Cited by 149Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsNetwork Time Synchronization TechnologiesScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet.

Realization of a timescale with an accurate optical lattice clock

Open access
Grebing, Christian, Al-Masoudi, Ali, Dörscher, Sören, Häfner, Sebastian, Gerginov, Vladislav, Weyers, Stefan, Lipphardt, Burghard, Riehle, Fritz, Sterr, Uwe, Lisdat, Christian·2016·Optica

Abstract

Optical clocks are not only powerful tools for prime fundamental research, but are also deemed for the re-definition of the SI base unit second as they now surpass the performance of caesium atomic clocks in both accuracy and stability by more than an order of magnitude. However, an important obstacle in this transition has so far been the limited reliability of the optical clocks that made a continuous realization of a timescale impractical. In this paper, we demonstrate how this situation can be resolved and that a timescale based on an optical clock can be established that is superior to one based on even the best caesium fountain clocks. The paper also gives further proof of the international consistency of strontium lattice clocks on the $10^{-16}$ accuracy level, which is another prerequisite for a change in the definition of the second.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/optica.3.000563

Cites

47 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–147 of 147

Metadata

Authors
Grebing, C., Al-Masoudi, A., Dörscher, S., Häfner, S., Gerginov, V., Weyers, S., Lipphardt, B., Riehle, F., Sterr, U., & Lisdat, C.
Venue
Optica
Published
2016-05-25
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
563
ISSN
2334-2536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2295004978
Cited by
149
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optica (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Centre of Quantum Engineering and Space-Time Research (QUEST)
  • German Research Foundation (DFG) (RTG 1729, CRC 1128)
  • International Timescales with Optical Clocks (ITOC)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Time Synchronization Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Keywords
optical lattice clock, redefinition of the second, clock frequency stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review