication bias. Guidance is also given on how to write up a meta‐analysis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In terms of data extraction, all studies provided raw M ± SD scores apart from two55,56 where estimated marginal M ± SDs were given (raw data was requested from corresponding authors but could not be obtained).”
From Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, Rosenthal’s fail-safe N was calculated (to estimate how many further studies yielding zero effect would be required to make the overall ES non-significant for stress)56.”
From Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
In the citing paper
“A random-effects model was selected as it was recommended that variability in effect sizes should be assumed in psychological research and that this model allowed generalisation of the findings beyond the studies included in the meta-analysis (Field and Gillett 2010).”
From A meta-analytic review of the efficacy of physical exercise interventions on cognition in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and ADHD (2016) · cites this paper as Field and Gillett 2010
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A. P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28,269
Self-citationOperating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance
Friedman, M. (1937) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522 · Cited by 7,005
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,839
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Clark‐Carter D., 2003, Effect size: The missing piece in the jigsaw, Psychologist, 16, 636
- Cochrane Collaboration, 2008, Review Manager (RevMan) for Windows: Version 5.0
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
- DeCoster J., 1998, Microsoft Excel spreadsheets: Meta‐analysis
- Field A. P., 2005, A handbook of research methods in clinical and health psychology, 295
- Field A. P., 2009, How to do a meta‐analysis
- Fisher R. A., 1935, The design of experiments
- 10.2307/1164832 · DOI · Paper page
- Lavesque R., 2001, Syntax: Meta‐analysis
- 10.3102/10769986008002157 · DOI · Paper page
- Schwarzer G., 2005, Meta
- Wilson D. B., 2004, A spreadsheet for calculating standardized mean difference type effect sizes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,000
A meta-analysis of the survival-processing advantage in memory
Scofield, J. E., Buchanan, E. M., & Kostic, B. N. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1346-0 · Cited by 67
The Effectiveness of Male-Targeted Sexual Assault Prevention Programs: A Meta-Analysis
Wright, L., Zounlomè, N. O. O., & Whiston, S. C. (2018) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838018801330 · Cited by 63
Ewing, D. L., Monsen, J. J., Thompson, E. J., Cartwright‐Hatton, S., & Field, A. P. (2013) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465813001094 · Cited by 67
Self-citationLimbu, Y. B., Gautam, R. K., & Zhou, W. (2022) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines10122026 · Cited by 68
Martini, A., Lago, D. D., Edelstyn, N. M. J., Grange, J. A., & Tamburin, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00654 · Cited by 64
Hedge, C., Powell, G., Bompas, A., Vivian-Griffiths, S., & Sumner, P. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000164 · Cited by 67
Kyker‐Snowman, E., Lombardozzi, D., Bonan, G. B., Cheng, S. J., Dukes, J. S., Frey, S. D., Jacobs, E. M., McNellis, R., Rady, J. M., Smith, N. G., et al. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15894 · Cited by 60
Kannankai, M. P., Babu, A. J., Amal, R., Alex, R. K., Borah, A., & Devipriya, S. P. (2022) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129801 · Cited by 64
A contextual model of driving anger: A meta-analysis
Demir, B., Demir, S., & Özkan, T. (2016) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.020 · Cited by 55
Lange, F., Brückner, C., Knebel, A., Seer, C., & Kopp, B. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.06.014 · Cited by 60
Zhou, M., & Lam, K. K. L. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09646-7 · Cited by 63
Tao, S., Li, J., Zhang, M., Zheng, P., Lau, E. Y. H., Sun, J., & Zhu, Y. (2021) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01570-9 · Cited by 71
Batdı, V., Doğan, Y., & Talan, T. (2021) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1954035 · Cited by 70
Microbe-Mediated Thermotolerance in Plants and Pertinent Mechanisms- A Meta-Analysis and Review
Dastogeer, K. M. G., Zahan, M. I., Rhaman, M. S., Sarker, M. S. A., & Chakraborty, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.833566 · Cited by 60
Ribosa, J., & Durán, D. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100475 · Cited by 80
The Inherence Heuristic as a Source of Essentialist Thought
Salomon, E., & Cimpian, A. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214541659 · Cited by 61
Mani, R., Asper, L. J., & Khuu, S. K. (2018) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2018.1483030 · Cited by 63
Word retrieval in connected speech in Alzheimer’s disease: A review with meta-analyses
Kavé, G., & Goral, M. (2018) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2017.1338663 · Cited by 56
The relationship between school and classroom climate, and academic achievement: A meta-analysis
Erdem, C., & Kaya, M. (2023) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/01430343231202923 · Cited by 94
Orgambídez-Ramos, A., Alés, Y. B., Alcalde, F. J., & Durán, A. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13040393 · Cited by 79
The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: Emerging reliability and validity data
Moghaddam, N. G., Hart, A. J. P., & Dawson, D. L. (2013) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.05.002 · Cited by 57
Optical treatment of amblyopia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Asper, L. J., Watt, K., & Khuu, S. K. (2018) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1111/cxo.12657 · Cited by 57
Autonomic nervous system activity during positive emotions: a meta-analytic review
Behnke, M., Kreibig, S. D., Kaczmarek, L. D., Assink, M., & Gross, J. J. (2022) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/17540739211073084 · Cited by 60
Meta-analysis of biomarkers for severe dengue infections
Soo, K.-M., Khalid, B., Ching, S. M., Tham, C. L., Basir, R., & Chee, H. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.3589 · Cited by 56
van der Meulen, E., van der Velden, P. G., van Aert, R. C. M., & van Veldhoven, M. J. P. M. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112814 · Cited by 63
Effectiveness of cognitive stimulation for dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cafferata, R. M. T., Hicks, B., & von Bastian, C. C. (2021) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000325 · Cited by 64
A systematic review of climate change science relevant to Australian design flood estimation
Wasko, C., Westra, S., Nathan, R. J., Pepler, A. S., Raupach, T., Dowdy, A. J., Johnson, F. M., Ho, M., McInnes, K. L., Jakob, D., et al. (2024) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-28-1251-2024 · Cited by 56
Tod, D., & Edwards, C. (2015) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2015.1052089 · Cited by 56
Moukhtarian, T. R., Cooper, R. E., Vassos, E., Moran, P., & Asherson, P. (2017) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.05.021 · Cited by 56
Self-reported sex differences in high-functioning adults with autism: a meta-analysis
Moseley, R. L., Hitchiner, R., & Kirkby, J. A. (2018) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/s13229-018-0216-6 · Cited by 66
Golden, H. L., Vosper, J., Kingston, J., & Ellett, L. (2021) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01501-8 · Cited by 55
The instructor presence effect and its moderators in instructional video: A series of meta-analyses
Beege, M., Schroeder, N. L., Heidig, S., Rey, G. D., & Schneider, S. (2023) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100564 · Cited by 69
How to Detect Publication Bias in Psychological Research
Renkewitz, F., & Keiner, M. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000386 · Cited by 62
Gao, S., Yu, D., Assink, M., Chan, K. L., Zhang, L., & Meng, X. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380221147559 · Cited by 54
Ku, B., Stinson, J. D., & MacDonald, M. (2019) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-019-01412-w · Cited by 54
Chen, C., Lindell, M. K., & Wang, H. (2021) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102244 · Cited by 54
Meta‐analysis and review of learner performance and preference: virtual versus optical microscopy
Wilson, A. B., Taylor, M., Klein, B. A., Sugrue, M. K., Whipple, E. C., & Brokaw, J. J. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12944 · Cited by 53
Spatial ability at two scales of representation: A meta-analysis
Wang, L., Cohen, A. S., & Carr, M. (2014) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.006 · Cited by 55
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Self-Help Interventions in Tinnitus
Nyenhuis, N., Golm, D., & Kröner‐Herwig, B. (2013) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2013.803496 · Cited by 52
Marraccini, M. E., Weyandt, L. L., Rossi, J. S., & Guðmundsdóttir, B. G. (2016) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000079 · Cited by 53
McPhee, G. M., Downey, L. A., & Stough, C. K. K. (2020) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107298 · Cited by 59
Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review
Mahmić-Kaknjo, M., Utrobičić, A., & Marušić, A. (2020) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1822170 · Cited by 52
Physiotherapy Intervention in Alzheimer's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Zhu, X., Yu, Y., Wang, H.-F., Jiang, T., Cao, L., Wang, C., Wang, J., Tan, C., Meng, X., Tan, L., et al. (2015) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-141377 · Cited by 51
Rozado, D. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231189 · Cited by 61
Trivasse, H., Webb, T. L., & Waller, G. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101887 · Cited by 51
Shi, H., Hellwich, O., Luo, G., Chen, C., He, H., Ochege, F. U., de Voorde, T. V., Kurban, A., & Maeyer, P. D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2021.3109819 · Cited by 50
Samaha, J., & Romei, V. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02069 · Cited by 50
Three Decades of Research on Induced Hypocrisy: A Meta-Analysis
Priolo, D., Pelt, A., Saint-Bauzel, R., Rubens, L., Voisin, D., & Fointiat, V. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219841621 · Cited by 63
Predictors of recidivism following release from custody: a meta-analysis
Goodley, G., Pearson, D. A. S., & Morris, P. (2021) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2021.1962866 · Cited by 49
Manipulating Belief in Free Will and Its Downstream Consequences: A Meta-Analysis
Genschow, O., Cracco, E., Schneider, J., Protzko, J., Wisniewski, D., Braß, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683221087527 · Cited by 63
Shen, X., Xu, Q., & Liu, Q. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275312 · Cited by 52
Amlashi, R. S., Majzoobi, M. R., & Forstmeier, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403807 · Cited by 58
Grundy, J. G., & Anderson, J. A. E. (2017) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00344 · Cited by 48
Conducting Behavioural Research in the Zoo: A Guide to Ten Important Methods, Concepts and Theories
Rose, P. E., & Riley, L. M. (2021) · Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens · doi:10.3390/jzbg2030031 · Cited by 47
de Brito, M. A., Fernandes, J. R., Esteves, N. S., Müller, V. T., Alexandria, D. D. B., Pérez, D. I. V., Slimani, M., Brito, C. J., Bragazzi, N. L., & Miarka, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.868450 · Cited by 46
Designing the ultrasonic treatment of nanoparticle-dispersions via machine learning
Glaubitz, C., Rothen‐Rutishauser, B., Lattuada, M., Balog, S., & Petri‐Fink, A. (2022) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/d2nr03240f · Cited by 46
Hedayati, S., Damghanian, H., Farhadinejad, M., & Rastgar, A. A. (2023) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103758 · Cited by 46
Hooshyar, D., Weng, X., Sillat, P. J., Tammets, K., Wang, M., & Hämäläinen, R. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105169 · Cited by 63
Personality versus traffic accidents; meta-analysis of real and method effects
Wåhlberg, A., Barraclough, P., & Freeman, J. (2017) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.009 · Cited by 46
Gurnani, A. S., & Gavett, B. E. (2016) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-016-9334-0 · Cited by 46
Age at migration and the risk of psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Anderson, K., & Edwards, J. (2020) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.13147 · Cited by 31
Fischer, S., Hyder, S., & Walker, A. (2020) · Australian Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0312896219899450 · Cited by 62
Baruch, E., Pistrang, N., & Barker, C. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.077 · Cited by 45
Influence of artificial intelligence tools on higher order thinking skills: a meta-analysis
Ilgun Dibek, M., Sahin Kursad, M., & Erdogan, T. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2402028 · Cited by 45
Xia, Q., Li, W., Yang, Y., Weng, X., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100455 · Cited by 45
Barraclough, P., af Wåhlberg, A. E., Freeman, J., Watson, B. C., & Watson, A. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153390 · Cited by 45
Vally, Z., & Abrahams, L. (2016) · International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling · doi:10.1007/s10447-016-9275-6 · Cited by 47
Sayour, A. A., Celeng, C., Oláh, A., Ruppert, M., Merkely, B. P., & Radovits, T. (2021) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-020-05359-2 · Cited by 45
Chatburn, A., Lushington, K., & Kohler, M. J. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.018 · Cited by 42
Thompson, A., Winsper, C., Marwaha, S., Haynes, J., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Hetrick, S., Realpe, A., Vail, L., Dawson, S., & Sullivan, S. A. (2018) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2018.17 · Cited by 44
Herbert, M. S., Dochat, C., Wooldridge, J. S., Materna, K., Blanco, B. H., Tynan, M., Lee, M. W., Gasperi, M., Camodeca, A., Harris, D., et al. (2022) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2021.103995 · Cited by 44
Prospective Memory in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-analysis
Ramanan, S., & Kumar, D. (2013) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617713001045 · Cited by 44
Intracanal irrigants for pulpectomy in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Pozos‐Guillén, A., Garcia‐Flores, A., Esparza‐Villalpando, V., & Garrocho‐Rangel, A. (2016) · International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry · doi:10.1111/ipd.12228 · Cited by 45
A Meta-Analytic Literature Review on Organization-Level Drivers of Team Learning
Nellen, L. C., Gijselaers, W., & Grohnert, T. (2019) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484319894756 · Cited by 50
Assessing Publication Bias: a 7-Step User’s Guide with Best-Practice Recommendations
Kepes, S., Wang, W., & Cortina, J. M. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-022-09840-0 · Cited by 47
Ganesha, H. R., & Aithal, P. S. (2022) · International Journal of Management Technology and Social Sciences · doi:10.47992/ijmts.2581.6012.0233 · Cited by 66
A meta-analysis of the impact of technology related factors on students’ academic performance
Kuş, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1524645 · Cited by 88
Harris, A. D., Puts, N. A. J., Anderson, B. A., Yantis, S., Pekar, J. J., Barker, P. B., & Edden, R. A. E. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117531 · Cited by 43
Duncan, T. S., Karkada, M., Deacon, S. H., & Smith, I. M. (2021) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2483 · Cited by 48
Maric, M., Bexkens, A., & Bögels, S. M. (2018) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-018-0255-8 · Cited by 42
“Publication bias refers to the increased likelihood of publication of significant effects compared to null results (Field and Gillett 2010).”
ResultHada, A., & Coyer, F. M. (2021) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.12825 · Cited by 45
CBCT in dental age estimation: A systematic review and meta analysis
Boedi, R. M., Shepherd, S. D., Mânica, S., & Franco, A. (2022) · Dentomaxillofacial Radiology · doi:10.1259/dmfr.20210335 · Cited by 42
Yang, M., Duan, Y., Liang, W., Peiris, D. L. I. H. K., & Baker, J. S. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20021560 · Cited by 45
The Association Between Relational Aggression and Internalizing Symptoms: A Review and Meta-Analysis
Marshall, N. A., Arnold, D. H., Rolon‐Arroyo, B., & Griffith, S. F. (2015) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2015.34.2.135 · Cited by 45
Expressed Emotion in relatives of persons with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Safavi, R., Berry, K., & Wearden, A. J. (2015) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2015.1111863 · Cited by 42
Pearcey, S., Gordon, K., Chakrabarti, B., Dodd, H. F., Halldorsson, B., & Creswell, C. (2020) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13310 · Cited by 44
Cole, S. N., Smith, D. M., Ragan, K., Suurmond, R., & Armitage, C. J. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01880-6 · Cited by 52
Wang, F., Ni, X., Zhang, M.-Z., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105003 · Cited by 47
A meta-analysis of the effects of design thinking on student learning
Yu, Q., Yu, K., & Lin, R. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03237-5 · Cited by 41
Kästner, D., Löwe, B., & Gumz, A. (2018) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22975 · Cited by 42
Aljarah, A., & Ibrahim, B. (2020) · Journal of Promotion Management · doi:10.1080/10496491.2020.1746464 · Cited by 49
Infections in Burn Patients: A Retrospective View over Seven Years
Tsolakidis, S., Freytag, D. L., Dovern, E., Alharbi, Z., Kim, B., Houschyar, K. S., Reumuth, G., Schäfer, B., Rennekampff, H., Pallua, N., et al. (2022) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina58081066 · Cited by 40
Xu, J. (2022) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2022.2137750 · Cited by 48
Ketogenic diet and multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of meta-analysis
Chen, S., Su, X., Feng, Y., Li, R., Liao, M., Fan, L., Liu, J., Chen, S., Zhang, S., Cai, J., et al. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15194161 · Cited by 41
Motivating factors of farmers’ adaptation behaviors to climate change in China: A meta-analysis
Huang, Y., Long, H., Jiang, Y., Feng, D., Ma, Z., & Mumtaz, F. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121105 · Cited by 42
Xu, X., Liu, Z., Gong, S., & Wu, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19031391 · Cited by 39
“The weighted mean of reliability of other studies was used as their reliability coefficient [60].”
MethodPredictors of Persistent Participation in Youth Sport: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Zhang, M., Wang, X.-C., & Shao, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871936 · Cited by 49
Thörel, E., Pauls, N., & Göritz, A. S. (2022) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866221116309 · Cited by 53
Schäfer, S. K., Sopp, M. R., Fuchs, A., Kotzur, M., Maahs, L., & Michael, T. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.106 · Cited by 49
The importance of wetland habitat area for waterbird species‐richness
Cerda‐Peña, C., & Rau, J. R. (2023) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/ibi.13205 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Field, A. P., & Gillett, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Field, Andy P.
- Gillett, Raphael
- ORCID
- Field, Andy P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 665-694
- ISSN
- 0007-1102 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8317
- OpenAlex
- W2094667953
- Cited by
- 1,162
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 99 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 18.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- meta-analysis, effect size, publication bias, inclusion criteria, article selection, meta-analysis software
- MeSH terms
- Computer Simulation, Data Collection, Humans, Mathematical Computing, Psychology, Research, Software, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic, Publication Bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review