Cited by 44Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Technology-supported Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic health conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Herbert, Matthew S., Dochat, Cara, Wooldridge, Jennalee S., Materna, Karla, Blanco, Brian H., Tynan, Mara, Lee, Michael W., Gasperi, Marianna +3 more·2022·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Chronic health conditions (CHCs) are common and associated with functional limitations. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) shows promise in improving functioning, quality of life, and distress across several CHCs. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of technology-supported ACT for CHCs and perform a meta-analysis on functioning and ACT process outcomes. Multiple databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials. A total of 20 unique studies with 2,430 randomized participants were included. CHCs addressed in these studies were chronic pain (k = 9), obesity/overweight (k = 4), cancer (k = 3), hearing loss (k = 1), HIV (k = 1), multiple sclerosis (k = 1), and tinnitus (k = 1). Internet and telephone were the most used technology platforms. All studies included therapist contact with considerable heterogeneity between studies. Random effects meta-analyses found medium effect sizes showing technology-supported ACT outperformed comparator groups on measures of function at post-treatment (Hedges' g = -0.49; p = 0.002) and follow-up (Hedges' g = -0.52; p = 0.02), as well as ACT process outcomes at post-treatment (Hedges' g = 0.48; p < 0.001) and follow-up (Hedges' g = 0.44; p < 0.001). Technology-supported ACT shows promise for improving function and ACT process outcomes across a range of CHCs. Recommendations are provided to optimize technology-supported ACT for CHCs. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020200230.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103995

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review by Inês and colleagues, including 5 randomized controlled trials with 746 participants, found that technology-based ACT demonstrated moderate effects in pain intervention and pain acceptance, and smaller effects in depression, mindfulness, and psychological flexibility compared to control groups.

    “Inês and colleagues focused on technology-based ACT interventions for patients with chronic pain, incorporating 5 RCTs with a total of 746 participants [26]. They observed that, compared to control groups, technology-based ACT demonstrated moderate effects in pain intervention and pain acceptance, and smaller effects in depression, mindfulness, and psychological flexibility [26].”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis on psychological outcomes and quality of life (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multiple systematic reviews have confirmed that clinical personnel using ACT can effectively improve certain indicators of patients with chronic pain, such as anxiety, depression, and pain acceptance.

    “Our literature review shows that multiple systematic reviews have confirmed that clinical personnel using ACT can effectively improve certain indicators of patients with chronic pain, such as anxiety, depression, and pain acceptance [23, 25, 26].”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis on psychological outcomes and quality of life (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Discussion reports that technology-supported ACT improved functioning and ACT-process outcomes across chronic health conditions, including chronic pain; the Results list pain acceptance among the processes measured. Nearly all interventions involved a therapist. The review does not establish improvements in anxiety and depression specifically for chronic-pain patients, and its findings concern technology-supported ACT rather than clinician-delivered ACT generally. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Face-to-face psychological treatment has been limited by high costs, long waiting times and therapist availability, and internet-delivered ACT has potential to increase accessibility.

    “face-to-face psychological treatment has been limited by high costs, long-waiting times and therapist availability, and internet-delivered ACT has the potential to increase the accessibility of treatment.23”

    From SoundMind Trial: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial for online acceptance and commitment therapy and sound therapy for tinnitus (2024) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction says that in-person ACT can be difficult for people with chronic health conditions who lack the time, money, or ability to attend weekly appointments, and that technology-supported ACT, including internet delivery, could increase access. It does not identify long waiting times or therapist availability as barriers; its access claim is also specific to people with chronic health conditions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Herbert's study focused solely on technology-supported ACT.

    “Our meta-analysis, incorporating a variety of ACT interventions, stands in contrast to Herbert’s study, which focused solely on technology-supported ACT [26].”
  • ACT interventions have been found to benefit individuals with a range of chronic health conditions.

    “ACT interventions have been found to benefit individuals with a range of chronic health conditions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herbert, M. S., Dochat, C., Wooldridge, J. S., Materna, K., Blanco, B. H., Tynan, M., Lee, M. W., Gasperi, M., Camodeca, A., Harris, D., & Afari, N.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Herbert, Matthew S.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
148
Pages
103995
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3213115339
Cited by
44
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (R01DK106415)
  • Department of Veterans Affairs (1IK2CX002107, 1IK2RX002807)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, chronic disease, online therapy, telephone-delivered therapy, functional outcome, chronic pain, obesity, cancer, hearing loss, HIV, multiple sclerosis, tinnitus, quality of life
MeSH terms
Humans, Quality of Life, Technology, Telephone, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Chronic Pain, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review