Cited by 59Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Cyber aggression among college students: Demographic differences, predictors of distress, and the role of the university

Bauman, Sheri, Baldasare, Angela·2015·Journal of college student development

Abstract

Using the Cyberbullying Experiences Survey, we collected data from 1,114 undergraduate students at a large public Southwestern university. In addition to inquiring about students’ experiences with bullying, we inquired about the level of distress and the digital medium used. Results showed differences in types of experiences and level of distress by demographic groups (members of Greek organizations, LGBT students), and obtained students’ perspectives on the role of the university in curbing this behavior. The strongest predictor of the level of distress was the use of Facebook to perpetrate the bullying. Implications of findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/csd.2015.0039

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauman, S., & Baldasare, A.
Venue
Journal of college student development
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2015-05
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
317-330
ISSN
  • 0897-5264 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-3382
OpenAlex
W2153427221
Cited by
59
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of college student development (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, online aggression, university students, psychological distress, demographic differences, Greek organizations, LGBTQ students, Facebook, online harassment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review