Cited by 25Aesthetic Perception and AnalysisMemory Processes and InfluencesVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect

Open access
de Zilva, Daniel, Vu, Luke, Newell, Ben R., Pearson, Joel·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Passive exposure to neutral stimuli increases subsequent liking of those stimuli--the mere exposure effect. Because of the broad implications for understanding and controlling human preferences, the role of conscious awareness in mere exposure has received much attention. Previous studies have claimed that the mere exposure effect can occur without conscious awareness of the stimuli. In two experiments, we applied a technique new to the mere exposure literature, called continuous flash suppression, to expose stimuli for a controlled duration with and without awareness. To ensure the reliability of the awareness manipulation, awareness was monitored on a trial-by-trial basis. Our results show that under these conditions the mere exposure effect does not occur without conscious awareness. In contrast, only when participants were aware of the stimuli did exposure increase liking and recognition. Together these data are consistent with the idea that the mere exposure effect requires conscious awareness and has important implications for theories of memory and affect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0077726

Cites

43 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In de Zilva et al. (2013), a significant ME effect emerged only for unsuppressed stimuli and for suppressed stimuli that had entered awareness.

    “Moreover, a significant ME effect emerged only for unsuppressed stimuli and for suppressed stimuli that had entered awareness.”

    From Unawareness of Attitudes, Their Environmental Causes, and Their Behavioral Effects (2025) · cites this paper as de Zilva et al. 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Berlyne DE (1974) The new experimental aesthetics. In DE Berlyne (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics (pp. 1–25). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Zilva, D., Vu, L., Newell, B. R., & Pearson, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Pearson, Joel
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-10-17
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
e77726
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129631281
Cited by
25
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (1049596, 1046198, 1024800)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
mere exposure effect, conscious awareness, continuous flash suppression, liking, recognition memory, preference formation, visual awareness
MeSH terms
Awareness, Female, Humans, Male, Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review