The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender Differences in Mathematical Trajectories
Abstract
In this article we test the hypothesis that male students outperform female students in mathematics. Using large national data sets and curvilinear growth models, we examine gender differences in mathematical trajectories from elementary school through high school. We analyze subsamples of high-scoring students and also different areas of math, such as reasoning and geometry. Despite relatively equal starting points in elementary school, and relatively equal slopes, we find that hoys have a faster rate of acceleration. By the 12th grade, this results in a slight gender difference, which is most pronounced in geometry. Realizing this slight and delayed emergence of gender differences, we qualify the strong conclusions of earlier research, such as Benbow and Stanley's (1980, 1983), which found that large gender differences emerge by junior high school.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new perspective on women's math achievement.
Kimball, M. M. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.198 · Cited by 481
Cited by
The gender similarities hypothesis.
Hyde, J. S. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.6.581 · Cited by 3,084
Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014412 · Cited by 957
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/bf03173468 · Cited by 640
Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap*
Carrell, S. E., Page, M. E., & West, J. E. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1101 · Cited by 584
The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension
Vilenius‐Tuohimaa, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. (2008) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410701708228 · Cited by 320
Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes
Penner, A. M., & Paret, M. (2008) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.012 · Cited by 254
Barres, B. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/442133a · Cited by 241
Garon-Carrier, G., Boivin, M., Guay, F., Kovas, Y., Dionne, G., Lemelin, J.-P., Séguin, J. R., Vitaro, F., & Tremblay, R. E. (2016) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12458 · Cited by 178
Social status as a predictor of race and gender stereotypes in late childhood and early adolescence
Rowley, S. J., Kurtz‐Costes, B., Mistry, R., & Feagans, L. (2007) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00376.x · Cited by 149
Arens, A. K., Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Murayama, K., & vom Hofe, R. (2017) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000163 · Cited by 140
Feingold, A. (2019) · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.15.2.p096 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Leahey, E., & Guo, G.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 713-732
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W2114069646
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
