CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring the complex orbital angular momentum spectrum and spatial mode decomposition of structured light beams

D’Errico, Alessio, D’Amelio, Raffaele, Piccirillo, Bruno, Cardano, Filippo, Marrucci, Lorenzo·2017·Optica
DOI 10.1364/optica.4.001350
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/optica.4.001350

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A spectrum analyzer is capable of measuring the instantaneous power and phase distributions of OAM components.

    “In this direction, a spectrum analyzer is a device capable to measure the instantaneous power and phase distributions of OAM components [48,52,[69][70][71][72][73][74].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Results and Discussion section (page unavailable) explains how interference images yield the complex coefficients of OAM components, supporting measurement of their power and phase. It says full decomposition requires four images and interferometric stability; it does not establish that the distributions are measured instantaneously. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes

    Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M. W., Spreeuw, R. J. C., & Woerdman, J. P. (1992) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.45.8185 · Cited by 10,455

  • Spin–orbit interactions of light

    Bliokh, K. Y., Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Nori, F., & Zayats, A. V. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.201 · Cited by 2,276 · cited 1×

    “Controlled superpositions of helical modes, possibly combined with orthogonal polarization states via spin-orbit interaction [4, 5], result in spatially structured beams that are proving useful for a broad set of photonic applications [6], such as for instance classical and quantum optical communication [7–10], quantu…”
    Background

  • Detection of Zak phases and topological invariants in a chiral quantum walk of twisted photons

    Cardano, F., D’Errico, A., Dauphin, A., Maffei, M., Piccirillo, B., de Lisio, C., De Filippis, G., Cataudella, V., Santamato, E., Marrucci, L., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15516 · Cited by 351

    Self-citation

  • Spin-orbit interactions of light

    Bliokh, K. Y., Rodriguez-Fortuno, F. J., Nori, F., & Zayats, A. V. (2015) · arXiv · cited 1×

    “Controlled superpositions of helical modes, possibly combined with orthogonal polarization states via spin-orbit interaction [4, 5], result in spatially structured beams that are proving useful for a broad set of photonic applications [6], such as for instance classical and quantum optical communication [7–10], quantu…”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Yao, 2011, Adv. Opt. Photon., 3, 161, 10.1364/AOP.3.000161 · DOI
  2. Karimi, 2007, Opt. Lett., 32, 3053, 10.1364/OL.32.003053 · DOI
  3. Cardano, 2015, Nat. Photonics, 9, 776, 10.1038/nphoton.2015.232 · DOI
  4. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, 2017, J. Opt., 19, 013001, 10.1088/2040-8978/19/1/013001 · DOI
  5. Vallone, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 060503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.060503 · DOI
  6. Willner, 2015, Adv. Opt. Photon., 7, 66, 10.1364/AOP.7.000066 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Mirhosseini, 2015, New J. Phys., 17, 033033, 10.1088/1367-2630/17/3/033033 · DOI
  8. Bouchard, 2017, Sci. Adv., 3, e1601915, 10.1126/sciadv.1601915 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Wang, 2015, Nature, 518, 516, 10.1038/nature14246 · DOI
  10. Malik, 2016, Nat. Photonics, 10, 248, 10.1038/nphoton.2016.12 · DOI
  11. Hiesmayr, 2016, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 073601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.073601 · DOI
  12. Cardano, 2016, Nat. Commun., 7, 11439, 10.1038/ncomms11439 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Sztul, 2006, Opt. Lett., 31, 999, 10.1364/OL.31.000999 · DOI
  14. Hickmann, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 053904, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.053904 · DOI
  15. Ferreira, 2011, Opt. Lett., 36, 3106, 10.1364/OL.36.003106 · DOI
  16. Mourka, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 5760, 10.1364/OE.19.005760 · DOI
  17. Mazilu, 2012, Appl. Phys. Lett., 100, 231115, 10.1063/1.4728111 · DOI
  18. Berkhout, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 100801, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.100801 · DOI
  19. Harris, 1994, Phys. Rev. A, 49, 3119, 10.1103/PhysRevA.49.3119 · DOI
  20. Padgett, 1996, Am. J. Phys., 64, 77, 10.1119/1.18283 · DOI
  21. Leach, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 257901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257901 · DOI
  22. Slussarenko, 2010, Opt. Express, 18, 27205, 10.1364/OE.18.027205 · DOI
  23. Lavery, 2011, New J. Phys., 13, 093014, 10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/093014 · DOI
  24. Courtial, 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 4828, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4828 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Vasnetsov, 2003, Opt. Lett., 28, 2285, 10.1364/OL.28.002285 · DOI
  26. Zhou, 2016, Light Sci. Appl., 6, e16251, 10.1038/lsa.2016.251 · DOI
  27. Mair, 2001, Nature, 412, 313, 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kaiser, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 9347, 10.1364/OE.17.009347 · DOI
  29. Schulze, 2013, New J. Phys., 15, 073025, 10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073025 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Karimi, 2009, Appl. Phys. Lett., 94, 231124, 10.1063/1.3154549 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Karimi, 2012, Opt. Lett., 37, 127, 10.1364/OL.37.000127 · DOI
  32. Bierdz, 2013, New J. Phys., 15, 113062, 10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/113062 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Gruneisen, 2011, New J. Phys., 13, 083030, 10.1088/1367-2630/13/8/083030 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Berkhout, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 153601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.153601 · DOI
  35. Mirhosseini, 2013, Nat. Commun., 4, 1, 10.1038/ncomms3781 · DOI
  36. Malik, 2014, Nat. Commun., 5, 3115, 10.1038/ncomms4115 · DOI
  37. Forbes, 2016, Adv. Opt. Photon., 8, 200, 10.1364/AOP.8.000200 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Zhao, 2017, Opt. Lett., 42, 1080, 10.1364/OL.42.001080 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Berkhout, 2011, Opt. Lett., 36, 1863, 10.1364/OL.36.001863 · DOI
  40. Mirhosseini, 2016, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 1, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.130402 · DOI
  41. Fickler, 2017, Phys. Rev. B, 95, 161108, 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.161108 · DOI
  42. Schulze, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 27866, 10.1364/OE.20.027866 · DOI
  43. Abouraddy, 2011, Opt. Lett., 36, 4683, 10.1364/OL.36.004683 · DOI
  44. Grillo, 2015, Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 034801, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.034801 · DOI
  45. Marrucci, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 163905, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Marrucci, 2011, J. Opt., 13, 064001, 10.1088/2040-8978/13/6/064001 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Karimi, 2009, Opt. Lett., 34, 1225, 10.1364/OL.34.001225 · DOI
  48. Vallone, 2017, Opt. Lett., 42, 1097, 10.1364/OL.42.001097 · DOI
  49. Piccirillo, 2015, Nat. Commun., 6, 8606, 10.1038/ncomms9606 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Takeda, 1982, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 72, 156, 10.1364/JOSA.72.000156 · DOI
  51. Yamaguchi, 1997, Opt. Lett., 22, 1268, 10.1364/OL.22.001268 · DOI
  52. Piccirillo, 2010, Appl. Phys. Lett., 97, 241104, 10.1063/1.3527083 · DOI
  53. Ismail, 1992, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 115, 131, 10.1090/S0002-9939-1992-1079891-5 · DOI
  54. Gatteschi, 2002, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 144, 7, 10.1016/S0377-0427(01)00549-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
D’Errico, A., D’Amelio, R., Piccirillo, B., Cardano, F., & Marrucci, L.
Venue
Optica
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2017-10-27
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
1350
ISSN
2334-2536
DOI
10.1364/optica.4.001350
Cited by
162
References
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (ERC) (694683 (PHOSPhOR))

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review