The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic redundancy fuels polygenic adaptation in Drosophila
Open accessAbstract
The genetic architecture of adaptive traits is of key importance to predict evolutionary responses. Most adaptive traits are polygenic-i.e., result from selection on a large number of genetic loci-but most molecularly characterized traits have a simple genetic basis. This discrepancy is best explained by the difficulty in detecting small allele frequency changes (AFCs) across many contributing loci. To resolve this, we use laboratory natural selection to detect signatures for selective sweeps and polygenic adaptation. We exposed 10 replicates of a Drosophila simulans population to a new temperature regime and uncovered a polygenic architecture of an adaptive trait with high genetic redundancy among beneficial alleles. We observed convergent responses for several phenotypes-e.g., fitness, metabolic rate, and fat content-and a strong polygenic response (99 selected alleles; mean s = 0.059). However, each of these selected alleles increased in frequency only in a subset of the evolving replicates. We discerned different evolutionary paradigms based on the heterogeneous genomic patterns among replicates. Redundancy and quantitative trait (QT) paradigms fitted the experimental data better than simulations assuming independent selective sweeps. Our results show that natural D. simulans populations harbor a vast reservoir of adaptive variation facilitating rapid evolutionary responses using multiple alternative genetic pathways converging at a new phenotypic optimum. This key property of beneficial alleles requires the modification of testing strategies in natural populations beyond the search for convergence on the molecular level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene
Smith, J. M., & Haigh, J. (1974) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300014634 · Cited by 3,415
Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe
Tishkoff, S. A., Reed, F. A., Ranciaro, A., Voight, B. F., Babbitt, C. C., Silverman, J. S., Powell, K., Mortensen, H. M., Hirbo, J. B., Osman, M., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1946 · Cited by 1,615
Genome-wide patterns of selection in 230 ancient Eurasians
Mathieson, I., Lazaridis, I., Rohland, N., Mallick, S., Patterson, N., Roodenberg, S. A., Harney, E., Stewardson, K., Fernandes, D., Novak, M., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16152 · Cited by 1,515
The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation
Pritchard, J. K., Pickrell, J. K., & Coop, G. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.055 · Cited by 932 · cited 1×
“However, such simple traits are the exception rather than the rule, and most traits are polygenic, with many contributing loci [10,11].”
Kofler, R., Pandey, R. V., & Schlötterer, C. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr589 · Cited by 815
Self-citationThe Molecular Diversity of Adaptive Convergence
Tenaillon, O., Rodríguez-Verdugo, A., Gaut, R. L., McDonald, P., Bennett, A. F., Long, A. D., & Gaut, B. S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1212986 · Cited by 815
Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila
Burke, M. K., Dunham, J. P., Shahrestani, P., Thornton, K. R., Rose, M. R., & Long, A. D. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09352 · Cited by 448
Adaptation–not by sweeps alone
Pritchard, J. K., & Di Rienzo, A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2880 · Cited by 445
Cited by
Polygenic adaptation: a unifying framework to understand positive selection
Barghi, N., Hermisson, J., & Schlötterer, C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0250-z · Cited by 425
Self-citationEvolutionary genomics can improve prediction of species’ responses to climate change
Waldvogel, A.-M., Feldmeyer, B., Rolshausen, G., Exposito-Alonso, M., Rellstab, C., Kofler, R., Mock, T., Schmid, K., Schmitt, I., Bataillon, T., et al. (2020) · Evolution Letters · doi:10.1002/evl3.154 · Cited by 348
Self-citationThe importance of genetic redundancy in evolution
Láruson, Á. J., Yeaman, S., & Lotterhos, K. E. (2020) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2020.04.009 · Cited by 201
Estimating the genome-wide contribution of selection to temporal allele frequency change
Buffalo, V., & Coop, G. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1919039117 · Cited by 116
Parallel genetic evolution and speciation from standing variation
Thompson, K. A., Osmond, M. M., & Schluter, D. (2019) · Evolution Letters · doi:10.1002/evl3.106 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Barghi, N., Tobler, R., Nolte, V., Jakšić, A. M., Mallard, F., Otte, K. A., Dolezal, M., Taus, T., Kofler, R., & Schlötterer, C.
- Venue
- PLOS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2019-02-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e3000128
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2913676002
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 20.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic redundancy fuels polygenic adaptation in Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000128
- The paper
- Barghi, N., Tobler, R., Nolte, V., Jakšić, A. M., Mallard, F., Otte, K. A., Dolezal, M., Taus, T., Kofler, R., & Schlötterer, C. (2019). Genetic redundancy fuels polygenic adaptation in Drosophila. PLOS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.