CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 87Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesStudent Stress and CopingGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Do procrastination-friendly environments make students delay unnecessarily?

Nordby, Kent, Klingsieck, Katrin B., Svartdal, Frode·2017·Social Psychology of Education
DOI 10.1007/s11218-017-9386-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11218-017-9386-x

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Procrastination-friendly factors may affect students differentially, with those prone to procrastination particularly vulnerable.

    “Often, however, “procrastination-friendly” factors may also affect students differentially, those being prone to procrastination in the first place being particularly vulnerable (e.g., Nordby et al., 2017; Visser et al., 2018).”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Nordby et al., 2017

  • Study topics may vary in how much freedom they offer; some programs are strictly structured, whereas others are less structured and may appear as more procrastination friendly.

    “Of note, study topics may vary in how much freedom they offer to the student. Some study programs are strictly structured and may even involve a common study group from start to finish (e.g., medicine), whereas other study topics are less structured and may also, by the nature of their contents, appear as more “procrastination friendly” (e.g., Nordby et al., 2017).”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Nordby et al., 2017

  • Prior research has indicated complex findings regarding the role of peers in facilitating or inhibiting procrastination.

    “Prior research has indicated quite complex findings regarding the role of peers in facilitating or inhibiting procrastination (e.g., Nordby et al., 2017).”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Nordby et al., 2017

  • Peer behavior is taken into account by procrastinating students.

    “Indirect support for this notion also comes from Klingsieck et al. (2013) and Nordby et al. (2017), who report that peer behavior is taken into account by procrastinating students.”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Nordby et al., 2017

  • Less structured programs may be more 'procrastination friendly'.

    “Other programs are less structured and may also, by the nature of their study contents, be more “procrastination friendly” (e.g., Nordby et al., 2017).”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Nordby et al., 2017

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Nordby, K., Klingsieck, K. B., & Svartdal, F.
Affiliations
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • Paderborn University (DE)
Corresponding author
Svartdal, Frode
ORCID
Venue
Social Psychology of Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-07-14
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
491-512
ISSN
  • 1381-2890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1928
DOI
10.1007/s11218-017-9386-x
OpenAlex
W2735278178
Cited by
87
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
Social Psychology of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
academic procrastination, environmental factors, peer influence, procrastination prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review