Cited by 156

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MicroRNA 128a Increases Intracellular ROS Level by Targeting Bmi-1 and Inhibits Medulloblastoma Cancer Cell Growth by Promoting Senescence

Venkataraman, Sujatha, Alimova, Irina, Fan, Rong, Harris, Peter, Foreman, Nicholas, Vibhakar, Rajeev·2010·PLoS ONE

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0010748

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Down regulation of microRNAs in medulloblastoma. A) MicroRNA heat map profiling of medulloblastoma patient samples and comparison to normal cerebellum. B) Repression of miR-125, miR-128, miR-139, let-7g and increased expression of miR17-5p in medulloblastoma cell lines. C) Relative expression of microRNAs in medulloblastoma patient samples.
Figure 1 Down regulation of microRNAs in medulloblastoma. A) MicroRNA heat map profiling of medulloblastoma patient samples and comparison to normal cerebellum. B) Repression of miR-125, miR-128, miR-139, let-7g and increased expression of miR17-5p in medulloblastoma cell lines. C) Relative expression of microRNAs in medulloblastoma patient samples.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Inhibition of medulloblastoma cell growth by microRNA-128a. A) MiR-128a inhibits medulloblastoma cell proliferation as measured by MTT assay. (p<01) B) Number of Daoy cells as measured by trypan blue dye exclusion assay. C) Decreased colony formation in miR-128a transfected cells (top row is miR-128a vector, bottom row is control vector). D) Colony counts in triplicate of 2 independent experiments. (p<0.001)
Figure 2 Inhibition of medulloblastoma cell growth by microRNA-128a. A) MiR-128a inhibits medulloblastoma cell proliferation as measured by MTT assay. (p<01) B) Number of Daoy cells as measured by trypan blue dye exclusion assay. C) Decreased colony formation in miR-128a transfected cells (top row is miR-128a vector, bottom row is control vector). D) Colony counts in triplicate of 2 independent experiments. (p<0.001)CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Transfection of Daoy cells with miR-128a decreases Bmi-1 expression. A) MiR-128a target site in the Bmi-1 3′UTR. B) Luciferase reporter assays indicate that miR-128a functionally targets the wt Bmi-1 3′UTR, *p<0.01 C) Western blot analysis confirms that miR-128a, but not the control miR (CM), inhibits protein expression of Bmi-1 in medulloblastoma cells. D) Quantitation of Western blot bands. (p<0.01)
Figure 3 Transfection of Daoy cells with miR-128a decreases Bmi-1 expression. A) MiR-128a target site in the Bmi-1 3′UTR. B) Luciferase reporter assays indicate that miR-128a functionally targets the wt Bmi-1 3′UTR, *p<0.01 C) Western blot analysis confirms that miR-128a, but not the control miR (CM), inhibits protein expression of Bmi-1 in medulloblastoma cells. D) Quantitation of Western blot bands. (p<0.01)CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Growth inhibition signaling pathways modulated by miR-128a. A) Western blot analysis showed increased p16 expression in Daoy cells transfected with miR-128a compared to that of the control vector, pVETL. The level of p16 expression was completely inhibited in Daoy cells that were transfected with the Bmi-1 vector alone while modest inhibition was observed in cells co-transfected with miR-128a. B) Decreased E2F1 activity in Daoy cells transfected with miR-128a as measured by luciferase reporter assays. (p<0.01)
Figure 4 Growth inhibition signaling pathways modulated by miR-128a. A) Western blot analysis showed increased p16 expression in Daoy cells transfected with miR-128a compared to that of the control vector, pVETL. The level of p16 expression was completely inhibited in Daoy cells that were transfected with the Bmi-1 vector alone while modest inhibition was observed in cells co-transfected with miR-128a. B) Decreased E2F1 activity in Daoy cells transfected with miR-128a as measured by luciferase reporter assays. (p<0.01)CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Bmi-1 rescues miR-128a mediated growth arrest of medulloblastoma cells. A) Co-transfection of Daoy cells with miR-128a and Bmi-1 increased the number of colonies formed compared to that of miR-128a alone. B) Quantitative analysis of the number of colonies formed by Daoy cells after different transfections, including Bmi-1 that lacks its 3′UTR. pBABE-puro is a control vector for the full length Bmi-1. *p<0.05 for miR-128a vs. pVETL and **p<0.001 for miR-128a vs. miR-128a + Bmi-1.
Figure 5 Bmi-1 rescues miR-128a mediated growth arrest of medulloblastoma cells. A) Co-transfection of Daoy cells with miR-128a and Bmi-1 increased the number of colonies formed compared to that of miR-128a alone. B) Quantitative analysis of the number of colonies formed by Daoy cells after different transfections, including Bmi-1 that lacks its 3′UTR. pBABE-puro is a control vector for the full length Bmi-1. *p<0.05 for miR-128a vs. pVETL and **p<0.001 for miR-128a vs. miR-128a + Bmi-1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 MiR-128a increases intracellular ROS by targeting Bmi-1. A) Increased superoxide radical formation in Daoy cells that were transfected with miR-128a as detected using EPR spectra of the DMPO-OH spin adduct (closed circles in (ii)). The spectra collected are a signal average of 15 scans. The 1∶2∶2∶1(closed circles) quartet signal seen is due to the formation of DMPO-OH. The cells treated with miR-128a have ∼3 fold increase in ROS signal intensity (ii) as compared to the empty vector (i). Co-transfection of cells with miR-128a and Bmi-1 resulted in a decreased ROS level compared to that of miR-128a alone (iii). The treatment of SOD in miR-128a-transfected cells abolished the signals showing that the radical formed is mainly superoxide (iv). B) The quantitative analysis of EPR peak height normalized to cell number. *p<0.05 miR128a vs. pVETL and miR-128a + SOD.
Figure 6 MiR-128a increases intracellular ROS by targeting Bmi-1. A) Increased superoxide radical formation in Daoy cells that were transfected with miR-128a as detected using EPR spectra of the DMPO-OH spin adduct (closed circles in (ii)). The spectra collected are a signal average of 15 scans. The 1∶2∶2∶1(closed circles) quartet signal seen is due to the formation of DMPO-OH. The cells treated with miR-128a have ∼3 fold increase in ROS signal intensity (ii) as compared to the empty vector (i). Co-transfection of cells with miR-128a and Bmi-1 resulted in a decreased ROS level compared to that of miR-128a alone (iii). The treatment of SOD in miR-128a-transfected cells abolished the signals showing that the radical formed is mainly superoxide (iv). B) The quantitative analysis of EPR peak height normalized to cell number. *p<0.05 miR128a vs. pVETL and miR-128a + SOD.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 MiR-128a promotes senescence in medulloblastoma cells. A) MiR-128a induces senescence in medulloblastoma cells as detected by SA-beta galactosidase staining (dark blue cells; examples indicated by red arrows). B) Cell counts per High Powered Field of β-gal positive cells in control vector (pVETL) or miR-128a transfected cells, *p = 0.003. C) Western blot analysis showing increased level of H3K9me2 protein in Daoy cells transfected with miR-128a when compared to the empty vector. Actin is used as an internal control.
Figure 7 MiR-128a promotes senescence in medulloblastoma cells. A) MiR-128a induces senescence in medulloblastoma cells as detected by SA-beta galactosidase staining (dark blue cells; examples indicated by red arrows). B) Cell counts per High Powered Field of β-gal positive cells in control vector (pVETL) or miR-128a transfected cells, *p = 0.003. C) Western blot analysis showing increased level of H3K9me2 protein in Daoy cells transfected with miR-128a when compared to the empty vector. Actin is used as an internal control.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. JT Rutka, 2004, Advances in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors., Expert Rev Neurother, 4, 879, 10.1586/14737175.4.5.879 · DOI
  2. RK Mulhern, 2005, Neurocognitive consequences of risk-adapted therapy for childhood medulloblastoma., J Clin Oncol, 23, 5511, 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.703 · DOI
  3. SK Singh, 2004, Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells., Nature, 432, 396, 10.1038/nature03128 · DOI
  4. R Wechsler-Reya, 2001, The developmental biology of brain tumors., Annu Rev Neurosci, 24, 385, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.385 · DOI
  5. JB Rubin, 2002, Medulloblastoma: a problem of developmental biology., Cancer Cell, 2, 7, 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00090-9 · DOI
  6. A Lee, 2005, Isolation of neural stem cells from the postnatal cerebellum., Nat Neurosci, 8, 723, 10.1038/nn1473 · DOI
  7. S Marino, 2005, Medulloblastoma: developmental mechanisms out of control., Trends Mol Med, 11, 17, 10.1016/j.molmed.2004.11.008 · DOI
  8. E Ferretti, 2009, MicroRNA profiling in human medulloblastoma., Int J Cancer, 124, 568, 10.1002/ijc.23948 · DOI
  9. PA Northcott, 2009, The miR-17/92 polycistron is up-regulated in sonic hedgehog-driven medulloblastomas and induced by N-myc in sonic hedgehog-treated cerebellar neural precursors., Cancer Res, 69, 3249, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4710 · DOI
  10. J Pierson, 2008, Regulation of cyclin dependent kinase 6 by microRNA 124 in medulloblastoma., J Neurooncol, 90, 1, 10.1007/s11060-008-9624-3 · DOI · Paper page
  11. T Du, 2005, microPrimer: the biogenesis and function of microRNA., Development, 132, 4645, 10.1242/dev.02070 · DOI
  12. AJ Giraldez, 2005, MicroRNAs regulate brain morphogenesis in zebrafish., Science, 308, 833, 10.1126/science.1109020 · DOI · Paper page
  13. L He, 2005, A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene., Nature, 435, 828, 10.1038/nature03552 · DOI
  14. S Costinean, 2006, Pre-B cell proliferation and lymphoblastic leukemia/high-grade lymphoma in E(mu)-miR155 transgenic mice., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103, 7024, 10.1073/pnas.0602266103 · DOI
  15. J Lu, 2005, MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers., Nature, 435, 834, 10.1038/nature03702 · DOI
  16. MS Kumar, 2007, Impaired microRNA processing enhances cellular transformation and tumorigenesis., Nat Genet, 39, 673, 10.1038/ng2003 · DOI
  17. MF Corsten, 2007, MicroRNA-21 knockdown disrupts glioma growth in vivo and displays synergistic cytotoxicity with neural precursor cell delivered S-TRAIL in human gliomas., Cancer Res, 67, 8994, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1045 · DOI · Paper page
  18. J Silber, 2008, miR-124 and miR-137 inhibit proliferation of glioblastoma multiforme cells and induce differentiation of brain tumor stem cells., BMC Med, 6, 14, 10.1186/1741-7015-6-14 · DOI · Paper page
  19. T Uziel, 2009, The miR-17∼92 cluster collaborates with the Sonic Hedgehog pathway in medulloblastoma., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 2812, 10.1073/pnas.0809579106 · DOI
  20. MC Thompson, 2006, Genomics identifies medulloblastoma subgroups that are enriched for specific genetic alterations., J Clin Oncol, 24, 1924, 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.4974 · DOI
  21. A Grimson, 2007, MicroRNA Targeting Specificity in Mammals: Determinants beyond Seed Pairing., Mol Cell, 27, 91, 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.017 · DOI · Paper page
  22. J Godlewski, 2008, Targeting of the Bmi-1 oncogene/stem cell renewal factor by microRNA-128 inhibits glioma proliferation and self-renewal., Cancer Res, 68, 9125, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2629 · DOI · Paper page
  23. AV Molofsky, 2003, Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation., Nature, 425, 962, 10.1038/nature02060 · DOI
  24. C Leung, 2004, Bmi1 is essential for cerebellar development and is overexpressed in human medulloblastomas., Nature, 428, 337, 10.1038/nature02385 · DOI
  25. D Mihic-Probst, 2007, Consistent expression of the stem cell renewal factor BMI-1 in primary and metastatic melanoma., Int J Cancer, 121, 1764, 10.1002/ijc.22891 · DOI
  26. AV Molofsky, 2005, Bmi-1 promotes neural stem cell self-renewal and neural development but not mouse growth and survival by repressing the p16Ink4a and p19Arf senescence pathways., Genes Dev, 19, 1432, 10.1101/gad.1299505 · DOI
  27. T Finkel, 1999, Signal transduction by reactive oxygen species in non-phagocytic cells., J Leukoc Biol, 65, 337, 10.1002/jlb.65.3.337 · DOI
  28. GM Rosen, 1984, Detection of superoxide generated by endothelial cells., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 81, 7269, 10.1073/pnas.81.23.7269 · DOI
  29. T Lu, 2008, Free radicals and senescence., Exp Cell Res, 314, 1918, 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.01.011 · DOI · Paper page
  30. YS Song, 2005, Dinstinct ROS and biochemical profiles in cells undergoing DNA damage-induced senescence and apoptosis., Mech Ageing Dev, 126, 580, 10.1016/j.mad.2004.11.008 · DOI
  31. E Hara, 1996, Regulation of p16CDKN2 expression and its implications for cell immortalization and senescence., Mol Cell Biol, 16, 859, 10.1128/MCB.16.3.859 · DOI · Paper page
  32. R Vibhakar, 2007, Dickkopf-1 is an epigenetically silenced candidate tumor suppressor gene in medulloblastoma., Neuro-oncol, 9, 135, 10.1215/15228517-2006-038 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Venkataraman, S., Alimova, I., Fan, R., Harris, P., Foreman, N., & Vibhakar, R.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2010-06-21
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
e10748
ISSN
1932-6203
Cited by
156
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review