Cited by 60Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesBehavioral Health and InterventionsHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The role of clinical and social cognitive variables in parasuicide

Open access
O'Connor, Rory C., Armitage, Christopher J., Gray, Lorna·2006·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objectives The central aim of the present study was to investigate the extent to which social cognitive variables could mediate the effects of past self‐harm behaviour and clinical variables on intentions to engage in deliberate self‐harm (DSH) and suicidality in the next three months. In addition, we aimed to extend the application of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) beyond distal health outcomes to a behaviour that is proximal and extreme. Design and method A prospective study design was employed. Ninety parasuicide patients admitted via accident and emergency to a general hospital completed measures of hopelessness, depression, anxiety, past self‐harm behaviour, standard TPB and group identity measures within days of an overdose. Three months later, participants were asked to complete a measure of suicidal thinking and behaviour. Results There was clear evidence that the social cognitive variables were significant predictors of intention to engage in DSH and suicidality three months later. Depression was the only clinical variable which remained significant when all variables were entered into the final model to predict intentions. Attitudes, self‐efficacy and intention mediated the clinical variables‐suicidality relationship. Conclusions The TPB is a useful framework for understanding suicidal behaviour. The results extend the application of the TPB beyond distal health outcomes to a behaviour that is both proximal and extreme. Future research should explore the implications for screening assessment and suicide prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466505x82315

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with less negative attitudes towards suicide/death are more likely to consider suicide as an option when they are trapped.

    “the IMV model also hypothesizes that individuals with less negative attitudes towards suicide/death are also more likely to consider suicide as an option when they are trapped [16,54]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Connor, R. C., Armitage, C. J., & Gray, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
465-481
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W1998270235
Cited by
60
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
parasuicide, self-harm, theory of planned behavior, social cognitive variables, suicidal ideation, hopelessness, depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, attitudes, group identity, suicide prevention, drug overdose
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Social Perception, Suicide, Attempted, Time Factors, Prevalence, Self Efficacy, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review